Ramzy has an insider's view of things.

He has endorsed the work of Gilad Atzmon, who just recently praised David Duke.

“Gilad Atzmon decided to open Pandora’s Box, and ignite a debate that has been frustratingly dormant for too long. His experiences are most authentic, views are hard-hitting, and, at times, provocative. It must be read and discussed.” Ramzy Baroud, Palestine Chronicle


Here's Atzmon recently praising David Duke:
http://soupyone.wordpress.com/2014/06/15/gilad-atzmon-praises-ex-kkker-david-duke/


Let's see first whether we agree that Baroud's support of Atzmon is odious. Then we can move on to his support of terror...

Shameful of you.

Baroud's words are right there, stop falsely accusing people of anti semitism.

His support of terror, you need a new meme.

They distance themselves from it.

Baroud is not a good man.

Here's Baroud praising the vile Greta Berlin:

Support and praise for Greta Berlin at her very worst....
http://uprootedpalestinians.blogspot.com/2012/10/ramzy-barouds-message-on-facebook-re.html

Endorsing Gilad Atzmon's latest screed...
http://www.gilad.co.uk/the-wandering-who/

The second is the same as your last one...Baroud found his book provocative.

I guess that makes him an anti-semite along with Mearsheimer


You need to try harder.

keep this in mind when you support the actions of the IDF and speak against
B'Tselem...as you have slandered them in the past as well.

lol

snip*Even the New York Times, known for its resolute support of successive Israeli governments, is also urging unity. “If there is ever to be an Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement … the Palestinians must be united,” read its editorial, signed by the editorial board, on June 6.

He is such a supporter of terror, while he speaks against Hamas.

But Hamas and Fatah are also at fault. Their absurd infighting and allowing themselves to serve other parties’ agendas is both inexcusable and unforgivable. To think that both parties will continue to dominate the Palestinian leadership landscape for the coming years is not encouraging.

Palestine is not Hamas and Fatah, and Palestinian disunity didn’t start with both of these parties but has been an integral part of the Palestinian national struggle. The fragmentation of the Palestinian political identity is decades-old. It was perhaps the departure of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) from Lebanon in 1982 that accentuated the split between the Palestinian people’s struggle for freedom and their leadership. It was then that Palestinian elitism truly rose to prominence.

more: True unity would have to go back to the original questions that split Palestinian communities in Palestine and around the world in the first place. It has to contend with important questions concerning Palestinian identity, national aspirations, resistance and the outlook of an entire generation that was born after the signing of the Oslo accords in 1993.

Palestinian unity is not a logistical question, but a major undertaking that requires new faces, new names, new thinking, and dare one says, a new leadership.


Stop smearing a good man and accusing him of supporting terror.

You keep this up and I can link your condemnation of B'Tselem and your
blind support for Bibi and IDF actions.

Palestinians if he was such a supporter of terror as you claim? You make no sense.

Your opinions are based on Bibi and his nonsense..just to keep land that does
not belong to Israel.

land that does not belong to them?

No.

Gee, what a surprise.

He has admitted he supports armed resistance.

Add to that the fact that he refuses to condemn outright terror vs. Israeli citizens.

And you have nothing but denial.

One can only hope based on the breath of your posts and sources that they'll
reconsider your false accusations.

We're done here.