LGBT
Related: About this forumPlease check out this post in H & M about a homophobic juror.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/124087062Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Proclaiming one's own lifelong dislike of any group isn't necessarily antagonistic to that group. Some of us would see it as a confession of a weakness.
HillWilliam
(3,310 posts)I'm convinced it is possible to review the logs from jury service and figure out who juror #4 is. The question is will the admins bother?
That response is about forty-leven levels of wrong.
Pab Sungenis
(9,612 posts)and is continuing to justify his statements in that thread.
mitchtv
(17,718 posts)and new ones everyday, fresh outa the eggs they hatched from. (Trolls are hatched aren't they?)
Behind the Aegis
(53,987 posts)HillWilliam
(3,310 posts)because it certainly seems to me that a certain juror is awfully close to or stepping over the line at TOS.
They bett' not pull that shit in this group. 'S'all I got to say.
pinto
(106,886 posts)but the result and individual votes have been sent for review.
Because jurors are anonymous to one another doesn't mean they're anonymous to the admins. Two of those jurors need a come-ta-jeebus meeting.
Call Me Wesley
(38,187 posts)obviously has no clue how it works: "I agree that the posters is a homophobic troll. IMO the post should stay and the poster get a granite pizza." So she/he thought - IMO - that if the post stands, admins will catch up on it and deliver the pizza.
Juror no. 4, though, should be PPR'd no matter what.
DURHAM D
(32,611 posts)It is time to gather in H & M.
Edit: Notorious Juror # 4 is Jim Lane.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Yeesh!
DURHAM D
(32,611 posts)if you have not already done so.
Pab Sungenis
(9,612 posts)Too many homophobes around here nowadays.