Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WillParkinson

(16,862 posts)
Fri Jun 1, 2012, 10:47 AM Jun 2012

Were Democrats Right to Block Gay Nominee to N.J. Court?

Were Democrats Right to Block Gay Nominee to N.J. Court?

A gay nominee to the New Jersey Supreme Court was blocked today after promising to recuse himself from an upcoming case on same-sex marriage.

It was Democrats in the Senate Judiciary Committee who led the 7-6 vote against putting Chatham Borough mayor Bruce Harris on the bench.

Harris would have added the voice of a Republican — an important requirement for Gov. Chris Christie — and of a black man who is gay to an all-white court. But Democrats complained that Harris admitted not having real courtroom experience and that he pledged to recuse himself from a case about same-sex marriage should it reach the state Supreme Court.

http://www.advocate.com/society/law/2012/05/31/gay-judge-blocked-new-jersey-supreme-court

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Were Democrats Right to Block Gay Nominee to N.J. Court? (Original Post) WillParkinson Jun 2012 OP
It is irrelevant that Harris is gay. That had nothing to do with the fact he would be in over his monmouth Jun 2012 #1
a black gay man is a republican? La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2012 #2
there is a term mitchtv Jun 2012 #3
Ha! Vanje Jun 2012 #6
The faact that he said he would recuse himself from a equality issue before the court beyurslf Jun 2012 #4
Are straight judges expected to recuse themselves Vanje Jun 2012 #5
+1000! Fearless Jun 2012 #7
I think they made the right move considering his lack of experience and naivete.... Rowdyboy Jun 2012 #8
Democrats were right to block a Republican. n/t Fearless Jun 2012 #9

monmouth

(21,078 posts)
1. It is irrelevant that Harris is gay. That had nothing to do with the fact he would be in over his
Fri Jun 1, 2012, 11:14 AM
Jun 2012

head and is not prepared for the job. Yes, Democrats were right to block him from the Court.

mitchtv

(17,718 posts)
3. there is a term
Fri Jun 1, 2012, 02:10 PM
Jun 2012

"Judas Goat", I think can describe him. What good is a gay voice if he recuses himself, straits don't?

Vanje

(9,766 posts)
6. Ha!
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 05:31 PM
Jun 2012

I'm still not able to believe in Log Cabin Republicans.
Oh sure, Theoretically they COULD exist , like Bigfoot, or Loch Ness monster.

But....

beyurslf

(6,755 posts)
4. The faact that he said he would recuse himself from a equality issue before the court
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 05:25 PM
Jun 2012

shows that he is not qualified. Would he recuse himself from a hearing on black equality? Or on male equality? Or on republican equality?

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»LGBT»Were Democrats Right to B...