Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
Fri Jun 27, 2014, 10:16 PM Jun 2014

The bigoted rants of Shmuley Boteach, 'America’s rabbi'

http://972mag.com/the-bigoted-rants-of-shmuley-boteach-americas-rabbi/92591/

If any gentile in America wrote about Jews the way he just wrote about Presbyterians – for any reason – he or she would be ostracized from public life for good.

So many pro-Israel Jews are coming down on the Presbyterians as anti-Semites because of their divestment vote, which is a slander. But why aren’t any of them calling out Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, “America’s rabbi,” for the bigotry he has been spewing? From his Jerusalem Post column a few days ago: (see quote)

If any gentile in America said that about any stream of Judaism for any reason, he or she would be ostracized from public life for good. But “America’s rabbi” gets away with it.

News flash: Jews aren’t weak anymore, they aren’t oppressed, not in Israel nor in America, and in Israel they are the oppressors, so Jews who defend that oppression with hate speech, like “America’s rabbi,” are entitled to no immunity whatsoever.
56 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The bigoted rants of Shmuley Boteach, 'America’s rabbi' (Original Post) R. Daneel Olivaw Jun 2014 OP
The rotting corpse..how tempered of him. Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #1
Well the Presbyterians on that Facebook postings and the BDS crowds King_David Jun 2014 #2
Derfner defended Greta Berlin at her worst. But there's more... shira Jun 2014 #13
You forgot your applause emoticon. n/t Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #18
If Derfner and 972 think the rabbi has said something wrong aranthus Jun 2014 #3
so you agree with the response to the divestment from 3 American companies from an American church? azurnoir Jun 2014 #4
I think that he criticized a political action aranthus Jun 2014 #27
He criticized an entire denomination, and PCUSA did not write Zionism Unsettled azurnoir Jun 2014 #28
Sigh Shaktimaan Jun 2014 #31
and once again sigh Boteach from his JPost article azurnoir Jun 2014 #34
Really? Shaktimaan Jun 2014 #35
Nobody is misunderstanding it. You, although seem to be trying to misinterpret your way out of it. R. Daneel Olivaw Jun 2014 #42
Seriously .... Israeli Jun 2014 #5
Thanks for the info, Israeli. Nice to see you again. R. Daneel Olivaw Jun 2014 #17
Very informative, thank you. n/t Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #19
I thought you weren't interested in American Jews King_David Jun 2014 #20
Thanks quite informative azurnoir Jun 2014 #29
Nope I think you missed it all King_David Jun 2014 #38
ah ya sure whatever you say azurnoir Jun 2014 #56
his name is well known over here azurnoir.... Israeli Jun 2014 #44
Shmuley is a shmuck. xfundy Jun 2014 #6
Wow Shaktimaan Jun 2014 #7
apparently you didn't read his JPost column or assume that perhaps....... azurnoir Jun 2014 #8
I read it Shaktimaan Jun 2014 #10
Derfner quoted the article correctly azurnoir Jun 2014 #11
No more bigoted than criticism against the Roman Catholic Church.... shira Jun 2014 #14
so in your mind divesting from 3 American companies is comparable to child sexual predation? azurnoir Jun 2014 #22
No, Boteach's criticism of PCUSA is no more bigoted than criticism of the RCC. shira Jun 2014 #23
Botechs words were very bigoted and he made no distinctions - let's review them again azurnoir Jun 2014 #24
He condemned the Presb. Church, and it's just like condemning the RCC. n/t shira Jun 2014 #25
That's not what you said before in your last comment let's review azurnoir Jun 2014 #26
Substitute RCC and Catholics for PCUSA and Presbyterians. It's not bigoted. n/t shira Jun 2014 #30
But that's not what Boteach did he was very plain in who he condemned I'll repeat it for you again azurnoir Jun 2014 #51
The quotes are right Shaktimaan Jun 2014 #32
Shak, check out this latest article from Mondoweiss. It's long.... shira Jun 2014 #15
The author of the OP, Derfner, called on the ADL to suspend its work..... shira Jun 2014 #9
who exactly sabbat hunter Jun 2014 #12
Neither have I. n/t Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #16
I seen some articles by him before King_David Jun 2014 #21
So Shaktimaan Jun 2014 #33
Well, shak, I bolded the first part because the first part was bolded in the articel. R. Daneel Olivaw Jun 2014 #39
Post removed Post removed Jun 2014 #40
Oh please alert if you believe the post R. Daneel Olivaw Jun 2014 #41
Who agrees w/ Derfner about Jews in Israel as the oppressors? Isn't that a bigoted statement? n/t shira Jun 2014 #36
Spin that top as fast as you can, shira, and see where it flies off to. R. Daneel Olivaw Jun 2014 #43
LOL. Derfner explicitly wrote that in Israel Jews are the oppressors. shira Jun 2014 #45
Well, King Dave is always writing how the Jews were weak but "Now we're strong" so I guess that he R. Daneel Olivaw Jun 2014 #46
So the Jews are the oppressors in the conflict. Quite a bigoted statement.... shira Jun 2014 #47
Well, shira. Israel is the opressor and not the Palestinians. R. Daneel Olivaw Jun 2014 #48
Israel, not the Jews - yes? And Palestinian leaders are oppressive - right? shira Jun 2014 #49
"Israel, not the Jews - yes?" R. Daneel Olivaw Jun 2014 #50
Of course it's all about the Jews King_David Jun 2014 #52
I'm always being told here the problem is with the gov't, not Jews.... shira Jun 2014 #53
Well read his reply, King_David Jun 2014 #54
How many times have we been told Israel is not synonymous w/ Jews? shira Jun 2014 #55
He's not a fan of Obama, but he certainly is a supporter for the settlements: Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #37

King_David

(14,851 posts)
2. Well the Presbyterians on that Facebook postings and the BDS crowds
Fri Jun 27, 2014, 11:25 PM
Jun 2014

Are anti Jewish haters bigoted POS ... So good for the Rabbi ... Fuck em!

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
13. Derfner defended Greta Berlin at her worst. But there's more...
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 08:48 AM
Jun 2014

Last edited Sat Jun 28, 2014, 10:56 AM - Edit history (2)

In the comments section at +972 for this OP (Scootaloo made a comment there) Derfner claims there's not a shred of antisemitism in Ali Abunimah and Philip Weiss (mondoweiss).

Funny thing is 3 days ago Mondoweiss published the following about Jeffrey Goldberg using David Duke to condemn the PCUSA:
http://mondoweiss.net/2014/06/goldberg-presbyterian-divestment.html

It's a long article that I recommend you read.

I can't see it as anything other than an apologetic article for David Duke masquerading as an argument against a logical fallacy. See for yourself and lemme know what you think.

Mondoweiss is making a comeback in some OP's here, BTW.

aranthus

(3,385 posts)
3. If Derfner and 972 think the rabbi has said something wrong
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 01:46 AM
Jun 2014

it's an almost sure bet that he's said something true.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
4. so you agree with the response to the divestment from 3 American companies from an American church?
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 01:53 AM
Jun 2014

there is far more hate in the response to the actions than in the actions themselves of PCUSA

aranthus

(3,385 posts)
27. I think that he criticized a political action
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 02:20 PM
Jun 2014

led by the bigots who created "Zionism Unsettled." There is hatred of the bigotry of the action in the Rabbi's writing, which there should be. That isn't the same as hatred of the Church.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
28. He criticized an entire denomination, and PCUSA did not write Zionism Unsettled
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 02:24 PM
Jun 2014

geez let's take a look a Boteach's words in Jpost again

The rotting corpse of the Presbyterian Church got another nail in its coffin with the vote on Friday at its general convention to divest from companies doing business with Israel. It’s bad enough that the Church is hemorrhaging members faster than Donald Sterling is hemorrhaging Los Angeles Clippers fans. Now the Church demonstrates that it has no moral compass and suffers from a healthy does of “underdogma” whereby right and wrong are determined not by biblical mandate or moral teaching but by whomever is the weaker party.

The Presbyterians supposedly believe in the Bible. I say supposedly because I’m confused by their general approach to morality, which seems to follow a show of hands every year at their general conference.

http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/No-holds-barred-By-condemning-Israel-Presbyterians-are-condemning-themselves-360328



azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
34. and once again sigh Boteach from his JPost article
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 04:00 PM
Jun 2014

The rotting corpse of the Presbyterian Church got another nail in its coffin with the vote on Friday at its general convention to divest from companies doing business with Israel. It’s bad enough that the Church is hemorrhaging members faster than Donald Sterling is hemorrhaging Los Angeles Clippers fans. Now the Church demonstrates that it has no moral compass and suffers from a healthy does of “underdogma” whereby right and wrong are determined not by biblical mandate or moral teaching but by whomever is the weaker party.

The Presbyterians supposedly believe in the Bible. I say supposedly because I’m confused by their general approach to morality, which seems to follow a show of hands every year at their general conference.

http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/No-holds-barred-By-condemning-Israel-Presbyterians-are-condemning-themselves-360328

sounds like the entire denomination to me

Shaktimaan

(5,397 posts)
35. Really?
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 04:45 PM
Jun 2014

Then you're misunderstanding it.

If he was discussing the whole denomination then why did he keep saying "the church" or "the Presbyterian church" over and over again? In fact, the only time he said simply "the Presbyterians" it was in reference to an aggressive, but fair and in no way bigoted, criticism regarding their methodology for deciding ethical questions.

As opposed to the op author, who spoke critically of "the Jews" in a monolithic sense.

If this article made these same accusations of lax morals, but the target was a right wing pro settler synagogue in the West Bank, would you consider these same statements anti-Semitic?

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
42. Nobody is misunderstanding it. You, although seem to be trying to misinterpret your way out of it.
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 12:39 AM
Jun 2014
http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/No-holds-barred-By-condemning-Israel-Presbyterians-are-condemning-themselves-360328

The rotting corpse of the Presbyterian Church got another nail in its coffin with the vote on Friday at its general convention to divest from companies doing business with Israel. It’s bad enough that the Church is hemorrhaging members faster than Donald Sterling is hemorrhaging Los Angeles Clippers fans. Now the Church demonstrates that it has no moral compass and suffers from a healthy does of “underdogma” whereby right and wrong are determined not by biblical mandate or moral teaching but by whomever is the weaker party.


The "Church" is synonymous with the entirety of that faith. The Catholic "Church", the Lutheran "Church", and in this instance the Presbyterian "Church."

Now if the real bigot went after a particular parish then you might have a leg to stand on, a pulpit to preach from and a laity to lay it on, but since that's not the case it's three strikes and a out for you.



Israeli

(4,148 posts)
5. Seriously ....
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 02:33 AM
Jun 2014

Is anyone suprised ?
Classic comment from a religious Right winger .... he is pandering to his friends running our country :

Billionaire casino mogul Sheldon Adelson, among the top donors to the Republican machine this election, is also now the top giver – along with his wife – to the New Jersey congressional race of the reality-TV rabbi, Shmuley Boteach.

Mr. Adelson, who runs the Las Vegas Sands international gaming empire, and his wife, Dr. Miriam Adelson, who runs the Adelson drug clinic, have each given $250,000, or $500,000 total, to a new independent super PAC called the Patriot Prosperity PAC, according to people close to the Adelsons and the PAC.

Patriot Prosperity is supporting Mr. Boteach, who is running as a Republican, against eight-term Democratic Rep. Bill Pascrell, Jr. in a newly redrawn district in northern New Jersey.

Rabbi Shmuley, as his website calls him, is well-known in the New York-New Jersey area as the author of the book “Kosher Sex;” the host of the TV show “Shalom in the Home;” and a spiritual adviser to the late pop star Michael Jackson. Newsweek has named him one of the 50 most influential rabbis in the U.S.

“I treasure the Adelsons’ support. They are among the most generous and sophisticated political donors in the country,” said Mr. Boteach in a statement through his spokesman. The Adelsons previously have given directly to Mr. Boteach’s campaign. The $500,000 donation to the new super PAC “is a game-changer, and I suspect there will be many more like it,” said Mr. Boteach.

Mr. Boteach and Mr. Adelson, who are friends, are both acquaintances with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, according to people who know Mr. Boteach and Mr. Adelson. On New Jersey primary day in June, Mr. Boteach was in Israel for his sister in law’s wedding – where he had a private meeting with Mr. Netanyahu, according to an article Mr. Boteach wrote for Huffington Post.

Mr. Adelson, who owns a conservative newspaper in Israel, encouraged Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney to go to Israel last month, where Mr. Romney met with Mr. Netanyahu.

The Adelsons have recently given $10 million to the super PAC Restore Our Future, which supports Mr. Romney. Mr. Adelson has told friends he will give $100 million to conservative causes and candidates this election and to defeat President Barack Obama.


Michael Glassner, who is the executive director of the Patriot Prosperity PAC, worked for Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole (R., Kan.) in the 1990s and for John McCain’s 2008 race. He confirmed the Adelsons’ donations.

Mr. Pascrell just won his own primary against another eight-term Democrat, his friend Rep. Steve Rothman of Hackensack, in June.


Source:
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/08/20/rabbi-shmuley-gets-boost-from-adelsons/

King_David

(14,851 posts)
20. I thought you weren't interested in American Jews
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 12:06 PM
Jun 2014

Politicking , because they have a "different culture " from you ? Or at least that's what you told Pelser .

Israeli

(4,148 posts)
44. his name is well known over here azurnoir....
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 02:50 AM
Jun 2014

....there was a court case back in 2006 , everything about the case is in Hebrew but I found this :

http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/failed_messiahcom/2010/08/rabbi-shmuley-boteach-family-linked-to-illegal-arms-dealing-and-money-laundering-678.html

In March 2006, the State of Israel accused Botach's brother and business partner in L.A., Shlomo Botach, of "using professional money launderers" to transfer $860,000 from the U.S. through Swiss and Uruguayan banks to an account in Israel, code-named "Ezra 26." The court case covered transfers totaling $331,000.

In court documents translated from Hebrew for the Weekly, Shlomo stated he was moving the money to Israel so that Judith Boteach couldn't access it during the palimony dispute.

But the State of Israel alleged that the money was wired in small batches so that it could be slipped past authorities.

Though the documents show that Shlomo claimed he was acting on Botach's behalf, Botach is not accused of any wrongdoing.


Not everyone is buying brother Shlomo Botach's explanation for why he was moving money to Israel. In 2006, Jaffa District Court Judge Kobi Vardi in Tel Aviv called his stated reason — that he was keeping it out of Boteach's hands — an "unacceptable fabrication."

Vardi said Shlomo Botach was part of a "sophisticated and well-lubricated organization" that intended to launder money.

Shlomo argued, "They didn't intend to hire shady characters for the purpose of transferring funds to Israel ... as it is 'clean,' legitimate money derived from their business in the USA." But in May 2006, the Israeli judge ordered that half of the cash be confiscated.

The Botach family soon took another blow: Diveroli emerged as the owner of an arms firm, AEY Inc., in Miami Beach, which appeared on a U.S. Department of State watch list for contract fraud and violation of the Arms Export Control Act.

Despite this, the tiny firm was awarded the $300 million U.S. Army defense contract that made it the main supplier of ammo to the Afghan government.


He is as Right wing as it gets ... which explains Larry Derfner's reaction to his comments .



xfundy

(5,105 posts)
6. Shmuley is a shmuck.
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 03:47 AM
Jun 2014

I look forward to the days when religions and those who profit from them get sent to an island to fight it out once and for all, and leave the rest of us the fuck alone.

Shaktimaan

(5,397 posts)
7. Wow
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 04:49 AM
Jun 2014

This author doesn't seem to realize that rabbi shmuley didn't write anything about Presbeterians at all, much less anything bigoted. He criticized the Presbeterian Church for a specific political act that he feels is representative of a failure of morality. Which one can agree or disagree with. Calling it hate speech though, is nonsensical. Notice how the author had to distort and misrepresent shmuley's words to make this accusation at all.

News flash: Jews aren’t weak anymore, they aren’t oppressed, not in Israel nor in America, and in Israel they are the oppressors, so Jews who defend that oppression with hate speech, like “America’s rabbi,” are entitled to no immunity whatsoever.


What does anything shmuley wrote have to do with Jews being oppressed? This author seems to think that shmuley is only "getting away" with "hate speech" because he's Jewish... Jews having "immunity" from criticism that any other group would have been subject to.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
8. apparently you didn't read his JPost column or assume that perhaps.......
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 05:35 AM
Jun 2014

but here it is

The rotting corpse of the Presbyterian Church got another nail in its coffin with the vote on Friday at its general convention to divest from companies doing business with Israel. It’s bad enough that the Church is hemorrhaging members faster than Donald Sterling is hemorrhaging Los Angeles Clippers fans. Now the Church demonstrates that it has no moral compass and suffers from a healthy does of “underdogma” whereby right and wrong are determined not by biblical mandate or moral teaching but by whomever is the weaker party.

The Presbyterians supposedly believe in the Bible. I say supposedly because I’m confused by their general approach to morality, which seems to follow a show of hands every year at their general conference.

http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/No-holds-barred-By-condemning-Israel-Presbyterians-are-condemning-themselves-360328

Shaktimaan

(5,397 posts)
10. I read it
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 06:08 AM
Jun 2014

Hence my statement. Everything you posted seems to support my conclusion and nullify the op's.

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
14. No more bigoted than criticism against the Roman Catholic Church....
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 09:08 AM
Jun 2014

...for its scandalous cover-ups.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
22. so in your mind divesting from 3 American companies is comparable to child sexual predation?
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 01:46 PM
Jun 2014

well okay then certainly I can add no more

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
23. No, Boteach's criticism of PCUSA is no more bigoted than criticism of the RCC.
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 01:50 PM
Jun 2014

Condemning the RCC for its scandalous behavior was not an attack on all Catholics, like Derfner is making this out to be against all Presbyterians.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
24. Botechs words were very bigoted and he made no distinctions - let's review them again
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 02:02 PM
Jun 2014

The rotting corpse of the Presbyterian Church got another nail in its coffin with the vote on Friday at its general convention to divest from companies doing business with Israel. It’s bad enough that the Church is hemorrhaging members faster than Donald Sterling is hemorrhaging Los Angeles Clippers fans. Now the Church demonstrates that it has no moral compass and suffers from a healthy does of “underdogma” whereby right and wrong are determined not by biblical mandate or moral teaching but by whomever is the weaker party.

The Presbyterians supposedly believe in the Bible. I say supposedly because I’m confused by their general approach to morality, which seems to follow a show of hands every year at their general conference.

http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/No-holds-barred-By-condemning-Israel-Presbyterians-are-condemning-themselves-360328

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
26. That's not what you said before in your last comment let's review
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 02:19 PM
Jun 2014

Condemning the RCC for its scandalous behavior was not an attack on all Catholics, like Derfner is making this out to be against all Presbyterians.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1134&pid=65536

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
51. But that's not what Boteach did he was very plain in who he condemned I'll repeat it for you again
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 04:34 PM
Jun 2014

maybe this time you'll understand

The rotting corpse of the Presbyterian Church got another nail in its coffin with the vote on Friday at its general convention to divest from companies doing business with Israel. It’s bad enough that the Church is hemorrhaging members faster than Donald Sterling is hemorrhaging Los Angeles Clippers fans. Now the Church demonstrates that it has no moral compass and suffers from a healthy does of “underdogma” whereby right and wrong are determined not by biblical mandate or moral teaching but by whomever is the weaker party.

The Presbyterians supposedly believe in the Bible. I say supposedly because I’m confused by their general approach to morality, which seems to follow a show of hands every year at their general conference


http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/No-holds-barred-By-condemning-Israel-Presbyterians-are-condemning-themselves-360328


Shaktimaan

(5,397 posts)
32. The quotes are right
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 03:23 PM
Jun 2014

But then his statements about, summaries of and conclusions drawn are all either untrue, misleading or extremely bigoted themselves.


Shmuley gets a pass cuz he's a Jew! (Who play victim to more easily oppress others!). else would've been lambasted!!!!

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
15. Shak, check out this latest article from Mondoweiss. It's long....
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 09:30 AM
Jun 2014
http://mondoweiss.net/2014/06/goldberg-presbyterian-divestment.html

Is it just me or is Mondoweiss now trying to sanitize and whitewash David Duke?

I ask b/c I know you did some hard time over there.
 

shira

(30,109 posts)
9. The author of the OP, Derfner, called on the ADL to suspend its work.....
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 06:04 AM
Jun 2014

....fighting antisemitism in order to focus on Israeli infractions instead:

The ADL (Anti-Defamation League) goes after anti-Semitism with a fist, it goes after Israeli racism with a sigh. As a matter of fact, the ADL and the entire American Jewish establishment should suspend their campaigns against anti-Semitism indefinitely and take a look at what’s going on in Israel. http://forward.com/articles/182171/israels-everyday-racism-and-how-american-jews-tu/#ixzz2xdzNqUEV


PCUSA cherry-picked this quote for one of their resolutions (04-09) they passed; "Resolution on Equal Rights for All Inhabitants of Israel and Palestine and on Conversations with Prophetic Voices."

Seems Larry is trying to do some damage control here for the PCUSA passing a resolution (using Derfner's work) calling Israelis racist.

sabbat hunter

(6,829 posts)
12. who exactly
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 08:05 AM
Jun 2014

named him "america's rabbi" I have never even heard of the guy until this post. IT seems like the title of 'America's rabbi' is self-proclaimed at best.



King_David

(14,851 posts)
21. I seen some articles by him before
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 12:20 PM
Jun 2014

But never knew he was as important as Derfner is making him out to be.

Shaktimaan

(5,397 posts)
33. So
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 03:57 PM
Jun 2014

Did you bold the parts to show us where this author's own bigotry becomes apparent or did you just bold the parts you most agreed with?

There are plenty of examples of hateful prejudice in this post. Interestingly, none of them exist within shmuley's quoted statements but before and after them, authored by this journalist himself.

I have a question. We're you aware that those parts you bolded were even bigoted before you so publicly supported them? Or are they just statements you agree with, which you never would have considered prejudicial had it not been pointed out to you?

Assuming this came as a surprise, do you see what makes these posts so bigoted now that it's been pointed out to you? Do you still support these ideas now, even knowing that they're hateful, anti-Semitic and untrue?

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
39. Well, shak, I bolded the first part because the first part was bolded in the articel.
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 08:10 PM
Jun 2014

The second part I bolded for emphasis since Derfner seemed to make a good point.


For the rest of your asks and accusations I can send you a box of tissue if that will help you feel better: COD of course.

Response to R. Daneel Olivaw (Reply #39)

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
41. Oh please alert if you believe the post
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 10:10 PM
Jun 2014

Last edited Sun Jun 29, 2014, 12:16 AM - Edit history (1)

to be bigoted.

Thank you for the theater, though. Your performance above is almost believable.



On edit: I didn't alert on your post since I would rather have the DU readership see you, and your accusations for what they truly are: unfounded and fabricated.

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
43. Spin that top as fast as you can, shira, and see where it flies off to.
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 12:57 AM
Jun 2014

Derfner is criticizing the "bigoted Rabbi" and "So many pro-Israel Jews are coming down on the Presbyterians as anti-Semites because of their divestment vote, which is a slander" FWIW.

Let's dissect that statement that has your feathers all ruffled.

News flash: Jews aren’t weak anymore, they aren’t oppressed, not in Israel nor in America, and in Israel they are the oppressors, so Jews who defend that oppression with hate speech, like “America’s rabbi,” are entitled to no immunity whatsoever.


It's a call out that bigots who target others with dubious claims of anti-Semitism are fair game themselves.
Rabbi Shmuley Boteach apparently is in the same bigoted muck that David Duke is.
 

shira

(30,109 posts)
45. LOL. Derfner explicitly wrote that in Israel Jews are the oppressors.
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 07:08 AM
Jun 2014

Was he wrong to write:

Jews aren’t weak anymore, they aren’t oppressed, not in Israel nor in America, and in Israel they are the oppressors,


Also, do you agree with Derfner about the ADL:

The ADL (Anti-Defamation League) goes after anti-Semitism with a fist, it goes after Israeli racism with a sigh. As a matter of fact, the ADL and the entire American Jewish establishment should suspend their campaigns against anti-Semitism indefinitely and take a look at what’s going on in Israel. http://forward.com/articles/182171/israels-everyday-racism-and-how-american-jews-tu/#ixzz2xdzNqUEV


Maybe the NAACP should suspend their campaigns against racism indefinitely to take a look at what's happening in __________.

Do you agree with Derfner? Yes or No?
 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
46. Well, King Dave is always writing how the Jews were weak but "Now we're strong" so I guess that he
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 08:28 AM
Jun 2014

believes part of it.

"and in Israel they are the oppressors"


Well, the Palestinians aren't bulldozing homes to put up "Palestinian only" settlements both inside and outside their borders. They don't burn or chop down Israeli olive groves. The don't lock up Israelis indefinitely without trial. The don't limit Israeli rights to religious freedom.

So yes, the author has a point that apparently is missed by some.

Maybe the NAACP should suspend their campaigns against racism indefinitely to take a look at what's happening in __________.


Well, shira the NAACP is not turning a blind eye while African Americans terrorize a certain population under their colonial control, so that is a horrible comparison on your part.


Derfner makes a good point that is hard to swallow for some. The same argument could be made about whites in the Jim Crow South USA or apartheid South Africa.


...but please spin away now.
 

shira

(30,109 posts)
47. So the Jews are the oppressors in the conflict. Quite a bigoted statement....
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 09:21 AM
Jun 2014

...by Derfner. There's no getting around that one.

The NAACP is an American organization that shouldn't be pressured into stopping all their anti-racist work in order to focus on another conflict across the globe (to their critics' satisfaction). That sounds like something David Duke and his followers would take the NAACP to task on.

There's no getting around that one either.

Consider that Derfner defended Greta Berlin at her worst and it's clear that Derfner isn't the go-to guy for all that's bigoted or racist.

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
49. Israel, not the Jews - yes? And Palestinian leaders are oppressive - right?
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 03:21 PM
Jun 2014

Last edited Sun Jun 29, 2014, 03:53 PM - Edit history (1)

Not that I expect you to answer me, but I'll answer you:

Israel is definitely oppressive to Palestinians, whether it's towards terrorists or the most peaceful of Palestinians. War is hell. It's unfortunate the conflict persists.

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
50. "Israel, not the Jews - yes?"
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 04:24 PM
Jun 2014

Who in Israel is doing the oppressing, shira?

Who in Israel is colonizing the West Bank, shira?

Who in Israel is creating an apartheid state in the West Bank, shira?


Hint: It's not the Pope.

King_David

(14,851 posts)
52. Of course it's all about the Jews
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 04:38 PM
Jun 2014

He said as much in his reply.
Why do you think David Dike is involved in this conflict ? Jews

King_David

(14,851 posts)
54. Well read his reply,
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 04:49 PM
Jun 2014

Jews is the reason everybody is involved in this forum except for the Palestinian posters.
But it is the major motivation of just about everybody posting here in IP on both sides of the conflict .

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
55. How many times have we been told Israel is not synonymous w/ Jews?
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 05:10 PM
Jun 2014

If we had a dime for every.....

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»The bigoted rants of Shmu...