Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 12:27 PM Jan 2016

Why Human Rights Watch Is Urging Companies to Pull Out of Israeli Settlements

New report stops short of calling for boycott of firms but lays legal foundation for pressuring them over Israel's settlement policy

Firms doing business in Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem are violating international law by harming the rights of the Palestinians who live in the area and should pull out, Human Rights Watch (HRW) says in a report released today. The New York-based advocacy group stops short of calling for a boycott of such businesses in the 162-page report, titled “Occupation, Inc: How Settlement Businesses Contribute to Israel’s Violations of Palestinian Rights.” HRW urges companies to fulfill their obligations to respect the human rights of populations living where they operate—and for companies, rather than consumers that buy their products, to confirm their goods have not come from the 1,000 companies doing business in Israeli-owned industrial zones, on plantation-style farms and quarries on Palestinian land.

The report is still sure to enrage officials in Israel, which has been slowly taking over the West Bank since the territory fell under Israeli military occupation with the lightning defeat of an array of Arab armies in the 1967 Six-Day War. In the 49 years since, a half million Jewish Israelis have taken up residence in the hills and desert valley above the west bank of the Jordan River, as well in East Jerusalem (which Israel said it annexed, rather than military occupied, after the Six-Day War). Along with the Gaza Strip, the crowded coastal enclave from which Israel pulled settlers and troops in 2005, the West Bank was to form a nation-state for millions of Palestinians, in the “two-states for two-peoples” formulation that has been the ostensible diplomatic solution to a conflict that dates back a century, when Jews began arriving in the region to build a homeland for themselves.

But as diplomacy has faltered—the 1994 Oslo Accords produced high hopes followed by nearly a decade of terror and fighting — activists both in Palestine and the West have turned to economic pressure, hoping that boycotts and international opprobrium would force concessions from Israel. But the effort itself is splintered. The umbrella term for the movement—BDS, for Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions—in fact is a specific organization based in Ramallah that aims to do much more than pressure Israel out of the West Bank. BDS would turn the clock back to 1948, by requiring Israel to surrender the very land on which it was founded. The approach supports Israeli allegations that the larger boycott movement amounts to a “strategic threat” to Israel’s existence as a Jewish homeland; Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has likened boycotts to the actions of Nazi Germany.

http://time.com/4183059/why-human-rights-watch-is-urging-companies-to-pull-out-of-israeli-settlements/

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
1. Oh the enraged will come along..the songs that have been sung for many years.
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 12:52 PM
Jan 2016

Look Over There, Now>>>>>>>>>>>

The Only Democracy in the Middle East ( just ignore 50 years of being the occupying power )

I Left My Heart in the West Bank Settlements

It's Mine and You Can't Take It

Add any other songs I may have missed.

Mosby

(16,319 posts)
4. you know you don't have to hyphenate God.
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 05:48 PM
Jan 2016

If you want to fine, but the only Jews who care are the orthodox and I don't think you will find many here.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
5. Thanks for yr concern
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 05:50 PM
Jan 2016

been doing it that way since I was 8 and an orthodox friend admonished me about it, just habit now

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
11. Reviewing the thread now, I can see what you mean.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 10:33 AM
Jan 2016

Personally, I have had issues with HRW for some time now, but I do get amused with people who think it's biased against THEM, and who use it when convenient and dismiss when it's not.

Time has been in the "anti-Israel" camp all along, but HRW has generally treated Israel with kid gloves and frequent inquiries if anything was making it too uncomfortable.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
12. Exactly, they do good work but are not always willing to scrutinize as they should.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 10:45 AM
Jan 2016

B'tselem I have found to be the most thorough and consistent and essentially made it ok
for HRW and AI to go after Israeli policy.

I was having a bit of fun with my song fest titles..at Bibi's and his
supporters expense...that was my aim anyway.

Mosby

(16,319 posts)
3. at this rate Israel will take over the WB by 3035 or so
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 05:42 PM
Jan 2016

But carry on with the hyperbole I guess.

At least it's honest about BDS.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
8. gee weren't you just extolling David Keyes Bibi's new 'human rights' guy because he works under HRW'
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 07:35 PM
Jan 2016

Keyes works under Robert Bernstein, original founder of Human Rights Watch.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1134123593#post3

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
10. Nothing in 162 pages about Crimea, Cyprus, or W. Sahara.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 07:27 AM
Jan 2016

Apparently HRW is totally cool with selling properties in those areas.

This is not a serious report referring to International Law.

It's what one would expect to see from Hamas advocates.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Why Human Rights Watch Is...