I wonder if people here will defend that collateral damage.

You should alert on that post.

You should ask her why this obscenity is tolerated on DU.

If a jury did not remove it, perhaps it wasn't against tos.

And besides, not every obscenity is alertable (not necessarily a comment on your post). We have rules.

for the deaths of the 3 Israeli hostages that the IDF shot. The cause was the IDF did not follow their own rules. The closet cause is teh IDF's actions. In a court, the deaths would not be upon Hamas.

And why is your imagination preoccupied with preemptively expecting people here coming to defense of your imaginary outcome to your imaginary scenario?

I said that flooding the tunnels to flush out hamas will kill the hostages, too. That's why. And I'm only answering this question you pose to show I'm not one sided. I'm concerned for all innocent victims of this horrible tragedy.

You said what you said and, in case YOU didn't read what you posted, here it is:
" Is this one of the tunnels Israel flooded? I wonder if people here will defend that collateral damage".

It's quite impossible to spin.

And now that we are done with deflecting, answer the questions: Of all the possibilities, why is this the first thing that comes to your mind? And why is your imagination preoccupied with preemptively expecting people here coming to defense of your imaginary outcome to your imaginary scenario?

sure don't show very much outrage over the IDF killing hostages. 99% of your outrage goes to one side only.

Why are people differentiating the wartime acts of Hamas vs those of Israel? Is there anything Hamas can do that will be called out? Anything Israel may have done NOT get called out?

Come on people. Let’s show a little balance here. We need to get together on this.

Flooding may not have subsided by now, and I'd say you'd see signs of it that nobody bothered to mention.

No word on how many tunnels have been flooded that I've seen.