Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Israel/Palestine
Related: About this forumHaaretz editorial: Lapid must stand up for peace
Lapid must stand up for peace
Now is the time to form a peace-seeking government made up of parties that are able to lead Israel according to the Bar-Ilan framework.
Haaretz Editorial
Jul. 10, 2014
Opposition chairman MK Isaac Herzog (Labor) was asked what he would do if he were prime minister. I would do everything that is necessary to prevent the intolerable rocket fire on southern Israel, he answered, and I would go Ramallah to advance an agreement with the Palestinians. Herzog combined finding a tactical solution to this acute problem with a strategy for preventing future conflicts.
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas told Akiva Eldar during an interview for the Israel Conference on Peace that he would uphold his promise to hold another nine months of negotiations if Israel lives up to its previous commitment to release the fourth round of prisoners. Abbas also stated that a Palestinian commitment to talks would hinge on an Israeli commitment to discuss borders during the first three months of the talks, as well as refrain from building new settlements.
Finance Minister Yair Lapid said during the Herzliya Conference last month that Israel must define its borders, stop settlement construction outside of the large blocs, and renew talks with the Palestinian Authority. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rejected Lapids suggestions, calling him inexperienced. How can Israel give the Palestinians borders without receiving anything in exchange, Netanyahu asked. But Lapid was right, and Netanyahu was wrong, or perhaps he preferred to halt any progress. An agreement, if and when it is signed, would include many issues; it will be impossible to implement a proposal or accord based on a single issue. It must be part of an overarching agreement. Its hard to believe that the Israeli government and the Palestinian Authority engaged in negotiations for nine months but didnt talk about borders. Abbas demand that this be the first issue discussed in a new round of talks is justified, and according to Lapid, its in Israels interest as well. Abbas and Lapid also both see the Arab Peace Initiative of 2003 as a basis for an agreement between Israel and the Palestinians. The reason there are currently no negotiations is clear: Either the prime minister does not believe the things he said during his Bar-Ilan speech or he is unable to prevail over the extreme right-wing elements in his coalition, thereby making him unfit to lead.
Now is the time to form a government made up of parties that are able to lead Israel according to the Bar-Ilan framework articulated by Netanyahu and the strategy put forth by Lapid and Herzog. Netanyahu could put together a coalition without Habayit Hayehudi and certain MKs from Likud and Yisrael Beiteinu who wish to continue representing the settlers. Lapid must issue an ultimatum to the prime minister:
Either with me on the path to peace, or without me.
Now is the time to form a peace-seeking government made up of parties that are able to lead Israel according to the Bar-Ilan framework.
Haaretz Editorial
Jul. 10, 2014
Opposition chairman MK Isaac Herzog (Labor) was asked what he would do if he were prime minister. I would do everything that is necessary to prevent the intolerable rocket fire on southern Israel, he answered, and I would go Ramallah to advance an agreement with the Palestinians. Herzog combined finding a tactical solution to this acute problem with a strategy for preventing future conflicts.
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas told Akiva Eldar during an interview for the Israel Conference on Peace that he would uphold his promise to hold another nine months of negotiations if Israel lives up to its previous commitment to release the fourth round of prisoners. Abbas also stated that a Palestinian commitment to talks would hinge on an Israeli commitment to discuss borders during the first three months of the talks, as well as refrain from building new settlements.
Finance Minister Yair Lapid said during the Herzliya Conference last month that Israel must define its borders, stop settlement construction outside of the large blocs, and renew talks with the Palestinian Authority. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rejected Lapids suggestions, calling him inexperienced. How can Israel give the Palestinians borders without receiving anything in exchange, Netanyahu asked. But Lapid was right, and Netanyahu was wrong, or perhaps he preferred to halt any progress. An agreement, if and when it is signed, would include many issues; it will be impossible to implement a proposal or accord based on a single issue. It must be part of an overarching agreement. Its hard to believe that the Israeli government and the Palestinian Authority engaged in negotiations for nine months but didnt talk about borders. Abbas demand that this be the first issue discussed in a new round of talks is justified, and according to Lapid, its in Israels interest as well. Abbas and Lapid also both see the Arab Peace Initiative of 2003 as a basis for an agreement between Israel and the Palestinians. The reason there are currently no negotiations is clear: Either the prime minister does not believe the things he said during his Bar-Ilan speech or he is unable to prevail over the extreme right-wing elements in his coalition, thereby making him unfit to lead.
Now is the time to form a government made up of parties that are able to lead Israel according to the Bar-Ilan framework articulated by Netanyahu and the strategy put forth by Lapid and Herzog. Netanyahu could put together a coalition without Habayit Hayehudi and certain MKs from Likud and Yisrael Beiteinu who wish to continue representing the settlers. Lapid must issue an ultimatum to the prime minister:
Either with me on the path to peace, or without me.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 842 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Haaretz editorial: Lapid must stand up for peace (Original Post)
flpoljunkie
Jul 2014
OP
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)1. That would require lapid standing up for something
My understanding is that his function in the Israeli government thus far has been to look handsome when cameras are around.
But then ever since Oberliner vanished (shortly after predicting Livni as PM.. .then predicting Lapid as PM) the internal politics of Israel hasn't gotten a lot of coverage around here, so maybe I'm wrong?
flpoljunkie
(26,184 posts)2. Sounds as if he may well be
Finance Minister Yair Lapid said during the Herzliya Conference last month that Israel must define its borders, stop settlement construction outside of the large blocs, and renew talks with the Palestinian Authority.