Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Scurrilous

(38,687 posts)
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 04:45 PM Mar 2012

Netanyahu returns empty-handed from Washington

Last edited Wed Mar 7, 2012, 06:12 PM - Edit history (1)

Israel's right to defend itself is a matter of consensus. But whether Israel is sovereign in its decision on when and how to use its American weapons and entangle its most important friend - that's another question.

<snip>

"The Israeli and U.S. governments agree that Iran's striving for nuclear weapons is dangerous for Israel, the region and the world. Everyone understands what a nuclear bomb might do in the hands of an extremist Muslim regime aspiring to regional hegemony.

U.S. President Barack Obama, who has placed nuclear disarmament at the top of his foreign-policy platform, needs no introductory course on the subject. Everyone remembers Israel's resolute response when suspicions arose that hostile regimes were developing such weapons - Iraq in 1981 and Syria in 2007. No one doubts that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu means it when he says he intends to save Israel from an Iranian nuclear bomb.

No component of this equation changed after the prime minister's visit to Washington. Without knowing whether secret understandings were reached, the visit can only be defined as a failure. Netanyahu sought to lay the groundwork for a military operation against Iran; preferably an American operation, but alternatively an Israeli one. From that perspective, he returns from Washington empty-handed, and his government's policy (which does not necessarily conform to Israeli interests ) is in worse shape than when he left.

The tactical differences between Obama and Netanyahu are obvious, irreconcilable, and in this case, when the goals are shared but the conditions and means are in dispute, tactics lead to strategy. Netanyahu wants an attack now, Obama opposes military action before the presidential elections in eight months, and Obama is the one who decides.

Israel's right to defend itself is a matter of consensus. But whether Israel is sovereign in its decision on when and how to use its American weapons and entangle its most important friend - that's another question."

http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/netanyahu-returns-empty-handed-from-washington-1.416932


Israeli state officials disappointed with Obama meeting

<snip>

Senior officials claim US views Iranian issue in the context of 2012 election year; assert it's now certain Washington will not strike Islamic Republic

"Israeli state officials were disappointed Tuesday with the results of the Netanyahu-Obama meeting at the White House on Monday. "There were no surprises," a senior state official said. "It was clear from recent months that there are differences between ourselves and the Americans. We have different perspectives when it comes to the question of time and red lines."

It was claimed that the Americans view the Iranian issue in the context of the upcoming presidential elections. "It's a bad message for the issue and a good message for the Iranians," a state official said."

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4199220,00.html
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Netanyahu returns empty-h...