Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Violet_Crumble

(35,961 posts)
Mon Nov 25, 2013, 05:57 AM Nov 2013

Australian shift on Israel 'part of more balanced approach' to Middle East

The foreign minister, Julie Bishop, has described the Australian government’s shift in favour of Israel on two key UN resolutions, including softening its stance on settlement expansion in the occupied territories, as part of a move towards a more “balanced” approach to the Middle East.

Australia now abstains on whether the Palestinian territories should be subject to the Geneva convention and on defining Israeli annexation of land in the occupied territories as in breach of international law. Under both previous prime ministers Australia had upheld the general assembly resolutions.

“This shift reflected the government’s concern that Middle East resolutions should be balanced,” the foreign minister said through a spokeswoman. “The government will not support resolutions which are one-sided and which prejudge the outcome of final-status negotiations between the two sides.”

Australia is now one of only eight nations to abstain on the resolution relating to Israeli settlement in the occupied territories and one of five to abstain on the Geneva convention resolution.

The stance has been criticised by the shadow foreign affairs minister, Tanya Plibersek, who said Australia’s position had shifted without debate or consultation.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/25/australian-shift-on-israel-part-of-more-balanced-approach-to-middle-east



It comes as no surprise that a RW government that's secretive and authoritarian would make such a sharp U-turn in policy and not bother telling the Australian people. Spying on Indonesia, now this, it makes me wonder what's coming next...
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Australian shift on Israel 'part of more balanced approach' to Middle East (Original Post) Violet_Crumble Nov 2013 OP
In general the English speaking world isn't making me proud. delrem Nov 2013 #1
What is a "shadow foreign affairs minister?" Laelth Nov 2013 #2
It's pretty much what you said... Violet_Crumble Nov 2013 #3
Nifty. Thanks for the response. n/t Laelth Nov 2013 #4
I don't think that they are reading the tea leaves very well... shaayecanaan Nov 2013 #5

Laelth

(32,017 posts)
2. What is a "shadow foreign affairs minister?"
Mon Nov 25, 2013, 07:14 AM
Nov 2013

Is that the person the opposition party would have made foreign minister if their party controlled the government?

Anybody know?



-Laelth

Violet_Crumble

(35,961 posts)
3. It's pretty much what you said...
Mon Nov 25, 2013, 07:31 AM
Nov 2013

I keep on forgetting that things don't work the same elsewhere...

Shadow ministers are members of the opposition, chosen by the Leader of the Opposition.

Shadow ministers have the important responsibility of scrutinising (closely examining) the work of the government and individual ministers. Each shadow minister concentrates on the work of a particular minister and government department. Shadow ministers also put forward and explain opposition policies.

Top-level shadow ministers form a Shadow Cabinet which meets regularly to develop these policies.

If there is a change of government a shadow minister may become a minister. This is why it is important for them to understand the work of the department they 'shadow' and consider how they would run their portfolio.

http://www.peo.gov.au/students/fact_sheets/ministers_shadow_ministers.html

shaayecanaan

(6,068 posts)
5. I don't think that they are reading the tea leaves very well...
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 03:43 AM
Nov 2013

Admittedly, they are mostly reverting to the stance that the conservatives took during the Howard/Downer years, but that was during the Second Intifada and the administration of George Bush. Instead you now have the US Secretary of State saying that the US does not accept the legitimacy of settlements, and the EU formulating guidelines on denying funding to NGOs involved in settlement enterprises.

They are already in trouble with the Indonesians, who will not like this either. Nor will the Malaysians.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Australian shift on Israe...