LGBT
Related: About this forumWere Democrats Right to Block Gay Nominee to N.J. Court?
Were Democrats Right to Block Gay Nominee to N.J. Court?
A gay nominee to the New Jersey Supreme Court was blocked today after promising to recuse himself from an upcoming case on same-sex marriage.
It was Democrats in the Senate Judiciary Committee who led the 7-6 vote against putting Chatham Borough mayor Bruce Harris on the bench.
Harris would have added the voice of a Republican an important requirement for Gov. Chris Christie and of a black man who is gay to an all-white court. But Democrats complained that Harris admitted not having real courtroom experience and that he pledged to recuse himself from a case about same-sex marriage should it reach the state Supreme Court.
http://www.advocate.com/society/law/2012/05/31/gay-judge-blocked-new-jersey-supreme-court
monmouth
(21,078 posts)head and is not prepared for the job. Yes, Democrats were right to block him from the Court.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)how can that even happen?
mitchtv
(17,718 posts)"Judas Goat", I think can describe him. What good is a gay voice if he recuses himself, straits don't?
Vanje
(9,766 posts)I'm still not able to believe in Log Cabin Republicans.
Oh sure, Theoretically they COULD exist , like Bigfoot, or Loch Ness monster.
But....
beyurslf
(6,755 posts)shows that he is not qualified. Would he recuse himself from a hearing on black equality? Or on male equality? Or on republican equality?
Vanje
(9,766 posts)from cases involving opposite gender marriages?