Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 11:58 AM Jan 2016

Herzog: For now, two-state solution unrealistic

http://www.timesofisrael.com/herzog-for-now-two-state-solution-unrealistic/



The opposition leader blamed the current Israeli and Palestinian leadership for the impasse — “[Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu and [PA President Mahmoud Abbas] are incapable of moving forward,” he alleged — but said that should he be elected prime minister, his coalition would focus on implementing security measures rather than a bilateral agreement.

“There is a need to initiate security measures that match the reality on the ground and that means separation from the Palestinians,” he told Army Radio, espousing a plan that includes completing the West Bank security barrier and “physically separating” the Palestinian villages surrounding Jerusalem from the capital.

...

In a move that many considered a sharp turn to the right for the leader of the Zionist Union — a party comprising the stalwart center-left Labor and Tzipi Livni’s dovish Hatnua — Herzog said he saw the need “to complete the security barrier around all of the settlement blocs.”

He said that routing the fence around the blocs would both protect the people living there from attacks and send a message to the Palestinians that they will remain a part of Israel in any future negotiations.




There is zero daylight between Zionist Union and Likud, and there is zero daylight between the Israeli mainstream and Cruz/Rubio on the subject.

Herzog is merely a wimpy version of Bibi. He might as well join the coalition now that the two-state solution is officially dead to the Israelis.

Obama's I/P policy has been a grand folly, trying to save Israel from itself.
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Herzog: For now, two-state solution unrealistic (Original Post) geek tragedy Jan 2016 OP
Do Hillary and Bernie hold views similar to yours on Israel ? King_David Jan 2016 #1
They do not hold views similar to any mainstream party in Israel nt geek tragedy Jan 2016 #2
I don't think you can substantiate that.. King_David Jan 2016 #3
Herzog has the same policy vis a vis the Palestinians as Netanyahu-he opposes geek tragedy Jan 2016 #4
Reallyyyyy King_David Jan 2016 #7
From October 2015: "Clinton: Push for two-state solution" geek tragedy Jan 2016 #8
From January 6, 2016 geek tragedy Jan 2016 #10
Clutching at straws..... King_David Jan 2016 #13
Herzog? Obama says same thing. November 2015... shira Jan 2016 #12
Of course it is - the Palestinians chose to stab it to death. Fozzledick Jan 2016 #5
yeah yeah, I know, Israel is completely blameless, everything is somebody else's fault, geek tragedy Jan 2016 #6
You should take your own words to heart. You're blaming Israel 100%, Palestinians 0%. shira Jan 2016 #9
White House Admits Israeli-Palestinian Two-State Solution Not Possible Before Obama Leaves Office shira Jan 2016 #11
Herzog the one-stater has spoken. Little Tich Jan 2016 #14
One-stater? Which 2 state solution have you ever advocated for? shira Jan 2016 #15
Obama certainly said nothing even remotely similar to what Herzog said. Little Tich Jan 2016 #16
Sure he did - and I don't see why you're upset since you're against every possible.... shira Jan 2016 #17
I'm not the one-stater in this thread. Little Tich Jan 2016 #18
If you're not the 1-stater, then name a 2-state solution since 1937 you'd support. n/t shira Jan 2016 #20
Ask yourself why now geek tragedy...... Israeli Jan 2016 #19
his idea of toughness is to be Netanyahu-Lite. geek tragedy Jan 2016 #21

King_David

(14,851 posts)
3. I don't think you can substantiate that..
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 06:27 PM
Jan 2016

Truth is that both Bernie and Hillary and Obama would not and hopefully will not have any problems with Zionist Union party at all ... None, Nada , Zilch ... And you know it ... Whereas extremist views on Israel similar to a handful of DUrs will never see the light of day with Bernie , Hillary or Obama .... EVER !!!

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
4. Herzog has the same policy vis a vis the Palestinians as Netanyahu-he opposes
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 07:10 PM
Jan 2016

negotiations for a Palestinian state.

That is not Bernie's policy. It's not Hillary's stated policy.

King_David

(14,851 posts)
7. Reallyyyyy
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 08:52 PM
Jan 2016

Enlighten us on Hillary and Bernie policy on Israel .... You could ask Mondoweiss for a primer if you want.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
10. From January 6, 2016
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 08:58 PM
Jan 2016
http://www.jewishjournal.com/opinion/article/hillary_clinton_taking_the_u.s._israel_relationship_to_the_next_level

Only a two-state solution negotiated between the parties can provide Palestinians independence, sovereignty, and dignity, and provide Israelis the secure and recognized borders of a democratic Jewish state. As difficult as it is, everyone has to do their part to rebuild trust and create the conditions for progress. Israelis and Palestinians should demand their leaders seek every opportunity to demonstrate commitment to peace.


This puts her in disagreement with Netanyahu's Mini-Me, Herzog.

Fozzledick

(3,860 posts)
5. Of course it is - the Palestinians chose to stab it to death.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 08:25 PM
Jan 2016

Every time they've been offered negotiations toward a peaceful two state solution, they've walked out, resumed a campaign of terrorism, and bragged about their unwillingness to accept any negotiated compromise. This is what they have chosen.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
6. yeah yeah, I know, Israel is completely blameless, everything is somebody else's fault,
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 08:48 PM
Jan 2016

Congratulations on choosing the only perfect country on the planet to root for

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
9. You should take your own words to heart. You're blaming Israel 100%, Palestinians 0%.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 08:57 PM
Jan 2016

Yet here you are accusing your opponents of the same in reverse.

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
11. White House Admits Israeli-Palestinian Two-State Solution Not Possible Before Obama Leaves Office
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 09:44 PM
Jan 2016

WASHINGTON -- The White House has assessed that a two-state solution between Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories is not likely to happen before President Barack Obama leaves office.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/obama-no-two-state-solution_us_563beb36e4b0307f2cacdb00

Little Tich

(6,171 posts)
14. Herzog the one-stater has spoken.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 01:10 AM
Jan 2016

Postponing the creation of a Palestinian state indefinitely, while at the same time building more settlements and fencing in the Palestinians is the one-state solution.

Interestingly, a move to postpone a two-state solution also opens up for BDS of Israel proper, and not just the settlements. If a Palestinian state isn't even possible in theory, there's only one state, and the people living in Gaza and the West Bank are just Israelis without citizenship. This means that Apartheid in the West Bank is the same as if it happened in "pre-1967" Israel.

I don't buy settlement products, but I do buy Israeli products, because there's a difference. But if Israel implements a de facto one-state solution, there's no difference between the settlements and Israel. All of Israel will suddenly become an Apartheid state.

I don't want Israel to become an Apartheid state, but the crazy talk of opposition politicians makes me fear that there's no real alternative to Netanyahu and the one-state solution he's working so hard to become real.

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
15. One-stater? Which 2 state solution have you ever advocated for?
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 07:10 AM
Jan 2016

And as you can see in 2 posts here, Obama said the same thing as Herzog.

So is Obama now a 1-stater for Apartheid too?

How silly.

Little Tich

(6,171 posts)
16. Obama certainly said nothing even remotely similar to what Herzog said.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 08:51 AM
Jan 2016

Obama was forced to downgrade his expectations simply because Netanyahu thwarted him at every turn. Herzog only hopes that Obama or anyone else with the silly notion that a Palestinian state is needed just gives up and stops trying to butt in.

It seems as if both the Israeli ruling coalition and the opposition are pleased to create a binational state by slowly building away any chance for a Palestinian state. The rest of the world including the present and any future American President can only helplessly watch it happen.

Netanyahu has won, he's killed the Palestinian state, permanently.

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
17. Sure he did - and I don't see why you're upset since you're against every possible....
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 07:41 PM
Jan 2016

....two-state scenario that leaves Israel intact.

Just because the Palestinans reject every offer Israel makes doesn't mean it's Israel's fault there aren't 2 states. Besides, it's never been the Palestinians' intention (PLO, Hamas) that Israel remain a Jewish state alongside Palestine in peace. That's not Israel's fault.

Little Tich

(6,171 posts)
18. I'm not the one-stater in this thread.
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 01:38 AM
Jan 2016

I just think it's wrong to implement measures that make the two-state solution less possible, rather than implementing measures that make the two-state solution more possible. Netanyahu's way is the way to the (Apartheid) one-state solution, and I'm against that.

Israeli

(4,151 posts)
19. Ask yourself why now geek tragedy......
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 04:52 AM
Jan 2016

Herzog is feeling threatened politically so he is trying to be the ' tuf guy ' and to loose the ' wimp ' image that he holds amongst most Israelis ....including his own voter base ....

United Centrist Party With Ex-general Ashkenazi Could Oust Netanyahu, Poll Suggests

Should former IDF chief join forces with center-left Yesh Atid and center-right Kulanu party to form single political ticket, they would win more Knesset seats than the Likud, TV polls say.

Haaretz Jan 21, 2016

A centrist party that includes former chief of General Staff Gabi Ashkenazi, Yesh Atid chairman Yair Lapid, and Kulanu chairman Moshe Kahlon would get 29 Knesset seats in a general election, compared to only 24 for Likud, according to a poll released Thursday night by Channel 10 news.

According to a poll by Channel 2, the public believes that Ashkenazi had a better chance of defeating Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in an election than Zionist Union chairman Isaac Herzog or Lapid, but still find Netanyahu more suitable to be prime minister.  

With no election in sight, both surveys were released in wake of Attorney General Yehuda Weinstein's decision Wednesday to close the criminal investigation into Ashkenazi and a number of former IDF officials in what has become known as the Harpaz affair, a convoluted scandal surrounding the process of selecting Ashkenazi’s successor. Police had recommended that Ashkenazi be charged with obstructing justice.

According to the Channel 10 poll, conducted by Prof. Camil Fuchs, if Ashkenazi, Lapid, and Kahlon band together to form a new centrist party, that party would get 29 seats should the elections be held now. Likud would get 24, Zionist Union, 13, the Joint Arab List, 13, Habayit Hayehudi 12, and Yisrael Beiteinu, 10.

Participants were also asked about a scenario in which Ashkenazi assumes chairmanship of Zionist Union. In that case, Zionist Union would get 18 seats and the Likud 27. Habayit Hayehudi and the Joint List would each get 13, Yisrael Beiteinu, nine, and Kulanu and Shas, seven seats each.

If Ashkenazi were to run as Lapid’s No. 2 in Yesh Atid, the party would get 19 seats. The Likud would lead with 26 seats, and Zionist Union would get 14. 

Channel 2’s poll was conducted by Mano Geva and Mina Zemach of the Midgam Institute, in conjunction with Ipanel, an online survey community. Asked whether Netanyahu or Ashkenazi was more suited to be prime minister, 41 percent said Netanyahu and 16 percent said Ashkenazi. More than 31 percent responded that neither was suitable. 

Asked who was most suited to leading Zionist Union, 38 percent said Ashkenazi and 18 percent chose Herzog. Asked, “Who among the following people has the best chance to defeat Netanyahu if he would be a party’s candidate for prime minister,” Ashkenazi was chosen by 29 percent, compared to 24 percent for Lapid. Herzog got only 8 percent.

Source: http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.698881

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
21. his idea of toughness is to be Netanyahu-Lite.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 12:19 PM
Jan 2016

Labor needs a real leader, not a limp noodle like Bougie.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Herzog: For now, two-stat...