Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 10:09 PM Mar 2015

White House will go after AIPAC next — Newsweek

http://mondoweiss.net/2015/03/after-aipac-newsweek

Another important report in Newsweek says that Netanyahu alienated a crucial constituency he needed to block an Iran deal: black Congresspeople. They disliked his upstaging of Obama, most of them boycotted his speech, and they saw his racebaiting on election day:

According to aides, the South Carolina Democrat [James Clyburn] bluntly told [Israeli legislator Yuli] Edelstein he regarded the prime minister’s upcoming speech as an “affront to America’s first black president.”…

But for black Democrats like Clyburn, it was Netanyahu’s coded election-day warning that Israel’s Arab citizens were headed to the polls “in droves” to vote him out of office that pushed them from anger to outrage. Netanyahu later apologized for his remark, but his contrition appeared to have no effect on Clyburn and company. “The Congressional Black Caucus is gone,” a Democratic congressional aide told Newsweek, referring to its support for Israel under Netanyahu.

As negotiators from the U.S., Iran and five major powers close in on a framework nuclear accord in Geneva to meet an end-of-March deadline, Netanyahu’s loss of black support on Capitol Hill probably means he’s lost his gamble to create a way for Congress to pass a bill that would block an agreement. “Bibi,” a congressional aide said, using Netanyahu’s nickname, “ensured there will be no veto-proof majority in the House.”

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White House will go after AIPAC next — Newsweek (Original Post) R. Daneel Olivaw Mar 2015 OP
So this is Mondoweiss doing a summary of a Newsweek article? oberliner Mar 2015 #1
Must really burn your backside that things are falling apart. R. Daneel Olivaw Mar 2015 #2
Actually, I'd like to know too, R. Daneel Olivaw.... It is Tuesday Mar 2015 #3
... R. Daneel Olivaw Mar 2015 #9
Back from what? It is Tuesday Mar 2015 #10
Yep, it's gotta hurt. BillZBubb Mar 2015 #4
The Newsweek article says the same thing. procon Mar 2015 #6
The president needs to start calling it by its real name: IPAC. BillZBubb Mar 2015 #5
About friggen time, Wellstone ruled Mar 2015 #7
AIPAC's forced estrangement of the Congressional Black Caucus is the most offensive leveymg Mar 2015 #8
Nobody could have done more to drive a stake into the heart of the U.S/Israeli relationship 4now Mar 2015 #11
Newsweak tends to be full of shit, and particularly where the Middle East is concerned. bemildred Mar 2015 #12
Much as you like Mondoweiss? oberliner Mar 2015 #13
Don't tempt me with hanging pitches like that. bemildred Mar 2015 #14
I don't think you are on the same side as Mondoweiss oberliner Mar 2015 #15
Yeah, what would I know about it anyway? nt bemildred Mar 2015 #18
People should not be believing in MondoWeiss It is Tuesday Mar 2015 #16
So basically I should only listen to people like you, on the internet, who will tell me the truth? bemildred Mar 2015 #17
No. Don't listen to me.. Listen to other people.. It is Tuesday Mar 2015 #19
I just said I don't read them for news and got snarled at. bemildred Mar 2015 #20
 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
1. So this is Mondoweiss doing a summary of a Newsweek article?
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 10:33 PM
Mar 2015

Why not just post the actual article from Newsweek?

 

It is Tuesday

(93 posts)
3. Actually, I'd like to know too, R. Daneel Olivaw....
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 10:41 PM
Mar 2015

why don't you tell me instead of insulting other people?

 

It is Tuesday

(93 posts)
10. Back from what?
Sat Mar 28, 2015, 12:28 AM
Mar 2015

I just saw this OP on Latest Threads, and you posted without facts.

I have no idea what you are talking about - perhaps you can enlighten me?

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
8. AIPAC's forced estrangement of the Congressional Black Caucus is the most offensive
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 11:38 PM
Mar 2015

The armtwisting by AIPAC to sign onto the House letter against Obama the unforgivable act of Israel. There will be a reconning.

4now

(1,596 posts)
11. Nobody could have done more to drive a stake into the heart of the U.S/Israeli relationship
Sat Mar 28, 2015, 02:42 AM
Mar 2015

then Netanyahu.
Thanks Bibi.(you murderous clod)

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
12. Newsweak tends to be full of shit, and particularly where the Middle East is concerned.
Sat Mar 28, 2015, 06:33 AM
Mar 2015

Much as I like MondoWeiss I must agree that this smacks of being too eager for the supporting news item.

And I will be really surprised if Obama "goes after" AIPAC; that is the sort of thing AIPAC does, not the sort of thing Obama does. AIPAC "goes after" people, Obama is more of an "OK, I'll let you destroy yourself if that is what you REALLY want, but let's talk first" sort of guy.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
14. Don't tempt me with hanging pitches like that.
Sat Mar 28, 2015, 11:13 AM
Mar 2015

You know me pretty well Oberliner, trust your instincts.

I'm sort of on the same side as MondoWeiss, I suppose, but I never go there except following someone else's thread, if you see, they're not really my cup of tea, I'm more of a news obsessive. Places that get to focused on some issues, too special purpose, don't get my attention, and that includes pretty much any site that solely focuses on I/P or Jewish issues.

That's what I like about DU, it's general purpose, moderated, and everything shows up here eventually.

Edit: Hey and you could thank me for the support, I didn't have to do that.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
15. I don't think you are on the same side as Mondoweiss
Sat Mar 28, 2015, 12:23 PM
Mar 2015

Unlike the writers there, I think you see human rights as universal and are not more interested in human rights violations when Israel commits them than when Hamas does as Mondoweiss confesses to being.

I think you recognize that Mondoweiss is the flip side of the same coin as sites that are only interested in Palestinian/Arab misbehavior and minimize/excuse those of Israel.

Also, I don't think you have the sort of torturous relationship with Judaism that the founder and namesake of the site has which informs his perspective on the subject.

But I could be wrong.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
17. So basically I should only listen to people like you, on the internet, who will tell me the truth?
Sat Mar 28, 2015, 03:39 PM
Mar 2015

But seriously, am I not supposed to care what anybody thinks? I just should find the one guy who knows the truth and I should only listen to him? How do you know that he's the guy?

Do you only read people because you think they have a pipeline to objectivity? That causes me to wonder whether it's worth listening to you.

 

It is Tuesday

(93 posts)
19. No. Don't listen to me.. Listen to other people..
Sat Mar 28, 2015, 03:42 PM
Mar 2015

And read all the articles, both views...

I'd trust less of Mondoweiss because it has been spitting out a lot of propaganda that has already been debunked.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»White House will go after...