Should we believe scientists,engineers and architects(over 2100 now and more coming) or anonymous propagandists from a message boaard who were no where near ground zero?
I'll go with the experts!

Another failed nut for 911 truth. Where is his Pulitzer? What did 60 minutes say? BTW, this is old junk, the lies about 911 keep repeating and fooling those who have no practical ability in engineering, fire science, and reality.

But you, you're an anonymous message board poster. Of course we should listen to you instead.
Thanks for the laugh.

Mark is a conspiracy theorist. He can't explain how 911 was done, he makes up lies about thermite. He has failed to produce any evidence for his claims.

I am not anonymous, you can find out who I am with simple research skills. The same goes for debunking 911 truth and Mark, simple research will debunk 911 truth.

I am an engineer, and a pilot who flew heavy jets. No big deal. I was an instructor pilot in the USAF, and got my masters degree in engineering in the USAF. I was trained to investigate aircraft accidents, and served as board president on accidents in the USAF. I have been shot at by Saddam's SCUDs, one blew out my windows in my office we used for our flight operations in Saudi Arabia.

Go ahead, believe the lies of 911 truth. In their 13th year of failure. I have no respect for those who spread lies about 911, especially when they are based on ignorance. 911 truth followers are faith based believers in claims that are not backed with evidence.

911 truth is easy to belong to; stop thinking for yourself and let 911 truth googled claims do the thinking.

19 terrorists did 911, all by themselves pretending to be students, and learning to fly, stuff young people do all over the world. 911 truth apologizes for 19 murderers by making up far fetched lies. The 19 terrorists are laughing, like the gif you keep posting on how silly Americans are believing lies about an act they did. I thought the 19 terrorists had to be the most gullible people in the world until I figured out there were people falling for the lies and the fake 911 truth movement based on ignorance, hate, and fantasy. I can see people like the Boston bombers falling for the dumbed lies of 911 truth, but average people, or people who think they are smart falling for 911 truth claims, hard to understand why people can't figure out 911 truth is 911 LIES.

Where is your evidence to support this super credential guy Mark? I graduated with honors, did Mark? Maybe the credentialed experts of Gage were at the bottom of their class, I was at the top. And I am average.

I've grown tired of you so now you can just argue with yourself if you wish. Maybe you'll still get credit I don't know.

It is hard to find evidence to support Mark's claims, it take work to research and destroy the constant Gish Gallop of 911 truth. 911 truth followers believe claims without doing the homework to check and verify. Saving so much time, being faith based followers is much easier than finding evidence to support the claims of 911 truth.

It is impossible to find evidence to support 911 truth. Did you get tired because you can't find any evidence.

Which is the false claim by Mark fooled you? Why can't you find evidence?

wow, Gage has less than 0.1 percent of all engineers supporting his claim, that leaves 99.9 percent rational engineers who are not gullible. That's good news, we expert engineers to be rational, not fantasy conspiracy theorists unable to do engineering.


10:36, Mark Basile, failed engineer on 911 issues, talks of devices using thermite. Zero devices or parts of devices found at the WTC. ironically he implies devices were used, and also talks about the red chips found, which would be painted on. Which is it, painted on thermite, or devices? Mark Basile has fantasies about 911.

Not a single piece of steel at the WTC was damaged by thermite. Zero products from thermite were found at the WTC. The paper Mark talks about, did not find thermite, they lied, and implied it looks like thermite.

Why are Marks claims only found in forums and youtube where fantasy is found? Because Mark has no evidence to support his claim, he has big talk of woo, and can't support it in the real world.

At 1:17 the failed engineer Mark Basile talks about Appendix C from the FEMA report and fails to make appoint. The FEMA study debunks melted steel. The samples corroded in fire. This seem to fool 911 truth followers who ignore the study and quote mine melted, or make up fantasy because they don't do science.
Metabunk give details on more studies and we learn the steel was exposed to temperature way below the melting point of steel and the steel corroded. 911 truth followers seem to make fun of science and ignore the corroded steel studied.

https://www.metabunk.org/threads/fema-appendix-c.3803/#post-109981
The sign of true woo, laughing at science, and being unable to refute the findings. 911 truth followers ignore scientific results and prefer youtube videos of nonsense and lies. A sing of failed education, or significant biases at work, blinding 911 truth followers to facts and evidence.

I can't believe 911 truth followers show zero skepticism for the 911 truth claims, and fail to run to real experts with the failed 911 truth claims for help in science.

911 truth has no experts, and the experts who were at ground zero, don't support the lies and delusional claims Mark Basile has.



911 truth a failed movement based on ignorance of physics, engineering, flying, reality and more.
For example, AE911T's Facebook page has 215,000 likes.
Empire State Building has 611,248 likes.
AE911T lies can't get more likes than a building, which does not spread lies. 911 truth is a joke, an anti-intellectual movement which has no evidence. 911 truth followers believe opinions are evidence, talk is evidence for 911 truth faith based followers, and 911 truth has done nothing for nearly 13 years, except lie.