Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Scurrilous

(38,687 posts)
Fri Mar 16, 2012, 08:56 PM Mar 2012

Netanyahu's Real Goal is Not Bombing Iran; It's Defeating Obama

<snip>

"The sage Israeli commentator and activist Uri Avnery recently published an excellent analysis of the Israel/Iran situation on The Planetary Movement (1). Mr. Avnery presents the full list of strategic reasons why it is highly unlikely that Netanyahu will launch such an attack. It would result in: the immediate closing of the Strait of Hormuz and thus cut off the flow of about 40% of the world's oil; an immediate all-out Iranian missile assault on the Israeli cities with some missiles getting through and wreaking much destruction no matter how good the Israel/US "missile shield" is; unknown to most US citizens (including an unknown number of their political leaders, especially on the Right) anyway, Iran is very large country, "larger than Germany, France, Spain and Italy combined," Mr. Avnery tells us; it would be a long war, something on the scale of the Vietnam War. Further, very importantly (and the Israelis know this), given the very powerful Israeli nuclear force, what difference would it really make it world politics if Iran does get The Bomb (think India/Pakistan)."

<snip>

"Rather, it appears that Netanyahu's primary goal in trumpeting the "Iran/bomb-let's-bomb" option is to use it to try to secure a GOP victory in the US in November. Thus the painting of Obama as a wimp and blaggard (a scoundrel; an unprincipled, contemptible person; an untrustworthy person) on the matter, dspite the fact that his postion in reality varies little from the published Isreali one: "we [the U.S.] will not let Iran get the bomb" (whether they want it or not). Certainly, the AIPAC/GOP axis treats Obama that way. And why would Netanyahu want to do that, other than (apparently) really not liking Obama personally? Because his goals of aggression have nothing to do with Iran and everything to do with the Palestinians and the Occupied Territories, known to the Israeli Right, their US far right-wing/Orthodox settler base in them, and their US Right-wing Christian supporters. They all make policy based on Biblical text, which does, from several millennia ago, describe "The Land of Israel." What Netanyahu and his even-further-to-the-right allies very possibly really want to do is annex the West Bank and drive out the Palestinians. And then they might ethnically cleanse Israel of its Arab citizens at the same time (because the Arab birthrate exceeds the Jewish birthrate and might eventually create a majority of the electorate). If Obama wins re-election, it is highly unlikely that any of this would be possible, and in one way or another Netanyahu would be forced into real negotiations. This is something he absolutely does not want to do (3). And so, the solution? Get a Republican government elected, by feeding strongly into the standard GOP myth that Obama (?Muslim, ?Kenyan, definitely "black" [even though he is half white]) is "weak." Iran would not be bombed anyway. Israel would certainly not have to negotiate with the Palestinians and might very well be allowed to proceed with its own "resolution" of the "Palestinian problem," which many Israeli government officials have openly advocated (4)."

http://blog.buzzflash.com/node/13384

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Netanyahu's Real Goal is Not Bombing Iran; It's Defeating Obama (Original Post) Scurrilous Mar 2012 OP
The Bush administration had a blind eye, deaf ear and was unable to speak up Thinkingabout Mar 2012 #1
Yet, for all their tone deafness and paralysis, it didn't happen then, because we weren't ready leveymg Mar 2012 #2
something that occurred to me a while back azurnoir Mar 2012 #3
What an idiotic article oberliner Mar 2012 #4
I doubt that he's particularly interested in Obama LeftishBrit Mar 2012 #5

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
1. The Bush administration had a blind eye, deaf ear and was unable to speak up
Fri Mar 16, 2012, 09:11 PM
Mar 2012

When Isreal wanted to bomb their neighbors it was ok and the US oked their agression.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
2. Yet, for all their tone deafness and paralysis, it didn't happen then, because we weren't ready
Fri Mar 16, 2012, 09:37 PM
Mar 2012

and in any position to exploit it. Now, we're largely out of harm's way in Iraq, and have beefed up our forces in Afghanistan.

Objectively, on a purely military level within what is likely to become a regional theater of operations, it's much more likely to be allowed to happen.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
3. something that occurred to me a while back
Sat Mar 17, 2012, 12:51 PM
Mar 2012

that the more hawkish 'Pro-Israel' group(s) would certainly not want to see Obama re-elected because in second and by US law, last term he might not be as constrained by political considerations as he was during his first term when dealing with Israel. As of right now we have 7 1/2 to 8 months between us the US election. Netanyahu is ratcheting up fear and with it support for a preemptive strike on Iran in both his country and as much as possible ours, while the rest of world watches as a captive audience, knowing they too will not escape the economic fallout (at the very least) of such madness.

LeftishBrit

(41,205 posts)
5. I doubt that he's particularly interested in Obama
Sat Mar 17, 2012, 07:01 PM
Mar 2012

What I think he wants, like most politicians, is to stay in power and keep his fragile coalition together. And to do so with as little danger to the Israeli status quo as possible. I doubt that he really wants to bomb Iran. Sabre-rattling is a common Middle Eastern foreign policy strategy, and both the Israeli and Iranian leadership have been engaging in it for years. Of course, every now and then sabre rattling can escalate into something worse. I doubt that it will in the near future, however.

The author of the article is IMO falling into the trap of viewing other countries and leaders mainly through the lens of American politics.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Netanyahu's Real Goal is ...