Israel/Palestine
Related: About this forumBad policies in east Jerusalem
Last edited Mon Oct 13, 2014, 07:48 PM - Edit history (1)
Earlier this month I was walking down the streets of the Arab neighborhood of Silwan in East Jerusalem, where settlers had entered seven buildings just a few days earlier. The unpaved roads and uncollected garbage were a clear indication that I was standing east of the Green Line. Despite Israels annexation of East Jerusalem in 1967, the Arab neighborhoods there are still plagued by poor infrastructure and general neglect. They are definitely not spots one would consider moving into for quality of life. Due to the entry of the settlers, the streets of Silwan were full of police officers and private security guards, sponsored by Israels Ministry of Housing and Construction.
On the same day, after learning about the final approval of a plan for 2,610 housing units in Givat Hamatos, Peace Now exposed to the Israeli public the plan for the construction at the southern municipal border of Jerusalem.
Peace Nows Settlement Watch Department reports on such developments on a regular basis. It does so in order to stimulate government transparency and a democratic public debate on the issue of settlements. Under Prime Minister Netanyahu, unfortunately, such reports have been rather frequent due to his policy of settlement expansion.
After his meeting with US President Barack Obama, later that evening, Netanyahu slammed Peace Now for reporting on the recent developments, while attempting to divert the criticism on Silwan and Givat Hamatos. Netanyahu even accused the movement of lack of national responsibility, as if Peace Now has any control over settlement plans or their timing. Inside Israel, Netanyahus statement partially succeeded in diverting criticism away from him and toward Peace Now. The usual suspects from the Israeli right joined the attack and even recycled their call for the promotion of the NGO bill, which aims to impose heavy taxes on peace and human rights non-profits.
http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Bad-policies-in-east-Jerusalem-378802
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Ealking?
King_David
(14,851 posts)Thank you.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)What is your take on this article? You seem to have posted several pieces on Silwan with some conflicting opinions. What do you make of it all?
King_David
(14,851 posts)There are so many differing opinions.
This peace now article seems to be taking issue with Netanyahu's idiotic knack of antagonizing Obama more than anything else.
And a little more,
He says : 'accepting the fact that any future solution will require a compromise in Jerusalem.' - these are wise words for all sides.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)The section on Jerusalem is fascinating. They went neighborhood by neighborhood trying to create a map that both sides would accept. He put so much effort into trying to broker a deal - ultimately one of the biggest disappointments of his presidency he says.
King_David
(14,851 posts)And a real shame it went nowhere.