Israel/Palestine
Related: About this forumJohn Lewis tells D.C. crowd he will not attend Netanyahu speech
http://mondoweiss.net/2015/02/refuse-netanyahu-speechWhat will be remembered here is the slight against our president and the partisan political nature of it, and I dont know whos served by that, Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) said Tuesday.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)He has gon too far with his machinations and warmongering. He seems to think he has a right to do as he pleases with our government and try to push us into war with Iran. I hope he decides to stay home and work on Peace with his neighbors.
shira
(30,109 posts)1. What you call warmongering (probably WRT the last Gaza war this summer) was in fact a defensive war. Bibi agreed to every ceasefire proposal this summer. Hamas refused every single one.
2. There won't necessarily be a war with Iran. Israel took out Iraq and Syria's nuclear capabilities w/o going to war with either nation.
Wrong. Killing civilians is not defense.
And no, we are not warring with Iran for Bibi.
shira
(30,109 posts)....when Hamas is getting its rocks off firing 100's or even 1000's of rockets at will against the hated Jews into Israel?
Be specific.
You realize Israel took out Syria and Iraq's nuclear capabilities and there was no war either time? Can you at least acknowledge that fact?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)To apologize and compensate the families. To not drop bombs on civilian residences. To not bomb UN shelters. I think Israel is trying to pull the US into a war with Iran and they don't care if we want to go. I do not like the Israeli PM going to congress to undermind my president in his foreign policy in such an arrogant fashion. He shows a lot of distain for the American Left and is tied to the American Right. I am a leftist.
shira
(30,109 posts)Hamas actually wants civilians killed in order to incite hatred against Jews. It's been very effective. What hasn't been effective is that Hamas hasn't been able to tie Israel's hands up completely (UN & NGO pressure as well as a compliant media) so that Israel becomes incapable of defending its citizens.
It turns out WRT wars from the past few decades, Israel is more careful with civilian lives than NATO or any nation within NATO that has been at war since since the 90's.
Do you think Israel's policy (even if hidden) is to deliberately kill civilians?
You have yet to tell me what Israel is allowed to do in order to protect its civilians from 100's or 1000's of rockets.
Still waiting for that.
I didn't think you'd acknowledge the fact that taking out Iraq and Syria's nuclear capabilities did not result in war.
The timing is certainly wrong, but Iran gaining nuclear capacity is not only a threat to Israel, but to the world. It would be EXTREMELY bad - actually horrible - if Iran has the bomb. I think Netanyahu should do all he can to ensure Iran doesn't get nukes. He should've been smarter in doing so.
Of course. He's a rightwinger. That's what they do.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)If Israel want to be rightwing, why should we on the left support Israel. I trust MY President to negotiate with Iran without Bibi trying to undermine him at all costs. He has made this an issue where sides will be taken.
I do not need to solve world peace to have the wherewithal to say, killing civilians is wrong and I don't want to help Israel kill Palestinians.
You go after the people launching rockets and leave the civilians out of it. If you have to kill a thousand babies to protect yourself, I won't forget. Nobody will. The grandchildren of the dead will kill the grandchildren of their killers, and so on and so forth.
shira
(30,109 posts)....before reacting to Hamas' 100's of rockets. This was the same week right before Israel started going after Hamas.
It also doesn't seem like mowing the lawn when Israel agreed to all ceasefire proposals. If Hamas had agreed to the 1st one, there would have been maybe 100-200 casualties at most (terrorists included). It's telling that Palestine's so-called supporters don't hold Hamas accountable for any of that. If you all cared about children, you'd have BEGGED Hamas to agree with every ceasefire proposal.
If Israel want to be rightwing, why should we on the left support Israel.
You wouldn't support Israel even with the most liberal, leftwing Zionists in control. So I ask you, why wouldn't you support Israel with even the most leftwing Zionist leadership?
I trust MY President to negotiate with Iran without Bibi trying to undermine him at all costs. He has made this an issue where sides will be taken.
I'm not sure he's undermining our President when he speaks for the vast majority of Israelis who are scared shitless of a nuclear Iran. Iran is already at war with Israel (through Hamas and Hezbollah). If the Iranians would do that without nukes, imagine what they'd do with them. Israel would be one press of a button away from another 6 million dead Jews. That's not acceptable.
I do not need to solve world peace to have the wherewithal to say, killing civilians is wrong and I don't want to help Israel kill Palestinians.
What you're really against is Israeli self-defense. How do I know this? You have yet to tell me what Israel can do to properly defend its citizens. You can say you're against this and that, but assuming Israel does what you say - where does that leave them WRT to defending against Hamas? What can they do? Waiting...
You go after the people launching rockets and leave the civilians out of it. If you have to kill a thousand babies to protect yourself, I won't forget. Nobody will. The grandchildren of the dead will kill the grandchildren of their killers, and so on and so forth.
Israel does go after the people launching rockets. When Hamas embeds themselves within the population (a war crime) daring Israel to strike, where does that leave Israel? What can they do? If Israel doesn't strike a legit target, then their own citizens are at risk.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)It was all wrong of course, but expected. I like how you know my innermost thoughts and feelings, and what I would do. I don't even need to think now, with the way you do all of the thinking for ne and respond to yourself for me.
shira
(30,109 posts)Sorry about reading your mind, but riddle me this:
Let's say leftwing Zionists are leading the Israeli government. It's happened before going back to Ben Gurion, Golda Meir, Rabin....
Would you support Israel?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Or my thoughts and whatever.
My support would depend on many factors. The first would be declared borders and return of confucated property and payments to those harmed.
shira
(30,109 posts)If they did that, you'd support Israel?
See, I doubt it. Israel's leaders like Ehud Barak & Ehud Olmert (they're not really Leftwingers) have already offered to declare borders and pay reparations in their peace offers that Palestinians rejected. Where's the support? That's why I call BS...
bravenak
(34,648 posts)And I'd support palestine so long as they worked on defense not offense.
shira
(30,109 posts)....that would've ended the occupation and settlements. Offers that would have resulted in a state of Palestine.
From what I've seen, Israel's most hostile critics actually support the Palestinians rejecting each offer. Those offers would have granted the Palestinians nearly everything they'd been asking for. The Palestinians didn't even come back with counter-offers. These proposals were rejected wholesale.
How is Israel at fault for that?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)They have nothing. Israel dictates the deal and has US on their side. The deals were probably not fair. The occupier needs to leave.
shira
(30,109 posts)They would get the equivalent of 100% of pre-67 territory. End of occupation. End of settlements. Compensation for refugees. Half of Jerusalem.
================
Actually, the occupier did leave - Gaza in 2005. There have been no Jews in Gaza ever since. How'd that work out? Badly, right? Why would Israelis want to repeat that for the W.Bank? They're not suicidal.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)The Jews left Gaza, for sure. Now Gaza gets bombed every so often, when lawns need mowing.
shira
(30,109 posts)Hamas benefited, no one else did.
Leaving the W.Bank would also benefit no one except for the leadership. The Palestinians would also have no incentive to work towards peace. You're advocating for more war whether you realize it or not.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I want the Palestinians to control their borders and harbors. And to be able to defend against bomb on babies. Everybody deserves self defense.
shira
(30,109 posts)You're advocating for the latter. Between 2 shitty choices, I think the decision is easy. Choose the lesser of 2 evils.
Okay, but not at the expense of MANY others who would pay in blood.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Self defense, but not at the expense of innocent babies in Palestine. Defend your border. Declare a damn border, first! Stay on that side until healing can occur. Land grabs just make more enemys as do the killings of unarmed youths and settler violence and bombing schools.
Many children and innocent civilians paid in blood for Israeli 'security'.
shira
(30,109 posts)....when you show you're against it in all practical ways.
You have yet to tell me what Israel can do.
=======================
The way I read what you're saying is that you'd rather see dead Israeli babies than Palestinians ones. Since Israel shouldn't respond militarily to Hamas' rockets and other terror attacks, that would be the result.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Or UN shelters! When that happens self defense just sounds like a big ass lie. An excuse.
The occupation has something to do with the rockets, I suspect. All the indignities they are forced to bear. It's not like Israel is NICE to Palestinians. They cannot even import the food they want and have electricity all the time. They have shitty water, literally. I'd be pissed too.
shira
(30,109 posts)....for shits and giggles. If you believe that, it's no wonder why you hate Israel. The problem with believing in the worst from the IDF is that killing innocents by design doesn't benefit the IDF one bit. Aside from pretty much everyone in Israel being totally against killing innocents, targeting innocents actually prevents them from their military objectives against Hamas. Israel isn't stupid. They KNOW what killing innocents does to their efforts to stop terrorism. Those dead innocents benefit Hamas, not Israel. Israel does its best NOT to help Hamas out.
This isn't rocket science.
Another problem is that you don't seem to care about Hamas firing from schools, UN buildings, the beach, etc. Hamas appreciates that, BTW. It motivates them to do more of the same which results in deaths of innocents. They'll repeat the same war crimes in the next war, knowing their western friends will defend against their war crimes.
You also don't want to hear that in EVERY war that has ever been, mistakes were made. That's one reason war really sucks. For some reason you believe Israel should be perfect, even more perfect than any other nations on the planet engaged in war. Israel is so advanced, you probably believe they have the capability somehow (that no one else has) of only killing bad guys. Therefore, there can be no mistakes ever. So Israel targets innocents.
They can import any food they want. Electricity is also controlled by Egypt. You must believe Hamas and the PLO actually care about water quality. That's a real laugher. They're terrorist thugs who don't want to be bothered by mundane things like repairing roads, building schools, housing refugees, or working on water quality. That's not what they want to do. It's not what ISIS wants to do either.
Honestly, you just don't get it. I don't think you want to get it.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)That is what I see. I don't hate Israel. Just have no reason to LIKE Israel. It's not rocket science. I don't even like drone program we have here and did not support the Iraq war. I tend to blame us for the million dead Iraqis. I don't blame them for sure. Bushco. Didn't Israel provide evidence for that too? See? I try to like Israel, but they are rightwingers.
I do not believe that Egypt controls ALL of the electricity of the entirety of palestine. Seems like a lie. And yes, I do think Hamas wants to drink clean water. They ARE people, right? Peopke want not shitty water.
I don't expect perfection. But, Hamas, the terrorists, seem to kill fewer civilians by thousands, and they're evil. So what does that make the folks who kill thousands?
shira
(30,109 posts)They've absorbed the vast majority of rocket attacks for about the past 10 years. It doesn't cross your mind that they're cheering on the IDF for attacking Hamas? The same Hamas dedicated to killing Jews everywhere on Earth?
I didn't say Egypt controls ALL electricity into Gaza.
Hamas cares about Hamas, not the other 95-99% of Gazans they use and abuse on a daily basis. They'd rather put their resources into attacking Israel rather than improving water quality. When cement is imported into Gaza, it's almost all used for terror purposes; NOT to help Gazans out. This is how Hamas operates. This is basic I/P 101.
After all our posts to each other today, you still believe the IDF follows some evil policy that calls for the targeting of civilians? Seriously? Despite IDF soldiers having the absolute right to refuse such orders? Holy shit! What does it take to get the point through?
Now I'm going to use your logic on you. It's an absolute fact Israel is more careful WRT civilians during war than any other nation on the planet (including NATO nations). These NATO nations do not have to worry about their civilians under constant threat. No one calls for the annihilation of these NATO nations. They choose to fight wars FAR away from their own borders. Israel has serious issues just a few miles away from their major population centers (Hamas, Hezbollah, Al Qaeda, ISIS). Yet when attacked, they are still more careful WRT civilians than any western nation. Imagine what western nations would do if their own civilians were being attacked.
So according to your reasoning, if Israel is so bad then EVERY other nation on the planet is worse due to their record WRT civilians killed in combat.
You must agree with that, right?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Bombing schools and hospitals is NOT CAREFUL!!! Neither is bombing UN shelters and apartment buildings. Don't think I give us a pass. I don't. I'll not be voting for any warmongers here and will always say we were wrong and we MURDERED many thousands of Iraqis. Israel is just like us.
I think our presense in the region is wrong. We go to steal oil and kill Arabs and weaken the region. Cause disruption.
I think the IDF policy of bombing hospitals was a policy that was Evil. And yes, I think bombing hospitals is always intentional. They knew it was a hospital when they rropped the bomb. Its not like the hospital switched places with another building. Those people were already injured from bombings and could not check ID to make sure Hamas is not there. Yes. I think bombing UN shelters after saying they would not bomb UN shelters was an intentional policy to harm those who had evacuated to the shelters. Yes. It's obvious as a fart. Yes. I think bombing apartments is a way to maximize the kills with the keast amount of bombs. Very cost effective and deadly. As it was THE POLICY, Yes, think it was intentional to kill anyone in the building. Yes. It is the policy. Its obvious to everyone, from Chile to Iceland. Obvious. And googleable. We can google it very easily.
shira
(30,109 posts)....seems to get through. You just block it out. You have your beliefs and nothing can change them.
I've debated some religious fundies who are just as impervious to facts and reasoning. No amount of facts is ever enough for them either. Reason is thrown out the door.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)When you find some let us know.
shira
(30,109 posts)....the wrong side of history.
You think you have facts that show otherwise?
Bring them!
Or fold, as you usually do.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)and you find it reasonable that Israelis squat on Palestinian land... something about Israel not transferring them... which is an outright lie, why would I expect you to do anything but birth falsehoods and half truths?
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Ironic turn of phrase there, given the situation.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)During the Gaza war, the IDF gave people only 58 seconds of warning time before bombing. That isn't enough time for anyone to get to safety. It should have been a five minute warning, with some indication of which way people should run.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)After the Six Day War, Ben-Gurion called on the Israeli government to immediately relinquish control of all the territories the'd taken in the war. Also, the Israeli government waited until after "BG"s death in 1973 to begin the settlement project, because they knew he'd have denounced it if he was still alive when it happened.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)it has to do"?
Why should anyone give any government anywhere that kind of support? Most people here don't give OUR government thar kind of support.
The facts are that the IDF hasn't ever been stopped from doing what it wanted to do, and that nothing would be different in the I/P situation if the world community had agreed never to publicly criticize Israel.
The problem has never been lack of unquestioning support for Israeli military tactics-it's been that those tactics have been arrogant and heavy-handed and have usually just made everything worse.
Just as bombing Iran could have no possible effect other than to make everything worse.
What Netanyahu is doing and what he wants to do are horribly bad for the cause of Israeli security-especially his continued efforts to prevent the creation of a Palestinian state-a state that has to come into being before it can even be possible for the Arab/Muslim world to formally recognize Israel.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)I'm not sure he's undermining our President when he speaks for the vast majority of Israelis who are scared shitless of a nuclear Iran.
I'm pretty sure that Bravenak lives in the US, too. I'm pretty sure that Bravenak's loyalty is to the US, not Israel. Hey, Israel is our ally, and I feel for the Israeli people, but our loyalty is FIRST to the US and to OUR President and country.
If it seems I'm not mincing words on this, you are absolutely correct. I am a US citizen before all else, and my loyalty is to my country first and foremost. We know how much blood we have shed and how much of our country's wealth has been expended on wars in the Middle East, since we are the ones that paid the price.
I will not ask for apologies nor will I take a step back for our President being wise enough to not leap immediately into sanctions with Iran (which of course would likely lead to war with Iran). Anyone that is in favor of war with Iran is invited to personally engage in it themselves. The rest of us prefer a less bloody, less costly path - you can include me in that number.
Dick Dastardly
(937 posts)Except for some who use double standards when it comes to Israel.
Its an unfortunate but true fact that civilians die from those taking measures to defend themselves in all conflicts. Especially when ffighting someone like Hamas who uses civilians as shields.Israel did not target civilians unlike Hamas. Far more civilians would have been killed if Israel was targeting civilians or operating recklessly. Far more civilians would have been killed if Israel did not take steps it was not even required to take and which also put its citizens at greater risk in an effort to minimize civilian casualties. Far less civilians would have been killed if Hamas had not purposely put civilians in harms way as a tactic.
Under international law Just because civilians are killed does not mean an action was not defensive nor does it make it a warcrime. Under international law the presence of civilians does not preclude or prevent taking military action. Hell, lots of German civilians were killed by the Allies but that did not change the fact the Allies were defending themselves from German aggression nor did it make their actions a, warcrime.
Israel like all countries has a higher duty to protect its citizens (both civilian and military) over that of enemy citizens. Even so Israel took extraordinary steps to minimize enemy civilian casualties at the expense of its own citizens safety. The steps were far more than Israel was required to take as well as far more than any other country would take in its position. Despite such steps not only was Israel falsely accused by some of what would be real warcrimes by any standard, but even more ridiculously they were also accused of violating standards nonexistent in international law nor that anyone else is held to. What's funny is that while Hamas actually does target civilians, use them as shields, hide weapons in shelters and commit a myriad of other real warcrimes some just ignore them and or even are apologists for them while at the same time screaming about Israel's nonexistent violations.
It seems some don't want Israel to do anything to defend itself.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Bombing UN shelters, not self defense. Bombing schools, not self defense. Killing those kids on the beach? Not self defense. Bombing hospitals where the injured evacuated to, not self defense. Telling people to evacuate and then bombing the shelters they evacuated to, not self defense. Bombing large apartment buildings, wiping out whole families 2 minutes after an evacuation call? Not self defense. See? I can tell self defense. Maybe because I learned Judo and not kickboxing.
I can let the death toll speak for itself. 3 dead Israeli civilians. 2000 dead Palestinian civilians. Not self defense.
Seem like some people only value the lives of Israelis and do not mind collective punishment. Which is a crime. If you kill my baby to get to my downstairs neighbor, I will find you and return the favor. That is what killing a bunch of civilians brings. We dropped those bombs on Iraq and acted surprised as fuck when they used IED's on us. And suicide bombers. I was not surprised.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)And no good can ever come from bombing Iran.
shira
(30,109 posts)MLK believed it too.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/113494632#post39
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I'm sure he would look at Israel as it is TODAY, and then decide whether to support it or not. It is not 1964 anymore, hon. Times have changed and th situation is different now. Besides. Your logical fallacies are piling up and its killing me not to point them out.
The 'Authority argument' never works on me, nor does the 'Popularity argument'. I do not care what MLK said about it 50 years ago. I'm more of a Malcolm X (in his radical stage) fan. I have this strange problem where I have to think for myself.
Edit: I can't find where JL said that so I say nothing.
shira
(30,109 posts)You believe MLK would oppose Israeli policy & that would make him antizionist today?
Hell, almost all Zionists oppose at least some of Israel's policies - one way or another. That doesn't make all zionists into anti-zionists. Our POTUS remains a Zionist despite the fact he has major issues with Israeli policy.
===================
You and I both know that when anti-zionists criticize Zionists for whatever's going on, they are w/o question using code to cover for the fact they're referring to Jews. Thus, this opposition to Zionists (Jews) is clearly anti-semitism. Anti-Zionism = Antisemitism. This is such a no-brainer, I dare you to deny it.
===================
And to top it off, you believe 50 years later that MLK would become an anti-zionist......after he made himself clear that anti-zionists are bigoted Jew haters?
For real?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Not nice. I said. I think he could decide for himself how he sees it. I don't know what he would b today. Neither do you. I think he'd strongly oppose the occupation and siege.
Dare taken. I deny it!!!
I use Zionists for Zionists and Israel for Israel and Jew for Jew and black for black and woman for women. Crazy huh? People knowing words and how they should be used. I'm sorry you are not used to that, but America is not 1940's Europe and it disgusts me that you treat me as though I am a antisemite just because I do not like what Zionism has become. Maybe Zionism has changed. And not for the good. And should take its own inventory before lashing out and calling others racist antisemites while they have racist Zionist rallies against blacks and Arabs in their cities.
Unless you think only racism against Jews is bad, but not when Jews do it to me and mine?
Very strange you want to associate Dr. king with those racist people who hate blacks. Or maybe you deny that those racists in the streets were Zionists? I don't get it. Why would he be Zionist after seeing stuff like that? It's not like Zionists have been making common cause with African Americn citizens. They link up with republicans and conservative christians. He was a liberal.
You seem not to understand. I'll spell it out plainly. Israel has become rightwing as has Zionism. That's why Americans are AntiZionist. We are not Europe and you can stop with the antisemitism libel. We did not do that. Go lay blame in the villians. We fought to save the Jews. Not to oppress them. The accusations of antisemitism are unwarranted and cause support to drop.
shira
(30,109 posts)...makes one a NON-supporter of Israel, that's going to be news to all the liberal/leftwing supporters of Israel.
You need to realize supporting Israel almost always means supporting its existence, not necessarily its government policies. Zionists support Israel's well being no matter whether Leftists or Rightists are in control of the government.
Nearly all LEADING anti-Zionists criticize Zionists when the context of their statements definitely means they're attacking Jews.
Where do I even begin with the following nonsense?
Very strange you want to associate Dr. king with those racist people who hate blacks. Or maybe you deny that those racists in the streets were Zionists? I don't get it. Why would he be Zionist after seeing stuff like that? It's not like Zionists have been making common cause with African Americn citizens. They link up with republicans and conservative christians. He was a liberal.
Zionism isn't about hating Blacks and Arabs. The vast, vast majority of Zionists have no problem condemning & shaming racist Israelis. The Israeli government, even Bibi's government, makes it clear racism and hatred shouldn't be tolerated. He'd be out on his ass if he didn't because Israelis wouldn't tolerate a POS racist running the government.
Dr. King would definitely associate with Zionism, not scummy POS racists who happen to be Zionists. There's a big difference, do you now understand?
Zionists (meaning Jews, you're slipping now) HISTORICALLY have made common cause with African American citizens. Where the hell have you been? Jews have been DISPROPORTIONATELY involved with the civil rights movement. More than any other religious or ethnic group. It's been that way and still is.
Over 70% of Jewish Zionists voted for Obama TWICE, in both 2008 and 2012. That's been the norm going back to at least the Roosevelt days.
You're confused. Most Israelis (and Jews) are liberal by American standards. Hence, over 70% support for Obama in both elections.
Also, American support for Israel has steadily risen the past few decades. Jews know America is a safe haven. That's why nearly half of the planet's Jews actually live in America. I don't know where you're getting that Zionists (Jews) are accusing America of being antisemitic. Israel's greatest supporter is the USA.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)And no. The outreach is not an ongoing thing between us. It was in the past about forty year ago, but Zionist groups have been reaching out to the Right in America in my lifetime. Jewish Americans are not the same thing as Israeli Zionists. Just because people helped in the padt does not mean they are on our side now. When Israel is tied to the Republican party, much more than the democratic party, you see a drop in support. African americans have been moving towards neutrality, younger Americans towards palestine. This is during the last ten years. Israel is tied to the American right wing. The American right wing is pretty much racist. If they make common cause with the racist right wing, I cannot support them. Hence the fact that some Dems are not going to Bibi's speech. Especially with the leader of Israel and prominent Zionist being so disrespectful to the first black president of the USA in a way that smacks of racist intent. And cozying up to the right.
I have not seen much support from Israel or Zionists groups for our president. I have no idea why you think support for Israel is rising. If the left in Israel was in power, I'd be supportive.
shira
(30,109 posts)Is that what u mean by "calling us names"?
I haven't met an anti-zionist yet who hasn't been pro-Hamas in someway or another. All major American anti-Zionist outlets appear to support Hamas terror attacks against innocents. If you want proof, I can easily provide it.
We're talking a pretty small % of Americans here. Small because the vast majority of Americans know how odious anti-zionist beliefs are. They're not fooled. Americans support Israel by over 4-1 over Palestinians, in each battle Israel has been in against Hamas or the PLO (like in 2002, 2009, 2012, 2014). Each and every time, and that support hasn't dropped off. 93% of American Jews supported Israel in Gaza this past summer, while 95% of Israeli Jews supported Israel this summer. The last link from Haaretz shows 95% support from Israel's Jewish moderate Left, and 67% among Leftwing Jews. What does this tell you about almost all Jews worldwide? You don't think we realize how serious the threat is for Israel & how we have no choice but to defend ourselves?
Now, name one Democratic Senator or Congressman in office who is an anti-zionist. I'll help u out here. There are none. What does that tell you? When u vote Democrat, you're voting for mostly non-Jewish liberal democratic zionists who support Israel's right to exist in peace. You're supporting "horrible racists" whose only crime is simply to support the Jews' right to life in their ancestral homeland against enemies (Hamas & Co.) who want Jews dead worldwide. I've learned that anti-zionists don't give a crap about Jews' human rights or right to live in peace within Israel.
As to American support for Israel, it's grown since the '60s.
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/US-Israel/American_attitudes_toward_Israel.html
Finally, that crap about Jews being rightwing is absurd, given that more than 70% of Jews voted Obama in both 2008 and 2012.
You're out of your depth here.
shira
(30,109 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)You do these threads and think u won and i'm happy for you. Support is still slipping and will continue. Calling people jew haters over and over can get wearying. I'm just tired of being accused of supporting terror or killing jews or whatever for not being a zionist. I'm even less of one now, thanks to you and your bullying.
Response to bravenak (Reply #75)
Post removed
bravenak
(34,648 posts)But the accusations get in the way. Then I look at the culture and realize I don't like it. Our senators and congressmen don't show up at racist rallys against black people in our capital. If Israel expects support from All Americans, they need to probably not have a bunch of racists in the knesset, a policy of deporting blacks, and a PM who talks about blacks upsetting the balance of the state and promising to send them away. Xenophobia is harsh. I do not see Israel as an ally. Have you ever thought about how offensive it us to demand support of a black person for a nation that treats blacks worse than we do here? How rude and obnoxious! People are racist against them so they go there and are racist against us and demand our support or else WE'RE the racists? Very demanding.
Why should black people support Israel? You cannot give an answer.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)That's the argument in a nutshell with Israel, really.
We are expected to bow, give our unconditional support, ignore the human rights abuses, ignore the land theft, ignore the murdered children, and in return we aren't called antisemites indirectly by knob-heads that will willfully ignore all the bad that Israel generates.
In addition, the one that you have been conversing with believes that there is no occupation/settlement of illegal Israel settlers in the West Bank by Israel.
They just all decided to move there by themselves...like magic...with IDF firepower to back them up. They don't mention, however, that the 4th Geneva convention expressly prohibits population transfers into occupied territory. But they have a workaround. The settlers just did it by themselves.
By magic.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)More Harry Potter direct controlled magic than ASOIAF nature magic. They say a few words and Boom! We must accept.
I'll be waiting for an answer for why it's racist not to support a nation that (seems to) hates your kind and ships them off to die in Sudan or somewhere else. I do not see why I owe such allegiance to their supremacy in Israel over everyon else in the area. Very confusing.
King_David
(14,851 posts)Mondoweiss is a vanity blog that can not be considered a valued source under any circumstance.
shira
(30,109 posts)...be trusted about anything related to Jews, like Israel.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)as you seem to claim here on another thread
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1134&pid=94653
shira
(30,109 posts)(San Francisco Chronicle)
I have a dream for peace in the Middle East
Martin Luther King Jr.s special bond with Israel
by John Lewis
THE REV. MARTIN Luther King Jr. understood the meaning of discrimination and oppression. He sought ways to achieve liberation and peace, and he thus understood that a special relationship exists between African Americans and American Jews.
This message was true in his time and is true today.
He knew that both peoples were uprooted involuntarily from their homelands. He knew that both peoples were shaped by the tragic experience of slavery. He knew that both peoples were forced to live in ghettoes, victims of segregation.
He knew that both peoples were subject to laws passed with the particular intent of oppressing them simply because they were Jewish or black. He knew that both peoples have been subjected to oppression and genocide on a level unprecedented in history.
King understood how important it is not to stand by in the face of injustice. He understood the cry, Let my people go.
Long before the plight of the Jews in the Soviet Union was on the front pages, he raised his voice. I cannot stand idly by, even though I happen to live in the United States and even though I happen to be an American Negro and not be concerned about what happens to the Jews in Soviet Russia. For what happens to them happens to me and you, and we must be concerned.
During his lifetime King witnessed the birth of Israel and the continuing struggle to build a nation. He consistently reiterated his stand on the Israeli-Arab conflict, stating Israels right to exist as a state in security is uncontestable. It was no accident that King emphasized security in his statements on the Middle East.
On March 25, 1968, less than two weeks before his tragic death, he spoke out with clarity and directness stating, peace for Israel means security, and we must stand with all our might to protect its right to exist, its territorial integrity. I see Israel as one of the great outposts of democracy in the world, and a marvelous example of what can be done, how desert land can be transformed into an oasis of brotherhood and democracy. Peace for Israel means security and that security must be a reality.
During the recent U.N. Conference on Racism held in Durban, South Africa, we were all shocked by the attacks on Jews, Israel and Zionism. The United States of America stood up against these vicious attacks.
Once again, the words of King ran through my memory, I solemnly pledge to do my utmost to uphold the fair name of the Jews-because bigotry in any form is an affront to us all.
snip
King had a dream of an oasis of brotherhood and democracy in the Middle East.
As we celebrate his life and legacy, let us work for the day when Israelis and Palestinians, Jews and Muslims, will be able to sit in peace under his vine and fig tree and none shall make him afraid.
U.S. Rep. John Lewis, a Democrat, represents the 5th Congressional District of Georgia and worked closely with Martin Luther King Jr. during the civil rights movement.
Full article HERE.
It isn't just Lewis who believes anti-zionism is antisemitism. He quotes MLK saying the very same thing.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)as far as MLK goes he supposedly said that in 1964, if that's the best you can do ............
shira
(30,109 posts)Pitiful, actually.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)it is all extrapolation nothing more nothing less and it was 13 years ago-MLK's quote was supposedly made in 1968 (I've seen various dates over the years) almost half a century ago, well before the settlement/colonization of Palestine enterprise took the form we it in today, are you seriously saying that opinions about Israel are static unchanging never evolving? Pitiful alright I agree
King_David
(14,851 posts)So I hope you not accusing Lewis of antisemitism when in fact he's a strong proud friend of the Jewish people...
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)a simple yes or no will do
King_David
(14,851 posts)thats fact not opinion.
I encourage you to read our Jewish group and learn more.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)King_David
(14,851 posts)So if there's a self admitted AntiZionist or self admitted antisemite or self admitted Islamaphobe or self admitted homophobe on DU it's all the same thing . Hopefully and optimistically this is not the case.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Keep on shouting it all you want, dave.
Criticism of Israel does not equal anti-Semitism...no matter how hard some scream it.
King_David
(14,851 posts)AntiZionism as the PM of France Judge in Berlin MLK remind us ( not David Duke or Rense ) is Jew Hatred
Remember this.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Remember that.
King_David
(14,851 posts)Last edited Sat Feb 7, 2015, 02:08 AM - Edit history (1)
They want.
We support democratic party principles here on DU and Antizionism and antisemitism are the antithesis of such.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Sure, and some can choose to find phantoms where none exist as well, dave.
King_David
(14,851 posts)French PM Valls:'Anti-Zionism is cover up for AntiSemitism
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Have you ever considered for a moment that Israel's victimizing the Palestinians on a daily basis is actually a very bad thing and is fueling the unjust fires of retribution?
If England were terrorizing the Irish in the Emerald Isle and planting their problem children in illegal settlements anywhere they wanted, while killing Irish children indiscriminately, I would expect that many people would hate the British anywhere they lived.
I don't condone violence against anybody: Israeli or Palestinian.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)AntiZionist...AntiSemite has been so watered down by the screamers as to have lost its meaning.
shira
(30,109 posts)Here's Lewis:
MLK said the same thing...
Clarence B. Jones, personal attorney and close adviser to Martin Luther King Jr.
Martin warned repeatedly that anti-Semitism would soon be disguised as anti-Zionism.
Clarence B. Jones, personal attorney and close adviser to Martin Luther King Jr.
Lewis totally agreed with MLK.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)and it seems you agree with MLK's attorney's posthumous claims
shira
(30,109 posts)Do you doubt anything else MLK said, or do you just doubt this one thing for convenient reasons?
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)shira
(30,109 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)starting with the NYC teachers strike May-November 1968 all the way to the Crown Heights riots in 1991 the relationship between the Black and Jewish communities is not the same as it was in the early 1960's, it is an unfortunate fact but Obama mentioned the need to rebuild the Black Jewish relationship during his 2008 Presidential campaign
I find the claims that MLK would have supported Israel's actions as fervently a he did in 1968 a bit speculative and I'm being very polite
shira
(30,109 posts)I don't doubt MLK would be critical of some of Israel's more rightwing policies.
That would make him a liberal zionist, but still a zionist nonetheless.
To think he would become an anti-zionist is extremely far-fetched, considering he believed anti-zionism = antisemitism. He wouldn't want anything to do with such a racist movement.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)shira
(30,109 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)that despite the twists and turn and goalpost changes we've been on
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)I doubt that any civil rights leader would be supporting any country that practiced apartheid, but they really have to say that for themselves.
libodem
(19,288 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Is participating in a Republican/Likud scheme to both sabotage the diplomatic efforts of a Democratic president AND use Congress as a prop to influence the outcome of the Israeli general election campaign.
It's a plot against both a negotiated solution to the Iran nuclear situation and the moderate and progressive parties in Israeli politics.
Diplomacy is working and Netanyahu doesn't deserve a free campaign ad on U.S. television.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)US veeps planned no-show at PMs Congress speech has the Hebrew media split between telling Netanyahu to stand his ground and urging him to back off before its too late
US Vice President Joe Bidens apparent snub of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, as the American leader indicated he would not attend a speech the Israeli leader is scheduled to give before Congress on March 3, has the Hebrew press riled up Sunday morning.
The front pages of both Yedioth Ahronoth and Israel Hayom dramatically illustrate the growing gap in Israel-US relations, though opinion writers in each paper offer opposing pieces of advice to the Israeli leader on how to deal with the situation.
In Yedioth, the words the rift are placarded in big letters beneath images of Netanyahu and Biden, their faces stern on opposing sides of the page.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)Mondoweiss again? Can't you find a site that doesn't revel in being anti-Israel?