Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DUIC

(167 posts)
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 10:43 AM Feb 2012

Palestinian television still glorifies terror attacks against Israel

At certain moments, while watching a scene from a program broadcast by Palestinian television on October 25 of last year, it is difficult to believe that this is the official television channel of the Palestinian Authority and the PLO, and not that of Hamas or the Islamic Jihad.

And yet, the program in question features a "field report" by Palestinian television from Tulkarem, in order to relate the wonders of the master terrorist Abbas a-Said, who is jailed in Israel and was sentenced to 35 life sentences.

This is a man who was considered at the beginning of the previous decade the head of the military wing of Hamas in the town, and responsible for two of the harshest suicide bombings Israel has ever known, including the attack on the Park Hotel in Netanya and on the night of the Passover Seder in 2002.

The reporter, who works at a program dedicated to the families of prisoners, did not spare the superlatives: "We are outside the home of the warrior hero, the commander, the lion of the prison, Abbas a-Said."

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/palestinian-television-still-glorifies-terror-attacks-against-israel-1.413485

45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Palestinian television still glorifies terror attacks against Israel (Original Post) DUIC Feb 2012 OP
When can we expect the bombing to commence, before or after they "do" Iran? leveymg Feb 2012 #1
Why would the Palestinians bomb Iran? DUIC Feb 2012 #2
If the Israelis want to respond with bottle rockets and mortars, they're perfectly entitled to their leveymg Feb 2012 #3
Qassams and Grads are scarcely bottle rockets ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2012 #5
These "bottle rockets"... holdencaufield Feb 2012 #7
They're flying pipe bombs (literally). Not militarily effective. leveymg Feb 2012 #12
What total and utter nonsense ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2012 #40
Ok, it's like tossing 4 grenades 4 miles, and about as accurate. Happy now? leveymg Feb 2012 #42
Yes, they're just little bottle rockets & firecrackers. You keep telling yourself that... shira Feb 2012 #45
But you would presumably be outraged if Israel deliberately targeting Palestinian civilians... shira Feb 2012 #13
I'd be reassurred that far fewer of them would be killed if both used the same crude weapons leveymg Feb 2012 #14
So IOW, you'd prefer the IDF deliberately targeting Palestinian civilians w/ crude weaponry... shira Feb 2012 #17
One might conclude from that you like the sort of ordinance that kills the most Palest. "bad guys?" leveymg Feb 2012 #18
Targeting civilians with no military purpose is always wrong. shira Feb 2012 #19
Bottle rockets that rarely hit anything can't be said to be targeting anyone. leveymg Feb 2012 #20
Damn big bottle rockets DUIC Feb 2012 #21
Never seen an RPG before? Want to see a real missile, not a bottle rocket? Check out the Jericho 3 leveymg Feb 2012 #27
How many Jericho IIIs were fired into Gaza DUIC Feb 2012 #31
Problem is, only one would obliterate Gaza and central Israel with it leveymg Feb 2012 #32
The problem is your mischaracterization of Qassam Rockets and other weapons as bottle rockets DUIC Feb 2012 #33
That might be your headline, but not mine. leveymg Feb 2012 #34
Redux DUIC Feb 2012 #35
I've seen tree limbs do more damage to a roof, and badly behaved 3rd graders can mess up a classroom leveymg Feb 2012 #36
Ha, go ahead and minimise this, I would like to imagine how long the USA would tolerate King_David Feb 2012 #37
We in the good ole USA didn't tolerate that sort of thing. Crunchy Frog Feb 2012 #39
You are aware that in addition to Qassams, Grad rockets are being launched from Gaza ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2012 #41
Unless used in a massed salvo, also militarily ineffective. Not worth all the hysteria leveymg Feb 2012 #43
Rather than deflecting, why not share your thoughts on the Haaretz article in the OP? n/t shira Feb 2012 #6
IMO Israel's supporters are obsessed with proving how horrid the Palestinians are because azurnoir Feb 2012 #8
You didn't comment on the OP either. You also deflected. shira Feb 2012 #9
yes I did comment on the OP but you do not like the comment azurnoir Feb 2012 #10
No, you didn't comment on it. I'm expecting some reaction to it... shira Feb 2012 #11
The so called "narrative" is played out daily in the West Bank and East Jerusalem azurnoir Feb 2012 #15
So you acknowledge it's happening & that Palestinian hate/incitement to genocide... shira Feb 2012 #16
lots of yak and little milk and you side stepped my question along with false allegations again azurnoir Feb 2012 #22
I get it. You're not disturbed in the least by all that PA/Hamas incitement in the PMW videos... shira Feb 2012 #23
oh no shira I do not expect you top be disturbed by anything Israel does azurnoir Feb 2012 #24
But what are you disturbed by WRT the community center? That it was demolished... shira Feb 2012 #25
EU condemns demolitions in Silwan azurnoir Feb 2012 #26
Is it fair to say yr FAR more disturbed w/demolition in Silwan than the content in PMW videos? shira Feb 2012 #28
I'm disturbed by both azurnoir Feb 2012 #29
You didn't answer the question. Based on your history here, it appears yr FAR more... shira Feb 2012 #30
and you got your answer I;m disturbed by both azurnoir Feb 2012 #44
its called terrorism.... pelsar Feb 2012 #38
Not surprising since Palestinian TV has a childrens show COLGATE4 Feb 2012 #4
 

DUIC

(167 posts)
2. Why would the Palestinians bomb Iran?
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 10:55 AM
Feb 2012

And, when did they stop firing mortars and rockets into Israel? Terror attacks against Israel are nearly a daily occurrence. It may have something to do with the encouragement to commit acts of terror on the TV programs that they watch.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
3. If the Israelis want to respond with bottle rockets and mortars, they're perfectly entitled to their
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 11:08 AM
Feb 2012

own display of military impotence.

 

holdencaufield

(2,927 posts)
7. These "bottle rockets"...
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 11:52 AM
Feb 2012

... Have killed 16 Israelis (civilians and children) and 6 Palestinians (including children) and maimed and wounded hundreds more.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
12. They're flying pipe bombs (literally). Not militarily effective.
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 01:38 PM
Feb 2012

Probably killed more Palestinian militants building them in auto shops, dropping them during transport in the back of old pickup trucks, and trying to set them off than Israeli farmers who might be randomly standing in the wrong place a few miles away when they land (assuming the thing even gets into the air without killing the launching crew).

They're bottle rockets -- a display of how unsymmetrical and disadvantaged the Palestinians really are -- not militarily effective.

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
40. What total and utter nonsense
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 12:33 AM
Feb 2012

The basic hand grenade (M67) has 6.5 ounces of explosive fill. It is great for killing everyone in a small bunker or room. It can blow up cars. It has a lethal radius of 5 meters a casualty producing radius of 15 meters and fragments can disperse as far as 230 meters.

The Qassam III (current production) which you call a bottle rocket, carries 22 to 44 pounds/352-704 ounces of explosive in its warhead (depends on source quoted).

They are less than effective due to their lack of guidance systems, poor quality control, and operator ineptitude. However, they are more than 50X the explosive power of a pipe bomb or grenade.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
42. Ok, it's like tossing 4 grenades 4 miles, and about as accurate. Happy now?
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 03:29 AM
Feb 2012

Militarily ineffective, unless thrown into a confined room.

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
45. Yes, they're just little bottle rockets & firecrackers. You keep telling yourself that...
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 06:13 AM
Feb 2012

I doubt you'd be as dismissive and insensitive as you are if you and your closest family and friends were under attack for years, getting used to thousands of these harmless toys...




 

shira

(30,109 posts)
13. But you would presumably be outraged if Israel deliberately targeting Palestinian civilians...
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 01:42 PM
Feb 2012

...with those bottle rockets and mortars. Encouraging other Israelis to hatred and incitement, rewarding terror operations, etc.

But when the Palestinians do it, you're not outraged - correct?

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
14. I'd be reassurred that far fewer of them would be killed if both used the same crude weapons
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 01:52 PM
Feb 2012

In addition, if the walls kept the Israelis out of Gaza and the West Bank, as well as vis-a-versa, I'd be all in favor of them.

I really don't think one form of killing, just because it's a "smart bomb" dropped from an F-16, is really any smarter than the other - and, vis-a-versa.

The only thing that' symmetrical about war is stupidity.

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
17. So IOW, you'd prefer the IDF deliberately targeting Palestinian civilians w/ crude weaponry...
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 03:58 PM
Feb 2012

...that serves no military purpose, rather than use more advanced weaponry that has been proven to minimize Palestinian civilian casualties.

Words fail.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
18. One might conclude from that you like the sort of ordinance that kills the most Palest. "bad guys?"
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 04:10 PM
Feb 2012

More bang for the U.S. Aid Dollar? Would I be wrong?

I'd actually prefer both sides were fighting the next war with sticks and stones, or better not at all.

When Israel's responses to Palestinian bottle rockets are proportionate, I'll agree they're justified. Similarly, when Israel dumps all its nukes into the Dead Sea (well, not literally) then I'll consider Iran's nuclear program to be an aggressive act.

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
19. Targeting civilians with no military purpose is always wrong.
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 04:15 PM
Feb 2012

And yes, I prefer ordinance that helps kill the most bad guys with as few civilian casualties as possible.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
20. Bottle rockets that rarely hit anything can't be said to be targeting anyone.
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 04:20 PM
Feb 2012

They're futility weapons - just displays of impotence. Being such a humanitarian, concerned about civilian casualties, I'm surprised you don't like them. Would you prefer that they use Israeli arms - you, know the "ethical", "humanitarian" munitions used by the IDF?

In such a disproportionate conflict, one should prefer the ordinance that kills the fewest people on both sides.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
27. Never seen an RPG before? Want to see a real missile, not a bottle rocket? Check out the Jericho 3
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 10:01 PM
Feb 2012

Last edited Thu Feb 23, 2012, 11:05 PM - Edit history (1)


(actually, that's the Shavit, a li'l MRBM; the 3-stage Jericho III is a true ICBM, but Israel hasn't allowed a single photo of it to be released in the four years it's been operational - an open society in action)

Wiki: Jericho III
It is estimated that the Jericho III is an ICBM which entered service in 2008. The Jericho III is believed to have a three-stage solid propellant and a payload of 1,000 to 1,300 kg. It is possible for the missile to be equipped with a single 750 kg nuclear warhead or two or three low yield MIRV warheads. It has an estimated launch weight of 30,000 kg and a length of 15.5 m with a width of 1.56 m. It may be similar to an upgraded and re-designed Shavit space launch vehicle, produced by Israel Aerospace Industries. It probably has longer first and second-stage motors. It is estimated that it has a range of 4,800 to 11,500 km [7] (2,982 to 7,180 miles).

According to an official report which was submitted to the American congress in 2004,[7] it may be that with a payload of 1,000 kg the Jericho III gives Israel nuclear strike capabilities within the entire Middle East, Africa, Europe, Asia and almost all parts of North America,


Which brings us to the question, why does Israel need a missile that can drop MIRVed thermonuclear warheads on Washington, DC?
 

DUIC

(167 posts)
31. How many Jericho IIIs were fired into Gaza
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 02:16 PM
Feb 2012

Now compare that to your "bottle rockets" of RPGs and Qassam rockets.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
32. Problem is, only one would obliterate Gaza and central Israel with it
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 02:24 PM
Feb 2012

or DC along with parts of the states of Maryland, Virginia and Delaware.

Not an appropriate use, in any case.

 

DUIC

(167 posts)
33. The problem is your mischaracterization of Qassam Rockets and other weapons as bottle rockets
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 02:29 PM
Feb 2012

Why even suggest that the only tool palestinians have is rocks? Why not downgrade the "rocks" to minute particles are conjoined sand. Doesn't that sound better? I can read the headline now: "Bloodthirsty joos arrest sand throwing Arab peace protesters".

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
34. That might be your headline, but not mine.
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 03:15 PM
Feb 2012

Don't like the term, "Bottle rocket"? Okay, maybe, pictures of missiles will work for you:

Palestinian "missile" forces:



Devastation wrought by Qassam "missile" attack:



Missile-throwing Arab:



 

DUIC

(167 posts)
35. Redux
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 03:22 PM
Feb 2012

Palestinian Missile Forces



Devastation wrought by Qassam Missile Strike





Missile-throwing arab:


leveymg

(36,418 posts)
36. I've seen tree limbs do more damage to a roof, and badly behaved 3rd graders can mess up a classroom
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 03:58 PM
Feb 2012

I hope you don't believe that photo set does anything more that reemphasize my point that the forces and weapons are so disproportionate that it's laughable to call it a war. Except that there are people who get hurt and killed on both sides (well, mostly Palestinians) and that is an avoidable tragedy we should all be working to stop.

King_David

(14,851 posts)
37. Ha, go ahead and minimise this, I would like to imagine how long the USA would tolerate
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 05:23 PM
Feb 2012

this kind of terrorism from say, Mexico, before it flattened Mexico city.

Crunchy Frog

(26,610 posts)
39. We in the good ole USA didn't tolerate that sort of thing.
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 02:32 AM
Feb 2012

It's why the Native Americans were practically obliterated.

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
41. You are aware that in addition to Qassams, Grad rockets are being launched from Gaza
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 12:35 AM
Feb 2012

While your "bottle rockets" meme is total nonsense, how do you justify the Grads/Katyushas, as firecrackers?

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
43. Unless used in a massed salvo, also militarily ineffective. Not worth all the hysteria
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 03:38 AM
Feb 2012

They seem to provoke which is entirely disproportionate to their effect. So is the military response by the IDF also disproportionate - which is the point.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
8. IMO Israel's supporters are obsessed with proving how horrid the Palestinians are because
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 12:20 PM
Feb 2012

they do not love their oppressors, a double standard if ever there was

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
9. You didn't comment on the OP either. You also deflected.
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 01:16 PM
Feb 2012

As to your comment, I'm sure there are many Israelis who would say Palestine's supporters are obsessed with proving how horrible the Israelis are, due to the fact they don't love those who hate Jews and want them all dead.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
10. yes I did comment on the OP but you do not like the comment
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 01:23 PM
Feb 2012

so you predictably proclaim deflection with the also predictable they want to kill all the Jews hyperbole for thrown in for good measure, any PMW vids for us today, I can hardly wait

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
11. No, you didn't comment on it. I'm expecting some reaction to it...
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 01:36 PM
Feb 2012

Do you acknowledge that's happening?

Is it a significant problem in your view?

Do you merely disagree with it, or are you - as a progressive antiracist - offended and disgusted by it?

==========

That kind of hate and incitement to kill Jews existed long before Palestinians were oppressed by Israelis. In fact, before there was a Jewish state at all.

I'm pretty sure you can't acknowledge that either b/c it's a narrative killer and toxic to the cause (revolution).

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
15. The so called "narrative" is played out daily in the West Bank and East Jerusalem
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 02:45 PM
Feb 2012

Last edited Thu Feb 23, 2012, 03:43 PM - Edit history (1)

and no matter how much obsessively collected antiPalestinian propaganda you and and the groups you support obsessively collect you can not get around that; so is the stuff you post supposed to justify Israel's actions or what? It seems strange that you claim to so support a two state solution but yet demonize Palestinians every chance you get, even to the point of claiming that he PA (the body with whom Israel is negotiating) is genocidal

I acknowledge what is happening but what you refuse to acknowledge or even admit is that it does not happen in a vacuum, one can only assume you believe the demolitions Israel carries out in Silwan are justified as you never mention them or is this simply one more attempt at distraction>

In my book both actions are wrong how about yours shira any condemnation for Israel demolishing most recently a community center that catered to Palestinian women and youth ?

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
16. So you acknowledge it's happening & that Palestinian hate/incitement to genocide...
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 03:52 PM
Feb 2012

...is just as bad as occupation/settler policy in the W.Bank and Gaza. The hate and incitement is due to Israeli actions in your opinion.

Well at least that's something, I guess. Pathetic, but something nonetheless.



To answer you, yes I'm for 2 states, but what kind of 2 state solution are you promoting in which that kind of Palestinian hatred and incitement to genocide continues to be promoted, sponsored, encouraged, and rewarded by the PA and Hamas? I'd like a real answer to that one.

I believe all hate incitement needs to be dealt with before any 2 state settlement. And no, it's not demonizing Palestinians by bringing up all that genocidal, antisemitic, neo-nazi style rhetoric. No more than legit criticism against Israel and some of its Arab hating settlers is demonization.

And no, I don't believe PMW style Palestinian hate and incitement is due to Israeli policy, since it existed well before 1948. I think it's pathetic that you place the blame for such genocidal Jew hatred on Jews themselves.

As to my own criticism and condemnation of Israeli policies, I don't have any problem condemning any of their immoral, unjust, or illegal actions. I support real liberals who advocate on behalf of both Israelis and Palestinians and fight against that. It appears that you, OTOH, either fear criticizing Palestinians or you're not at all bothered by what they do (like in the PMW videos).

Can you imagine that PMW crap happening in reverse, with Israelis guilty of all that? And the pro-Israel crowd here refusing to condemn it, nor show any disgust and outrage? Can you imagine them making excuses for it? No, I can't either. Now imagine how you guys look to us when none of that disturbs you.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
22. lots of yak and little milk and you side stepped my question along with false allegations again
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 04:48 PM
Feb 2012

Last edited Thu Feb 23, 2012, 05:31 PM - Edit history (1)

do you criticize Israel's demoltions in Silwan? or is that one of the things you do not think wrong

and this little gem

"Can you imagine that PMW crap happening in reverse, with Israelis guilty of all that? And the pro-Israel crowd here refusing to condemn it, nor show any disgust and outrage? Can you imagine them making excuses for it? No, I can't either. Now imagine how you guys look to us when none of that disturbs you"

I can imagine, your doing it right now aren't you? ever wonder why Palestinians aren't collecting propaganda against Israel in the same obsessive manner? could it be because everyday reality speaks for itself?

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
23. I get it. You're not disturbed in the least by all that PA/Hamas incitement in the PMW videos...
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 06:42 PM
Feb 2012

You can't condemn it. The worst, most disgusting brand of anti-Jew genocidal rhetoric, and words fail you. It's okay, you're not alone as all your progressive anti-racist friends prefer ignoring it too.

As to your question, I don't know enough about the Silwan demolitions to really comment. I see there's a lot of anti-Israel propaganda about it, but I'm having a difficult time finding Israel responding to the allegations. Usually when there's something bad going on like this in other nations, both sides of the issue are represented. It's only fair, and it's the very least we should expect from journalists and NGO's.

One thing I found from jpost is that a tent and small stable were demolished outside the community center...
http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=257700

Are we all supposed to be disturbed about that? Just asking...

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
24. oh no shira I do not expect you top be disturbed by anything Israel does
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 07:42 PM
Feb 2012

as to your little jpost article of course Israel would never ever destroy anything that had value to Palestinians in Silwan or anywhere else else we all know that don't we I mean there are videos to prove otherwise are there?

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
25. But what are you disturbed by WRT the community center? That it was demolished...
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 08:41 PM
Feb 2012

...or that a tent in front of it was demolished?

It appears that stories claiming the community center was demolished are false. It was a tent in front, right?

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
26. EU condemns demolitions in Silwan
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 08:50 PM
Feb 2012

The local missions of the European Union condemned on Friday the demolition of several structures of the Maada Community center in Silwan in occupied East Jerusalem.

"The EU missions in Jerusalem and Ramallah condemn the demolition of several structures of the Maada Community Center in the neighbourhood of Silwan (East Jerusalem)," a statement said.

The center, with its cultural and educational activities for youth and women, plays a vital role in the community of Silwan, one the most sensitive neighbourhoods of East Jerusalem, the statement said.

http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=461312

but JPost claims it was only a tent right I mean after all it was Palestinian what more could we expect, right?
 

shira

(30,109 posts)
28. Is it fair to say yr FAR more disturbed w/demolition in Silwan than the content in PMW videos?
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 10:09 AM
Feb 2012

Simple question. Please answer with a yes or no.

=======

It's not just the JPost claiming it was a tent. Here's a pro-Palestinian source...
http://www.mecaforpeace.org/news/statement-demolition-silwan-madaa-silwan-creative-center

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
30. You didn't answer the question. Based on your history here, it appears yr FAR more...
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 10:34 AM
Feb 2012

Last edited Fri Feb 24, 2012, 11:40 AM - Edit history (1)

...disturbed with demolitions in Silwan or area C than you are with the content in PMW videos. I mean, you blast PMW every time the source is used here and you've never once shown how concerned, disgusted, or disturbed you are with the content. Never. Not even once before that last post.

I asked a simple yes/no question and once again you failed to answer.



azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
44. and you got your answer I;m disturbed by both
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 05:14 AM
Feb 2012

but once again not that's the one you wanted/needed, so once again you'll claim the question was not answered, its ok par for the courser and all

pelsar

(12,283 posts)
38. its called terrorism....
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 05:26 PM
Feb 2012

whether its a really small bullet, a 60mm mortar, a kassam, an anti take missile, sniper fire, military grad rocket or the homemade variety or an ied...

all randomlly fired, almost daily all targeting israelis...their constant presence has caused israel to build radar stations, bomb shelters, anti rocket defenses through out the south and nearing middle Israel.

part of the lack of success is the constant pressure on them "freedom fighters" as the load up their rockets, prepare their mortars and attempt to plant an IED...the IDF has to spend enormous resources watching and attacking.

your excuses, while not surprising, are simply excuses for attempted murder and terrorism....

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
4. Not surprising since Palestinian TV has a childrens show
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 11:16 AM
Feb 2012

which features a Mickey Mouse-type character teaching the little ones to 'kill Jews'.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Palestinian television st...