Nope...not even a little.

Someone else posted about keeping your mouth shuts until after the election...sarcastically, of course...but there's a lot of that out there at GD right now.

nt

A person's sexuality has no bearing on their professional life so why raise it?

Using the word "agenda" does not always mean "the Gay agenda" and in this case I read it as complaining about the OP's personal agenda.

Stop seeing prejudice where there is none; your best response would have been to have quietly pointed out, in thread or by PM, that the word could be misunderstood. It was not worthy of an alert as the jury quite rightly found.

Thanks for imparting your "wisdom" so we know what to see and stay in our places.

to tell us all about ourselves.
I told dsc to stay away from that plqce

with not substantial post counts.

, out of respect for HIS wishes of course, is typical of the lingering homophobia at the heart of many heterosexual progressives/liberals.

Out of respect for HIS wishes, of course.

It wasn't disagreeing with him, it was yelling at him...because they're all so understanding, dontcha know!

That's why I thought I'd spread a little love for dsc here, where the homophobes have to tread a little more lightly.

At this point it just needs to drop and go away...

Yeah, that alcoholism thing was especially bad.

anti blasphmy laws internationally. That means here. That means they come to say the First Amendment needs limits, but if you ask them about religious figures who speak hate against gays, they will not respond. They want it to be illegal to criticize religion, but they want religion free to call others every name in the book, for their gods or idols or egos....
They want a law which would protect Fred Phelps from us, but not us from him.

absolutely

" Is it totally necessary to know who he preferred having sex with in order to care about that?"

Amazing.

who love to laugh about some wingnuts being gay . you know the "is karl rove gay" type stuff ?