Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Richard D

(8,757 posts)
Sun Apr 14, 2024, 10:34 PM Apr 14

Five lies about the Iran attack on Israel

Avi Mayer אבי מאיר
@AviMayer

Let's dispense with a few lies you will likely hear in the coming days:

Lie #1: "Israel started this with its airstrike in Damascus."

False. Iran has been maintaining a constant assault on Israel for decades via its proxies in the region – chief among them Hezbollah, which is wholly funded, armed, and controlled by the Iranian regime. That assault has only intensified since October 7. Hezbollah has fired rockets and missiles into northern Israel on a near-daily basis for more than six months, causing the depopulation of much of northern Israel. Tens of thousands of Israelis have not seen their homes in half a year due to this Iranian-directed assault; many of their homes no longer exist, having been destroyed by Hezbollah's rockets. The Houthis, another Iranian proxy group based in Yemen, have also fired numerous missiles at southern Israel. Finally, Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad have been funded, armed, and trained by Iran for years and the Iranian regime views the Palestinian terror groups as part of its offensive efforts against Israel. There has not been a single day in the past six months in which Iran, via its various proxies in the region, has not attacked Israel. The airstrike in Damascus targeted individuals directly responsible for Iran's ongoing assault on the Jewish state.

Lie #2: "The target of Israel's airstrike in Damascus was a diplomatic facility."

False. The notion that the target of the Damascus airstrike was a mere "Iranian consulate" is laughable. The building was a local headquarters of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), a branch of the Iranian military that has been designated as a terrorist organization by the United States and multiple other countries. Those killed were senior figures in the IRGC, including Brigadier General Mohammad Reza Zahedi, a senior commander in the IRGC's foreign operations unit who was responsible for liaising with Hezbollah, and his deputy, General Mohammad Hadi Hajriahim. Five other IRGC officers were killed in the airstrike, as were five Iranian-affiliated militiamen, one Hezbollah operative, one Iranian military advisor, and two apparent civilians. The airstrike was aimed at military figures in a military facility and the targets were directly involved in orchestrating attacks on Israel. The fact that the building was adjacent to the Iranian embassy does not change its military character.

Lie #3: "Israel carried out the Damascus airstrike in order to provoke a wider war."

False. For months, Israel has limited its military response to the ongoing assault by Iranian proxy groups to tit-for-tat airstrikes and artillery fire directly targeting the sources of the attacks. The reality, however, is that large swaths of northern Israel have been uninhabitable due to the ongoing Hezbollah attacks, which are being directed by the group's patron, Iran. The only way to force Hezbollah to stop its assault on northern Israel and restore calm is to target the Iranian military officials behind the attacks. That is what the Damascus airstrike was intended to do: to end the impunity enjoyed by Iranian military officials as they oversee ongoing attacks targeting the people of Israel.

Lie #4: "Any Israeli response will cause the situation to escalate further."

False. The unprecedented Iranian assault on Israel, which involved hundreds of missiles and drones, was the escalation. It has been roundly condemned around the world. Israel will respond to this unparalleled act of aggression as any sovereign country would, not least in order to deter the Iranian regime from carrying out further attacks against Israeli territory and send the message that Israel will not tolerate massive attacks on its sovereign territory by a foreign state.

Lie #5: "The relatively limited damage from the Iranian attack means it's no big deal and Israel should let it go."

False. The Iranian assault was absolutely unprecedented in its scope and severity. The only reason it didn't cause widespread damage and massive casualties is because Israel and its allies have, for years, invested billions of dollars in developing sophisticated air defense systems against the threat posed by Iran. Most of the missiles and drones were intercepted before they reached Israel's borders because Israel and its allies were prepared for them. But make no mistake: this Iranian attack was meant to rain death and destruction on the people of Israel. If Israel doesn't respond, it will open the door to further and more severe attacks by Iran, which has stated its desire and intention to destroy the Jewish state on numerous occasions. No other country would be asked to put up with that. Neither should Israel.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Five lies about the Iran attack on Israel (Original Post) Richard D Apr 14 OP
I see a lot of articles scroll across my home page, gab13by13 Apr 14 #1
Or maybe it was truth not telling. 3Hotdogs Apr 15 #2
Where did you read he had been fired? N/T lapucelle Apr 15 #3
What is the second thing you look for? Beastly Boy Apr 15 #4
What about that Iran gave warning to US and Israel? elias7 Apr 15 #5
US says that wasn't so Richard D Apr 15 #6

gab13by13

(21,378 posts)
1. I see a lot of articles scroll across my home page,
Sun Apr 14, 2024, 11:19 PM
Apr 14

the first thing I look at is who wrote the article?

Who is Avi Mayer? What he says may be true but why was he just fired from the Jerusalem Post? Maybe it was for truth telling? I don't know?

Richard D

(8,757 posts)
6. US says that wasn't so
Mon Apr 15, 2024, 10:12 PM
Apr 15

WASHINGTON/BAGHDAD/DUBAI, April 14 (Reuters) - "Turkish, Jordanian and Iraqi officials said on Sunday that Iran gave wide notice days before its drone and missile attack on Israel, but U.S. officials said Tehran did not warn Washington and that it was aiming to cause significant damage."

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/iranian-notice-attack-may-have-dampened-escalation-risks-2024-04-14/

The only reason there was so little physical damage was that Israel has the Iron Dome and received a lot of international help. Without that, it would have been a devastating attack. Plus, the cost of the defense was about 1 billion dollars. That alone is a lot of damage. This was not in any way a proportional and innocent tit-for-tat attack. I wonder what would have happened had the defense not been so ironclad. I believe some or many of the missiles were aimed at Jerusalem. What if the al-Aqsa mosque was destroyed? Whew. boggles the mind.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Five lies about the Iran ...