Israel/Palestine
Related: About this forumUnder Abbas, majority say they cannot speak freely
Those who pretend to care about Palestinian human and civil rights just shrug at this.
They don't believe criticism of Hamas or the PA is justified given that these organizations (not just Palestinian civilians) are oppressed. If Hamas and the PA decide to treat their people like shit, the anti-Zionist BDS'ers won't condemn them b/c condemning Hamas and the PA is considered to be in the best interests of the Zionist cause.
Two-thirds of Palestinians say they are afraid to criticize Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, according to a poll, and some recent actions by Abbas only seem to confirm claims that dissent comes at a price.
more...
http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_article.php?id=22203
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)To see someone who has to be told what to think, trying to tell others what they think.
shira
(30,109 posts)....who has to be told what to think, from vile racist organizations like Mondoweiss, Electronic Intifada, BDS, etc.
If I'm wrong about the way anti-Zionist BDS'ers practically never criticize PA/Hamas oppression of their own people, then correct me.
Or fold.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)What's the matter, couldn't find something from islamophobe and accredited asshole, Richard Landes? Run out of conspiracy theories from the inunderestimable Nahum Shahaf?
shira
(30,109 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)See, ad hominem is when you attack someone's character in an attempt to rebut or negate the argument they are making. So like, when you and your friends try to claim RDO is an "antisemite" because he presents you with questions you can't answer, that's ad hominem (it's also a personal attack, which is actually different from ad hominem.)
What I'm doing is simple mockery. It's not an attempt to rebut or argue, because as far as I can tell, there's not anything to rebut or argue. Rather, I am squeezing amusement out of laughing over someone who agrees with whatever her sources tell her on a minute-to-minute basis, trying to tell anyone else what they think.
It's like watching a muppet show parody of Johnny Carson's swami routine.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)Say it isn't so!
Seriously, I don't understand the support that Hamas gets among so many supposedly "liberal" people. Its stated goal is the destruction of Israel. The rabid anti-Israel sentiment I so often see is irrational.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)C'mon, basic stuff, NaturalHigh.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)Brain fart. Mea culpa.
Still...double down on the Hamas stuff.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)"Liberal support for Hamas" is about the same thing as "Support for Ron Paul on DU" - it doesn't really exist, but it's a great talking point for people who want to imagine it does so they can be outraged about it.
Imagine if Zionists spent half as much time making art as they do being pissed about shit in their heads. What might that look like?
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Check for that phrase on Twitter as well.
King_David
(14,851 posts)Extremely illuminating.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)on Google the first site up is Breitbart, if you Google Twitter we are all Hamas now first up is Gatestone Institute, now on twitter is where it gets really interesting when you do a search there you get first a Dutch Rightist who posts the classic picture of a Palestinian child dressed up in 'terrorist' gear along with some stuff that looks like he pulled out of somewhere dark , second you get a really prominent picture of Abbas accompanied by an article charging that the US government is funding Hamas-this was posted within the past week
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Might have something to do with your search history.
I get Al-Monitor, The Guardian, and Shiraz Socialst as my first three.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)also hasn't it been mentioned during another of these now predictable exchanges that sites like Breitbart pay to come up first?
King_David
(14,851 posts)I don't get all the right wing sources that you get.
Try clear your cache, Google learns your favorite sites and lists them high up on your searches.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Light Bridge to Gaza ?@gaza714 Sep 5
Kids are the resistance, mothers are the resistance, because the resistance are the people #WeAreAllHamas
Bassem Masri ?@bassem_masri Aug 29
@SPMurphy67 pictures lie??? Quit spreading #Propaganda on our #heroes in #Palestine #WeAreAllHamas don't mistake that
Falasteen Ya Umi ?@ProductOfPali Aug 27
Support for the resistance is stronger than ever. #LongLiveGaza #WeAreAllHamas #Gaza
imane ?@amylala28 Aug 27
#VictoryForGaza #FreePalestine #WeAreAllHamas #ICC4Israel #ICC4Netanyahu
Farah Aisyah ?@ichazizou Aug 26
VICTORY FOR GAZA. VICTORY FOR THE RESISTANCE !! #WEAREALLHAMAS . ALHAMDULILLAH. ALLAHU AKBAR.
Percy Alvarado Godoy ?@PercyAlvaradoGo Aug 26
Life in Gaza for palestinian children. When will the madness stop?#WeAreAllHamas #GazaUnderAttack #savegaza
Ahmed ?@Ahmed_Haifa77 Aug 24
Students in a school in Hebron,West Bank, during 1st day of school. #GazaUnderAttack #FreePalestine #WeAreAllHamas
Mohammed Hamada ?@moh10ly Aug 24
#Hamas <3 #WeAreAllHamas #كلنا_حماس >> RamAllah goes out in solidarity and support for Resistance and Hamas. http://fb.me/37I0JvKyb
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)It was one among the sample of tweets posted. Hamada added that link at the end of his twitter post.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)I'm not sure you fully understand how Twitter works.
shira
(30,109 posts)In fact, they hate Liberals b/c they're not Left enough so the Liberals are thrown in with centrists and rightwingers...
I wish they were Liberals. Then I'd agree with you that they don't support Hamas.
The reality is that these depraved radical, so called anti-Imperialist, anti-Zionist Leftists support, whitewash, and defend Hamas racism and terror against innocents.
ps,
They're so-called anti-Imperialists b/c they support Imperialist movements like Hamas and Hezbollah. They defend Imperialist Iran. They don't have much problem with Russia's annexation. Any criticism they might have of any aforementioned Imperialist movements does not come close to the hostility they exhibit towards the Jewish state.
Ergo, they're not Liberals.
Dick Dastardly
(937 posts)they are far to the left of the mainstream liberals and Democratic Party views and at most represent the views of only a tiny fraction relegated on the fringe. This group may be small but they are loud and constantly falsely accuse those who disagree with them as being right wingers and or espousing right wing views, while at the same time trying to falsely claim their views are the mainstream liberal and Dem Party views.
The fact is not all views are just either liberal or conservative, many are both, many are disagreeable to both and many are of various shades of difference. Its not always a zero sum game where a particular view lies except to ideologues, fringe elements and extremists.
shira
(30,109 posts)Last edited Fri Dec 19, 2014, 10:26 PM - Edit history (1)
....and feels like a Ginormous waste of time, but your stuff is good stuff.
Haven't seen you at the Worldwide Zionist Conspiracy Lobby (WWZCL) lately. Where you been, bro? They paying you more than me?
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)feel about Israel and its colonialism/illegal settlers/apartheid state?
shira
(30,109 posts)Look at my commentary in the OP.
How am I wrong?
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)how much of this repression relates directly to 'security' arrangements with Israel?
predictable answer in 3 2 1
shira
(30,109 posts)Gaza doesn't have security arrangements with Israel and they're worse towards their own people.
You also prove my point in the OP.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)oh wait accusations of whitewashing well okay then
shira
(30,109 posts)...members in Gaza for attacks against Israel - as per their security arrangement with Israel?
I know when...
It'll happen some time b/w when Hell freezes over and Never.
==============
You're minimizing and explaining away Hamas and the PA's crushing oppression against its own citizens.
Again, proving the point I made in the OP.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)I minimize nothing your replies and accusations suggest a certain discomfort with my query
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)so I understand how you wouldn't be able to handle it.
shira
(30,109 posts)How am I wrong WRT my commentary about bogus supporters of Palestinians from the OP?
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)given the choice, how many Palestinians support the illegal occupation if their country and the apartheid system they live under.
shira
(30,109 posts)If that's why u commented u should have explained why u made that comment.
I didn't know.
But here's the thing: Hamas also crushes all dissent in Gaza - worse than Abbas.
What do u do with that info.?
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Well, Israel pretty much crushes anything Palestinian so who wins there? Given a choice would the crushed Palestinian side with other Palestinians or with Apartheid Israel?
shira
(30,109 posts)Last edited Fri Dec 19, 2014, 07:39 PM - Edit history (8)
We can never have a decent conversation when you do that.
And you do it a lot.
Most of the "crushed" would prefer full Israeli occupation over Hamas and the PA. There's a LOT more evidence of that available, but I warn you that it's a narrative buster for all you believe about I/P. Do you want more evidence of that? And once you see it, how will that change your view?
They had way more rights and freedoms under Israeli control.
I know those rights aren't important to you, like freedom for gays, women, christians, etc. Freedom of speech/dissent, assembly, etc. They had actual JOBS that paid better in Israel, border crossings wide open, no checkpoints, no reason for war....
You know, everyday stuff we take for granted.
Palestinians think those things are kinda important, and why shouldn't they?
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)A) Is from 2006...nearly 14 years out if date and,
B) Did not speak to 'Palestinians' wanting to live under Israeli occupation which shows that;
C) You can shamelessly cut lies from whole cloth.
Were you thinking that nobody would read your outdated and mythical link?
shira
(30,109 posts)Last edited Sat Dec 20, 2014, 04:40 PM - Edit history (3)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/113411071#post9http://www.haaretz.com/weekend/week-s-end/as-gaza-burns-1.219146
=======
Bassem Al-Nabris
Palestinian poet from Khan Younis, Gaza Strip
"If a there was a referendum in the Gaza Strip 'would you like the Israeli occupation to return?' half the population would vote 'yes'... But in practice, I believe that the number of those in favor is at least 70%, if not more - much higher than is assumed by the political analysts and those who follow. For the million and a half people living in this small region, things have gone too far - in practice, not just as a metaphor. with the internal conflicts, but even earlier, in the days of the previous Palestinian administration, which was corrupt and did not give the people even the tiniest hope. The fundamentalist forces which came into power also promised change and reform, but got a siege, with no security and no making a living... If the occupation returns, at least there will be no civil war, and the occupier will have a moral and legal obligation to provide the occupied people with employment and food, which they now lack."
http://www.elaph.com/elaphweb/elaphwriter/2007/5/236709.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/05/world/middleeast/05cnd-mideast.html?pagewanted=all
=======
Al-Hayat Al-Jadida columnist Yahya Rabah wrote: 'When the national unity government was formed, I thought: "This will be a government of national salvation." If a government that includes Fatah, Hamas, other factions and independents associated with various factions has not been able to save the day, it means that no one can, unless Israel decides that its army should intervene. Then it will invade the Gaza Strip, kill and arrest people - but this time not as an occupying force but as an international peace-keeping force. Look what we have come to, how far we have deteriorated, and what we have done to ourselves.' (Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, PA, 15 May 2007)
=======
Palestinian journalist Majed Azzam wrote: 'We should have the courage to acknowledge the truth... The only thing that prevents the chaos and turmoil in Gaza from spreading to the West Bank is the presence of the Israeli occupation in the West Bank... as opposed to its absence from the Gaza Strip.' (Al-Risala, Gaza, 14 May 2007)
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/05/world/middleeast/05cnd-mideast.html?pagewanted=all
=======
"People in Gaza are hoping that Israel will reenter the Gaza Strip, wipe out both Hamas and Fatah, and then withdraw again... They also say that, since the massacres, they miss the Israelis, since Israel is more merciful than who do not even know why they are fighting and killing one another. It's like organized crime, . Once, we resisted Israel together, but now we call for the return of the Israeli army to Gaza."
Faiz Abbas and Muhammad Awwad:
Al-Sinara (Nazareth), May 18, 2007
=======
"Between one murder and another, between one kidnapping and the next... our leaders continue to sit in their seats and to speak of 'resistance,' 'liberation,' 'unity,' and 'return'... They are all liars. The weapons they wish to retain, as the weapons of resistance, are actually weapons of internecine terrorism and murder... You are murdering the cause, people and future... Oh murderers, you have ruined our world, castrated our nationalism, prostituted our resistance... You have turned our lives into hell. hell is preferable... Take your government, your militias, and your gangs and go to hell."
Al-Ayyam (PA), May 17, 2007
=======
"The whole world seems to be talking about the future of the Arabs of Jerusalem, but no one has bothered asking us. The international community and the Israeli Left seem to take it for granted that we want to live under Mr. Arafat's control. We don't. Most of us despise Mr. Arafat and the cronies around him, and we want to stay in Israel. At least here I can speak my mind freely without being dumped in prison, as well as having a chance to earn an honest day's wage."
The Daily Telegraph (London), Jan. 28, 2001.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/1320012/Baraks-hopes-of-last-ditch-peace-deal-dashed-as-talks-end.html?mobile=basic
====
A social worker in Ras al Amud, a mixed Arab-Jewish area in east Jerusalem which Mr Barak has in principle agreed to hand over to Palestinian control, said: "If a secret poll was conducted I am sure an overwhelming majority of Jerusalem Arabs would say they would prefer to stay in Israel."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/1320012/Baraks-hopes-of-last-ditch-peace-deal-dashed-as-talks-end.html?mobile=basic
====
"The hell of Israel is better than the paradise of Arafat. We know Israeli rule stinks, but sometimes we feel like Palestinian rule would be worse."
Abd as-Samiya Abu Subayh, quoted in The Washington Post, July 25, 2000
====
Two polls from Keevoon Research, Strategy & Communications and the Arabic-language newspaper As-Sennara, survey representative samples of adult Israeli Arabs on the issue of joining the PA, and they corroborate what Gheit says. Asked, "Would you prefer to be a citizen of Israel or of a new Palestinian state?" 62 percent want to remain Israeli citizens and 14 percent want to join a future Palestinian state. Asked, "Do you support transferring the Triangle [an Arab-dominated area in northern Israel] to the Palestinian Authority?" 78 percent oppose the idea and 18 percent support it.
I warned you before....
NARRATIVE BUSTER!
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)A) Your first link doesn't work.
B) Your second link (7 years out of date :face palm: ) states nothing about a poll that Gazans have taken wanting reoccupation of Israel. It does mention a journalist mentioning that, but that is not empirical data. It is, however wishful thinking.
C) Your third link (dated again 7 years out of date ) is apparently in arabic. It doesn't have poll data either, does it?
D) Your fourth link (again from 2007
I'm seeing a horrid pattern with you here.) Again has no polling data, but cites a journalist, again, from the second link musing about what Gazans want. That is not imperial data, shira, but it is, again wishful thinking.
E) Your fifth link is the same as your fourth link. Careful with the cut and paste.
F) Your sixth link (13 years out of date ) Has more musings, but nothing else.
G) Same as link six. You're really horrible with the musings.
H-J) Back to articles from 2007
and it is not a poll about Gaza, but about citizens of Israel. The poll does not mention Gazans wanting to be reoccupied.
So once again, shira, you have not failed in the absolute fail department. You have failed magnificently over and over, and I have no doubt that you will succeed in failing in the future.
Happy New Year!
-RDO
shira
(30,109 posts)1. You're not going to find accurate polling data out of the territories. You know why? It's because they're run by totalitarian dictators who oppose any kind of dissent. Same reason you won't find accurate polling data that would disturb the narratives within Russia, N.Korea, China, Saudi Arabia, etc.
But you knew that already. Maybe you didn't, and that's even worse for you...
========================================
2. Those "musings" are hardly out of date. The Palestinians had already been occupied for 40 years. They had already been under Arafat's and Hamas' authority for years.
You're in clear denial. How pitiful.
========================================
3. And I did show you a poll in the very last paragraph of my last post to you. You were asking for polls and you got it.
You punted instead, thinking no one would notice. Total Fail.
========================================
4. But here's ANOTHER poll for you. Not specifically saying Palestinians want occupation, but that they prefer Israel's system of governance way more than the Palestinian authority.
Yet since 1996, Dr. Shikaki has been polling Palestinians about what governments they admire, and every year Israel has been the top performer, at times receiving more than 80 percent approval. The American system has been the next best, followed by the French and then, distantly trailing, the Jordanian and Egyptian.
In its early days, the Palestinian Authority held fourth place, with about 50 percent approval. Now, it is dead last, under 20 percent. Corruption, mismanagement and the stagnation of the Palestinian predicament have turned the culture of criticism against the Palestinian rulers.
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/02/international/middleeast/02LETT.html?pagewanted=1
Imagine that. Up to 80% approval of the (allegedly apartheid) Israeli Government by Palestinians. Over any other government on the planet.
Go on, ignore it, put some stupid smiley emoticons up, claim I failed yet again b/c the poll is over 10 years old and the Palestinians back THEN really didn't know better.
The fact is that Israel's system of governance - what you believe to be among the worst - was rated by Palestinians above any other western liberal democracy in the world. And that's what we call a NARRATIVE BUSTER.
No one serious buys your crap.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Those are you words, may sad friend Shira. Not only did you misrepresent what Palestinians want, but you also cut lies from whole cloth once again. you posted article after article hoping that nobody would read the I guess.
And once again, you have posted an article (from 2003 ...nearly 12 years out of date) that does not say that Gazans want Israel to reoccupy it.
Please stop misrepresenting the truth my poor dishonest friend. Anybody that can read can see you do it, and I am personally embarrassed for you.
shira
(30,109 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Poor, stumbling you.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)by Israel the pull was in 2005 and the Hamas take over was in 2007
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)that the vaudevillian posted in reply to me upthread there is nothing of substance to support their thesis(?) that Gazans want anything to do with Israel
let alone have them back as occupier.
What's worse is that the poster's tired tricks of loading link after link that go nowhere show how run-down and vacant their capacity has become.
There is no bottom to the poor old fellow, and it appears that no amount of reason will ever fill up the hollow old boor.
shira
(30,109 posts)....always onto Israel.
You do that deliberately every single time.
It would be nice to see you condemn other actors besides Israel for SOMETHING every now and then.
shira
(30,109 posts)....of any dissent, implying that if he held more to Hamas' views he wouldn't have to crush all dissent.
Well, Hamas also crushes dissent as terribly as Abbas.
==============
So what do you do with that info. other than deflect? How about acknowledging the obvious and condemning Abbas?
Dick Dastardly
(937 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)shira
(30,109 posts)The resolution calls for secure and recognized borders between the sides.
Meaning the 2 sides must negotiate for a peaceful resolution before the occupation ends.
Now what do you do with this information?
I know, that's not enough proof for you....
Then try this.
----------------------
Do you ignore, move along, and repeat that it's an illegal occupation?
That's what I predict.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)and you support it.
When confronted with that fact you fall to the old belligerent colonial excuses.
shira
(30,109 posts)So let's start there.
===============
You know I wrote in my last response to you that you'd ignore the evidence, probably repeat it again in the future, and move on as if you were never corrected.
I even asked you a few days ago if you could ever admit you're wrong.
===============
Let's see how you respond this time.