Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Israeli

(4,151 posts)
Thu Mar 28, 2013, 04:04 AM Mar 2013

The Israeli negotiator who thinks the two-state solution is still possible

Veteran Israeli negotiator Shaul Arieli discusses the failure of the Oslo Accords, various Israeli prime ministers’ commitment (or lack thereof) to ending the occupation, and the only solution he believes both sides could live with, however unsatisfied they might be with it.


Shaul Arieli is a man on a dual mission: educating Israelis about the conflict and diplomatic process with the Palestinians, and making the point that the two-state solution is both possible and necessary. His latest publication in Hebrew, A Border between Us and You (Yeditoth Ahronoth Books 2013), is a 500-page handbook to the history of the conflict, with an emphasis on the diplomatic and political process. It is written in very simple (and sometimes simplistic) language, with lots of maps, tables and even entries describing notable leaders on both sides. Arieli was thinking about Israeli teenagers when he wrote his book, but lately I find myself going back to it again and again to find a figure or to check historical details for one of my posts.

I asked Shaul Arieli for an interview in order to gain more first-hand knowledge and analysis of the history of the negotiations, including what’s really behind terms like “settlements blocs” and “land swaps.” Lately, the mere idea of talks has been put under scrutiny (much of it justified, in my opinion), so I wanted to know what went wrong in the past, and have we, as some claim, “passed the point of no return” with regards to the two-state solution (check out, for example, this piece by Ben Birnbaum in TNR).


http://972mag.com/the-israeli-negotiator-who-thinks-the-two-state-solution-is-still-possible/68259/

Very good interview with Shaul Arieli , anyone that is interested about the diplomatic process with the Palestinians or the chances for a solution, instead of bashing either side, should read this .
39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Israeli negotiator who thinks the two-state solution is still possible (Original Post) Israeli Mar 2013 OP
Very interesting interview. Fantastic Anarchist Mar 2013 #1
Everyone should read this... shaayecanaan Mar 2013 #2
I believe that there is plenty of good in Israel, but like during Bush II R. Daneel Olivaw Mar 2013 #3
There are plenty moderates left folks Israeli Mar 2013 #4
I'm a supporter of the OneVoice movement; I think it is a real beacon of hope! LeftishBrit Mar 2013 #10
so do I Israeli Mar 2013 #11
and unfortunately even fewer in positions of true power azurnoir Mar 2013 #6
From the OP, for shira. Jefferson23 Mar 2013 #5
For shira !!! ??? Israeli Mar 2013 #8
Are you Jewish? Mosby Mar 2013 #12
I'm an Israeli Israeli Mar 2013 #15
you're a leftist, i'm a liberal shira Mar 2013 #13
your American Israeli Mar 2013 #19
How do you define the difference between 'leftist' and 'liberal'? LeftishBrit Apr 2013 #30
shame you never got an answer Israeli Apr 2013 #31
Familiar with the Euston Manifesto? shira Apr 2013 #32
Both the supporters and opponents of this manifesto are a very diverse group LeftishBrit Apr 2013 #34
She knows why I highlighted that for her..I have no delusions about shira, none. n/t Jefferson23 Mar 2013 #14
Ok , good Israeli Mar 2013 #16
Liberals do not share the same values w/ extreme Rightists as you all do... shira Mar 2013 #17
yes I will answer you Israeli Mar 2013 #20
You "try to understand them". Okay, so help me understand MachsomWatch..... shira Mar 2013 #21
you help me understand first Israeli Mar 2013 #23
Heck, I don't understand the whackadoodle settlers either.... shira Mar 2013 #24
you dont understand the whackadoodle settlers ? Israeli Mar 2013 #25
You're evading the question... shira Mar 2013 #26
I'm not evading the question shira Israeli Apr 2013 #27
You were dehumanizing the victims. As to MachsomWatch entering the village.... shira Apr 2013 #28
whatever shira Israeli Apr 2013 #29
What's really disturbing is your dehumanization of the Fogels... shira Apr 2013 #33
You think American Jews should have no connection to Israel ? nt King_David Apr 2013 #35
I think Israeli Apr 2013 #36
They have no vote at the moment King_David Apr 2013 #37
correct Israeli Apr 2013 #39
Shaul Arieli is one of the designers of the Geneva Initiative azurnoir Mar 2013 #7
Thanks for posting this! Very interestng. I'm a big admirer of Shaul Arieli. LeftishBrit Mar 2013 #9
Of course it's still possible, to the dismay of the 1-staters! n/t shira Mar 2013 #18
It will only be possible... ocpagu Mar 2013 #22
yep as long as the Palestinians are willing to give up lots more than they get azurnoir Apr 2013 #38

shaayecanaan

(6,068 posts)
2. Everyone should read this...
Thu Mar 28, 2013, 07:45 AM
Mar 2013

This man is a very sensible Israeli. Frankly there are not many of them left.

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
3. I believe that there is plenty of good in Israel, but like during Bush II
Thu Mar 28, 2013, 10:54 AM
Mar 2013

there were plenty of good Americans who frankly were just drowned out.

Israel has their right wingers pushing the buttons, and until their sensible public makes a stand they will remain in the Bush III column.

Israeli

(4,151 posts)
4. There are plenty moderates left folks
Thu Mar 28, 2013, 01:01 PM
Mar 2013

just not in this Government ,

trying to think of examples to give you and staying away from the politicians this is a group I'm involved with :

http://www.onevoicemovement.org/

OneVoice is an international grassroots movement that amplifies the voice of mainstream Israelis and Palestinians, empowering them to propel their elected representatives toward the two-state solution. The Movement works to forge consensus for conflict resolution and build a human infrastructure capable of mobilizing the people toward a negotiated, comprehensive and permanent agreement between Israel and Palestine that ends the occupation, ensures security and peace for both sides, and solves all final-status issues in accordance with international law and previous bilateral agreements. The 1967 borders form the basis for the establishment of an independent, viable Palestinian state, with permanent borders and any modifications to be agreed upon by both parties. The Movement recognizes that violence by either side will never be a means to end the conflict.

LeftishBrit

(41,205 posts)
10. I'm a supporter of the OneVoice movement; I think it is a real beacon of hope!
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 09:20 AM
Mar 2013

Do you have direct contact with any of the other organizations listed under here:

http://www.allmep.org

Israeli

(4,151 posts)
11. so do I
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 12:27 PM
Mar 2013

these organizations :
http://www.allmep.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=5&Itemid=4

I've heard of most of them , have had direct contact with the Givat Haviva Educational Foundation , been to many a seminar there its not far from where I live. Our kibbutz is from the same federation ...
the Kibbutz Artzi Movement , HaShomer HaTzair .

Had some contact with Keshev in the past .

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
5. From the OP, for shira.
Thu Mar 28, 2013, 02:06 PM
Mar 2013
I will quote Olmert himself: the Palestinians never refused. They didn’t accept some of our proposals, just as we didn’t accept some of theirs. Israelis think that Olmert gave “a generous offer” to the Palestinians. But the Palestinians would say the same. Mahmoud Abbas was ready for land swaps that would leave 75 percent of the settlers under Israeli authority, including in neighborhoods in East Jerusalem. Abbas went a long way toward Israel on every issue.

Where do you think Netanyahu stands?

Olmert was able to set the four terms of reference that the international community would agree to: a relatively demilitarized Palestinian state (the Palestinians want “a state with limited arms” but the idea is similar), 1967 borders, partition in Jerusalem, and a return to the Palestinian state and not to Israel proper.

Then Netanyahu came, and he had tremendous experience and knowledge on these issues. After all, he took pride once in his ability to kill the Oslo process.


K&R, thanks for posting.

Israeli

(4,151 posts)
8. For shira !!! ???
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 07:06 AM
Mar 2013

Your wasting your time and effort Jefferson23
shira is no moderate
she is also not Israeli she is American , she is defending her religion
cant expect reason and facts to get in the way now can you ?

Israeli

(4,151 posts)
15. I'm an Israeli
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 06:04 AM
Mar 2013

Mosby
and I'm an atheist

I'm with Yoram Kaniuk :


The author Yoram Kaniuk is expected to ask the Tel Aviv District Court this morning to order the Interior Ministry to permit him to "leave the Jewish religion" by altering his entry under the heading "religion" in the Population Registry. Kaniuk wants any official state document on which he appears as "Jewish" to be changed to "Without Religion."

An earlier request to the Interior Ministry was turned down and Kaniuk explains in his petition that he does not wish to be part of a "Jewish Iran" or belong to "what is today called the religion of Israel."

Because the State of Israel does not recognize the Jewish nationality they suggested at the Interior Ministry that I convert to Christianity or Islam, but to be a member of the Jewish nation without the religion is impossible.


http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/israeli-author-yoram-kaniuk-asks-court-to-cancel-his-jewish-status-1.361720

Already posted as a reply to shira which she conveniently ignored,see :

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1134&pid=36730

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
13. you're a leftist, i'm a liberal
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 01:49 PM
Mar 2013

I'm for 2 states for 2 people and would've been delighted to see the Palestinians accept the Clinton Initiatives, Geneva, or Olmert's offer.

I doubt you'd say the same, making you the extremist.

Israeli

(4,151 posts)
19. your American
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:27 PM
Mar 2013

and you do not understand us at all shira

I'm for 2 states for 2 people and would've been delighted to see the Palestinians accept the Clinton Initiatives, Geneva, or Olmert's offer.

I doubt you'd say the same, making you the extremist.


Then I suggest you read all of my posts up until now because I am not a one stater shira and I have already stated why not .

LeftishBrit

(41,205 posts)
30. How do you define the difference between 'leftist' and 'liberal'?
Mon Apr 1, 2013, 09:16 AM
Apr 2013

You seem to assume that leftists are one-staters and liberals are two-staters; or that leftists are anti-Zionists and liberals are Zionists - or what? Or are you simply using 'leftist' as an insult?

As far as I'm concerned, the difference between the terms is primarily economic. A liberal supports a predominantly free-market capitalist economic system, but, unlike a right-winger, does support a safety-net for those who cannot manage in the free market. A leftist supports an economic system that emphasizes the public sector - at the extreme (communism) without any private sector at all; but more usually a mixed economy where the public sector plays a prominent role. There may be some correlation between liberal vs leftist views on economics and positive or negative views about Israel, but views on Israel certainly don't define or determine whether someone is a liberal or a leftist, or the other way round for that matter.

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
32. Familiar with the Euston Manifesto?
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 07:39 AM
Apr 2013
http://eustonmanifesto.org/the-euston-manifesto/

The "leftists" who tend to have the most problems with the manifesto are the ones I have the most issues with. Call them whatever you wish: hard left, leftwing fascists, marxists, stalinists....

What would you call them?

LeftishBrit

(41,205 posts)
34. Both the supporters and opponents of this manifesto are a very diverse group
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 11:13 AM
Apr 2013

Signatories range from some excellent progressives to some fairly disgusting people; so I'm sure do its opponents, depending on their reasons for opposition. I cannot support it in its full form because it supported the Iraq war, and some of its signatories do so to this day. Also one of the main signatories was Gisela Stuart, MP, a MONSTER in my opinion because she went out of her way to express support for Bush over Kerry in 2004. (Ironically, if I lived in her constituency, I would have had no choice but to vote for her, as she is technically Labour, with a relatively narrow majority over the Tories who are even worse monsters.)

I do agree with the basic economic and social attitudes of the manifesto (e.g. pro-trade union, anti-poverty, liberal on most social issues).

At any rate, you don't need to be a Marxist, Stalinist, or even a left-winger at all, to have been firmly opposed to the Iraq war from the beginning. Most people in the UK were!

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
17. Liberals do not share the same values w/ extreme Rightists as you all do...
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 07:06 AM
Mar 2013

Demonizing & Dehumanizing Jews on a daily basis.

Not giving a rip about Arabs unless Israel can be blamed.

Using Palestinian kids (as the ISM does) as child militants who oppose IDF soldiers.

Essentially doing the anti-Israel bidding of extreme, totalitarian regimes (Syria, Iran, Gaza, etc..)

In favor of RoR and eventually 1-state (Arab majority Palestine) ruled via sharia law, etc...

===============

Let's not pretend there's any difference b/w the extreme Left and extreme Right, all coordinating and working together, all with the same goals....

===============

So tell me, Israeli, were and are you still a supporter of the ISM, FreeGaza flotillas, and BDS movement? You know, being the good leftwing liberal/progressive you say you are? Or are you appalled by their actions?

Do you agree w/ your fellow advocates like Judith Butler of BDS that Hamas and Hezbollah are part of the progressive, global Left?

Will you answer these questions, or dodge them? I notice this a lot from you and your peers...never really willing to discuss what you actually believe and advocate for.

Israeli

(4,151 posts)
20. yes I will answer you
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:45 PM
Mar 2013
So tell me, Israeli, were and are you still a supporter of the ISM, FreeGaza flotillas, and BDS movement? You know, being the good leftwing liberal/progressive you say you are? Or are you appalled by their actions?

Do you agree w/ your fellow advocates like Judith Butler of BDS that Hamas and Hezbollah are part of the progressive, global Left?


Never been a supporter of the ISM, FreeGaza flotillas, and BDS movement shira

" liberal/progressive " is not a term we use , its an American term .

I am not " appalled by their actions " , I try to understand them .

Hamas and Hezbollah are religious fundamentalists shira not much between them and our own fundies like Yigal Amir etc etc etc .

I do support Machsomwatch an organization you have already stated you dont trust :
http://www.machsomwatch.org/en

So excuse me if I dont trust you shira .
 

shira

(30,109 posts)
21. You "try to understand them". Okay, so help me understand MachsomWatch.....
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 01:25 PM
Mar 2013

...when this was happening at the time of the arrests of the Fogel murderers:

Israeli

(4,151 posts)
23. you help me understand first
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 03:33 PM
Mar 2013

the settlement of Itamar :

Bnei Akiva youth against Rabin memorial

Students from settlement of Itamar demand that youth movement's secretary-general cancel his participation in rally commemorating slain prime minister, accuse him of contributing to commemoration of 'heritage which led to the murder of many Israelis'

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4297411,00.html

Yitzhak Rabin: A Peacemaker Who’s Legacy Still Divides

The event was notable not just for its immense crowds but for the presence for the first time of a representative from Bnei Akiva, the national religious youth movement ideologically opposed to Rabin’s Labor Party and the Oslo Accords, which the general-turned-peacemaker signed with late Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat.

Some within Bnei Akiva were not happy about the representative’s decision to speak at the event. Pinchas Michaeli, the head of the branch in the settlement of Itamar, wrote of “the deep shock and sadness” that members of his movement felt when hearing of the decision, according to the Jerusalem Post.

“Yitzhak Rabin as prime minister worked, advanced and strove to create an Arab entity which works tirelessly to destroy the State of Israel,” Michaeli added.

The debate is nothing new. Rabin was a divisive figure in Israeli politics for signing the Oslo Accords, which right-wingers viewed as overly conciliatory to the Palestinians and creating a security threat to the Israeli state.


"We have here unprecedented political radicalization. We've gone farther than ever and now it turns out that the murder was just a stop on the way. The violence has become more widespread; mosques are torched, churches are damaged,” she said of the “price-tag” phenomena.

Rabin Yaakov warned that if radicalization amid some sections within Israeli society isn’t stopped, her brother’s murder might become “illegitimate,” the Israeli public “apathetic,” and Yigal Amir, the gunman, might be “released from prison.”

"Yizthak's murder didn't happen in a vacuum," she said. "It was preceded by incitement and a terrible atmosphere that was foreign to the Israeli society and culture I knew.”

Rabin Yaakov’s words come months after the release from prison of the killer’s brother, Hagai Amir, who assisted in the assassination. He told reporters in May that he had no regrets, adding, “I am proud of what I did.”


http://www.jspace.com/news/articles/yitzhak-rabin-a-peacemaker-who-s-legacy-still-divides/11510

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
24. Heck, I don't understand the whackadoodle settlers either....
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 06:12 AM
Mar 2013

I'm no fan of extremists of any type, be they rightwing or left, Jewish, Christian, Muslim, or Atheist. They should all be put on an island together to sort their problems out. Unfortunately a big island will be required, probably a continent. Maybe several continents...

What was your point of bringing that up?

And how about that episode with Machsom Watch?

Israeli

(4,151 posts)
25. you dont understand the whackadoodle settlers ?
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 08:24 AM
Mar 2013
"What was your point of bringing that up? "

so that you might start to understand the whackadoodle settlers ?

"And how about that episode with Machsom Watch?"

because its all connected shira .

Itamar and its neighbor Yitzhar are amongst the most extreme of the religious settlements , so extreme they both celebrated the night Rabin was murdered .

Now go read this :
http://972mag.com/the-itamar-victimization-dance-is-disgusting/

and then go study up on the village of Awarta.
 

shira

(30,109 posts)
26. You're evading the question...
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 11:52 AM
Mar 2013

Yes, some settlers are so extreme, they are thugs and terrorists themselves. It's a big problem and the law should come down harder on them.

So does this mean the Fogels are just as extreme & had it coming to them - the little children included? And that it's natural for Machsom Watch members to console the mother of the 2 boys who murdered them? A mother who not only helped to cover up what her sons did, but later said she was proud of them?

Israeli

(4,151 posts)
27. I'm not evading the question shira
Mon Apr 1, 2013, 01:18 AM
Apr 2013

The Fogels lived in Itamar they moved there from Gush Katif , they could have moved to Israel proper but chose to live on land that does not belong to them in a settlement know for its extremism .

Did you read the link I gave you ?

" As if someone has to earnestly explain he objects to the slaughtering of infants... "

Machsom Watch was in the village to monitor the human rights of all of the inhabitants who were being collectively punished both by the IDF and the settlers ....a week before the names of the suspects were published

Its a smear campaign by the right against the left and if you cant see that and you see something wrong in a Israeli woman comforting a Palestinian woman then I feel sorry for you shira.

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
28. You were dehumanizing the victims. As to MachsomWatch entering the village....
Mon Apr 1, 2013, 05:52 AM
Apr 2013

...they did so after the investigation was concluded and after the killers had already re-enacted the murder in Itamar.

Here's Yaakov Lozowick, and it cannot be said he's a right-winger or lover of extreme settlers....

The story of the investigation was under a gag order for a month, until its successful conclusion. Still, Israel being the very small place it is, anybody who cared to know had a pretty good idea what was going on. In brief, immediately after the murder trackers identified tracks of the suspected murderers from Itamar to the nearby town of Awarta. We now know that the two suspected murderers walked back home after the massacre of the Fogel family, where a number of their friends and relatives burned their clothes and hid their weapons near Ramallah. The investigators, who had reason to believe the murderers and potential accomplices were in town, but couldn't yet have known who, how many, how well armed, and if they intended to murder again, sealed off the town and began to investigate. At a minimum, the investigators knew the murderers had the two M-16's stolen from Itamar. At one point they collected DNA samples from most of the men. Had anyone come forward and admitted their part in the massacre the investigation would have been greatly expedited, but this didn't happen, so the investigators had to find their men in a hostile environment. They succeeded in less than a month. The week before the gag order was lifted the suspected murderers were brought to Itamar to re-enact the murder, so everyone in Itamar knew they'd been caught; soon, everyone else who cared knew, too, even if the precise identities of the murderers were not yet known.

At this point a delegation of radical Israeli leftists visited the town: after the investigation, mind you, since as they openly said in their subsequent reports, during the investigation itself they couldn't get in.


Read the rest here:
http://yaacovlozowick.blogspot.com/2011/04/radical-israelis-prefer-murderers.html

Israeli

(4,151 posts)
29. whatever shira
Mon Apr 1, 2013, 08:27 AM
Apr 2013

his report is wrong , I know who I believe and trust and they were in during the investigation
see here :

http://www.machsomwatch.org/en/news/02/05/2011/im_tirtzu_calls_criminal_investigation_machsom_watch

Quote :

The picture was taken about a week before the Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) revealed the identities of the suspects.

In response to Im Tirtzu, Yaron said on Sunday that Machsom Watch had visited the village just as many other human rights organizations had.

“I was there like other human rights organizations on April 11, a week before the names of the suspects were published, and there were no soldiers in the area, and therefore the claim that we disrupted the soldiers’ work is baseless,” she said.


Nothing I say is going to change your opinion anyhow .

Your pro settler and pro occupation shira , I'm anti settler and anti occupation
its like oil and water .





 

shira

(30,109 posts)
33. What's really disturbing is your dehumanization of the Fogels...
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 10:04 AM
Apr 2013

As if murdering them was rational and they all had it coming. Why else would you have explained how extreme some settlers are?

Yaron knew where she was, didn't she? She knew she was consoling the mother of one of the murderers, right?

Lastly, refusing to dehumanize settlers doesn't mean I'm pro-settler and pro-occupation. I would describe you and those like youthat way. After all, I'm for 2 states and would've been delighted had the Palestinians accepted either the Barak or Olmert offer (or Geneva). It appears you guys are against those deals. The occupation and settlements should've been over in 2000 or 2001. You and your friends are holding out for a better offer, more Israeli concessions...but where's that getting you? 12 years later and the settlements/occupation continues. But that's okay because those deals weren't fair, right?

Israeli

(4,151 posts)
36. I think
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 07:30 AM
Apr 2013

all Jews have a connection to Israel
and that it is based on religion
if it was based on Nationalism
then we would not be having this conversation because both you and shira would be living here .
As far as I am concerned American Jews can have their say, on one condition .... that they are never allowed to take part in our election process .

King_David

(14,851 posts)
37. They have no vote at the moment
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 06:00 PM
Apr 2013

And it's true you can not be a true Zionist without making Aliyah .. Agreed

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
7. Shaul Arieli is one of the designers of the Geneva Initiative
Thu Mar 28, 2013, 04:22 PM
Mar 2013

something that we've seen supported here by Israel's supporters recently, especially since the UNGA decision on November 29 2012

http://www.geneva-accord.org/mainmenu/col-ret-shaul-arieli

 

ocpagu

(1,954 posts)
22. It will only be possible...
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 02:40 PM
Mar 2013

...when and after Israel gets rid of the far right lunatics who are currently ruining the country's reputation.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
38. yep as long as the Palestinians are willing to give up lots more than they get
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 06:09 PM
Apr 2013

but according to some here anything should be good enough for them

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»The Israeli negotiator wh...