Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
Mon Aug 3, 2015, 09:07 AM Aug 2015

No way to defeat Jewish terrorism without ending the occupation

http://972mag.com/no-way-to-defeat-jewish-terrorism-without-ending-the-occupation/109613/


The defining characteristic of the occupation is that it includes two civilian populations living alongside one another, which are subject to two different legal systems. The Palestinians live under a military regime, while every Israeli who lives or even visits the settlements “brings” the Israeli law with them, including all the legal protections she or he is granted.

The second defining characteristic of the occupation is the Israeli desire to slowly expand the territory and resources for the Jewish public, while slowly lessening Palestinians’ territory. This combination — a military regime with civilian settlement — is what causes the Israeli occupation to look and feel a lot like colonialism or apartheid, even if there is not an exact overlap. This is the essence of the regime, regardless of the question of whether or not this is our forefathers’ land, or who was here first.

Colonialism always goes hand-in-hand with racism, and extreme racism is always accompanied by violence. Even if the original motivation that brings about a colonial situation is not racist, at a certain point the ruling group must somehow justify its own privileges, which inevitably leads to racist worldviews. For example, that the occupied population is not “ready” to have all their rights, or that it is inherently weak and violent; that it doesn’t appreciate life as we do; that it prefers to live in close, dirty quarters, etc. The struggle against racism in Israel — to the degree that it even exists — will fail as long as the occupation exists, since we will always need racism in order to justify the occupation.
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
3. Israel has borders that it should live within, but
Mon Aug 3, 2015, 10:05 AM
Aug 2015

there will always be dimestore hasbarists that will poorly attempt to tapdance around that topic.

6chars

(3,967 posts)
7. that isn't what i said
Mon Aug 3, 2015, 04:34 PM
Aug 2015

i just said people are entitled to their opinions, and i stand by that statement.

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
8. So you really have nothing to say?
Wed Aug 5, 2015, 11:51 PM
Aug 2015

You could have as easily stated that water is wet and achieved the same effect.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
9. So you posted to say you're ok with people having views?
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 01:59 AM
Aug 2015

And you thought we needed to read that BECAUSE...?

Response to Ken Burch (Reply #9)

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
4. So there is a relationship between Judaism and Israeli government policies?
Mon Aug 3, 2015, 10:34 AM
Aug 2015

You seem to go back and forth on this.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
5. Always trying to deflect the conversation! You never go back and forth on that.
Mon Aug 3, 2015, 11:05 AM
Aug 2015

Stick to defending lion murderers.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
10. That wasn't what the OP said and you know it.
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:04 AM
Aug 2015

"Jewish terrorism" is not synonymous with "Judaism". For that matter, Zionism is not synonymous with Judaism. One isa manifestation of extremism in a community, one is a set of related but not identical ethnic, cultural, and religious values that are often in deep tension and conflict with each other, and one is nothing more than an already-triumphant nationalist movement.

You're a better person than to be making insinuations like you just did.

Little Tich

(6,171 posts)
11. If there was a one-state solution, then the occupation could be ended but the settlements could
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:22 AM
Aug 2015

still remain where they are.

I personally think that the two-state solution is less likely, as it would entail not only an end to the occupation, but the removal of more than 500 k settlers. The current status quo only serves to make the one-state solution more inevitable.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»No way to defeat Jewish t...