tries for almost ten years to make you doubt all the many witnesses that saw, heard and were injured by explosions before and after the plane impact. Something's up! - wildbilln864

That is a lie, these guys were not injured by explosives. Why do you spread lies about 911? 13th year, and you spread lies.



Quote mining 911 statements, making up lies of explosives. This is why 911 truth fails for 13 years, and will never present evidence.

didn't want an investigation into the biggest crime against America in history?

Or why, once the 911 family members finally managed to get an investigation started, Kissinger was appointed to head the commission?

The biggest crime in history- and those in charge didn't want to investigate.

That alone should tell you something.

Slander and libel. Accusing people of lying when all they want is more information. Disgraceful. One day the whole truth will come out. Many people will all of a sudden feel the need to change usernames. But it's all recorded. For posterity.

Why do you lie - the FBI did the biggest investigation in history - you must be talking about the Congress junk, political claptrap.
Oops, you missed NIST, did an investigation, and 911 truth followers can't comprehend it - they want another investigation, but 911 truth followers are not able to understand an new investigation.
oops, FEMA did an investigation.
oops, colleges all over the USA did papers, studies and industry did proprietary studies. Wow, you missed this claim by hundreds of studies/reports/investigations and more.

Guess Google U. failed U.

911 truth only spreads lies - it is a fact, you can't take any of your 911 truth claims and prove them. Good luck, Creative Speculation should have better creativity, repeating failed lies from 2006, are not very creative; more like plagiarism.

That alone should tell you something. - nationalize the fed

It tells me 911 truth believers and followers don't do research, they use Google and blindly repeat debunked lies.

There you go again with your baseless assumptions.

I DID NOT "miss NIST". You apparently did, because you repeatedly state that "Many buildings have been totaled by fires" and fail to provide examples.

NIST says:

"The collapse of WTC7 represents the first known instance of the total collapse of a tall building primarily due to fires"

http://www.nist.gov/customcf/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=861610

More and more everyday, super. Accept it. We'll have a new investigation. It's a matter of when.

This is why laypeople don't belong in a serious discussion of the 9/11 collapses. It should be left to building professionals.

To keep any investigation from taking place. Finally after 2 years, the commission was formed. Bush and Cheney only testified In Private, not under oath, with no recording allowed. This is a FACT.
If that's not a clue, you are truly clueless.

... which was immediately after the plane hit. And then, an hour later, the building collapsed. Up where plane hit, not from the lobby. Dozens of videos, and not a one of them sounded remotely like a controlled demolition; nothing like what the guy at 48 mins claimed, either heard or seen on any of them.

But I'll gladly answer your question right after you answer this one: Why do you think intellectually dishonest horseshit like this video ought to go unchallenged on DU? Why do you encourage a proven huckster and fraud like Rob Balsamo to "hang in there" polluting DU with nonsense for sale?

Wrong! Speculation doesn't help you William.

was close enough to hear them. Unfortunately the cameras were not!

Last edited Wed Jun 25, 2014, 01:24 AM - Edit history (1)

"they" -

"they don't do this on other websites to defend democratic policies. They don't jump in threads to defend any other topics. Their only actions here are to denigrate those of us who want a real and full investigation of 911 and the perpetrators. No where else do they spend so much time and effort. Why is that." - wildbilln864.

No one saw explosives, no one was injured by explosives. A fact quote mining can't change.

The full investigation into 911 is complete, 19 terrorists did 911 with four aircraft. Talk of explosives, are wild unsupported lies - why? there is no evidence for explosives on 911. Only 4 planes, 19 terrorists.

Lack of knowledge of the many investigations does not merit a new investigation. There were no bombs in the WTC, that is a failed fantasy.

Which topic needs defending? Why do people spread lies recycled from 911 truth, a failed movement.

19 terrorists, 4 planes, no explosives, no thermite, now what -

"tries for almost ten years to make you doubt all the many witnesses that saw, heard and were injured by explosions before and after the plane impact. Around the clock & every day. Something's up! Listen to the witness at 48 minutes in." - wildbilln864

... what is the around the clock stuff? sounds paranoid

Repeating failed claims will not help after 13 years.
Why does 911 truth quote mine witnesses out of context? No one died from blast effects.? Why zero blast damage to 911 steel? - 911 truth has hearsay, thinks it is evidence, failed to make a point.