Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Philosopher

(895 posts)
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 03:01 PM Apr 2012

DADT: Discharge Papers Still Invite Roadblocks, Discrimination

from The Advocate

Three senators are asking the Department of Defense to expedite the process for veterans seeking alterations to their discharge documents, omitting information that they were discharged for being gay.

According to the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, many veterans discharged under DADT face roadblocks when applying for certain benefits. A discharge from the military for sexual orientation can also be a barrier to employment and requires veterans to 'out' themselves to future employers, says SLDN executive director Aubrey Sarvis.

Senators Kirsten Gillibrand of New York, Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, and Mark Udall of Colorado, issued a joint letter to Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, asking the department to deliver on a promise made to help discharged veterans in tandem with the repeal of "don't ask, don't tell."

"Veterans that were discharged under DADT served our country courageously and with dignity and we need to give them the appropriate recognition immediately," Gillibrand said in a statement Wednesday.


Click Here To Read More


2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DADT: Discharge Papers Still Invite Roadblocks, Discrimination (Original Post) The Philosopher Apr 2012 OP
Du rec. Nt xchrom Apr 2012 #1
Change it to "convenience of the government." MADem Apr 2012 #2

MADem

(135,425 posts)
2. Change it to "convenience of the government."
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 03:21 PM
Apr 2012

That can cover ANYTHING, and it is commonly used during drawdowns, force restructurings, base closures, those old-timey pregnancy discharges, and a host of other reasons, like not wanting to spend money transferring a servicemember for a short tour when their replacement was already onboard and they were in excess.

They need to re-issue the 214, too, not issue a 215 (correction). Could that be what is holding this all up, I wonder? A "Hermes the Bureaucrat" conundrum at the Pentagon?

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»LGBT»DADT: Discharge Papers St...