Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 10:25 AM Jun 2013

American Bar Association may ban ‘gay panic’ defense -

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/06/12/american-bar-association-may-ban-gay-panic-defense/



A proposal coming before the American Bar Association’s Criminal Justice Section would permanently render the so-called “gay panic” defense inadmissible in court. According to the dot429 blog, if the proposal is ratified, it will ban defense attorneys from using the sexual orientation or gender identity of a victim against them in court.

Too often, according to dot429, attorneys representing perpetrators of violent acts against LGBT people resort to accusing the victims of “bringing it on themselves” in order to defend their clients in court. The “gay panic” defense says that an LGBT brought violent retribution on themselves, up to and including murder, by sexually propositioning someone who was so enraged by the gesture that they had no choice but to react violently.

It was invoked, unsuccessfully in the trail of the murderers of Matthew Shepard and Gwen Araujo. The term “gay panic” was first used by psychiatrist Edward J. Kempf in his 1920 book Psychopathology, in which he described it as “a distinct stage in the psychoses.” However, it is rarely used in modern courts since no one has able to verify its existence as a genuine psychiatric phenomenon.

As dot439 pointed out, “If merely being sexually propositioned was a legally acceptable reason for killing someone, countless thousands of heterosexual men would be at severe risk for being murdered by women they made a pass at.”

- See more at: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/06/12/american-bar-association-may-ban-gay-panic-defense/#sthash.HyjceFVe.dpuf
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
American Bar Association may ban ‘gay panic’ defense - (Original Post) xchrom Jun 2013 OP
Misleading headline -- the ABA can't "ban" anything Jim Lane Jun 2013 #1
"countless thousands of heterosexual men would be at severe risk" NCLefty Jun 2013 #2
Why isn't there a "fundie panic" defense? Religious conservatives have murdered, maimed, and Zorra Jun 2013 #3
 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
1. Misleading headline -- the ABA can't "ban" anything
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 11:34 PM
Jun 2013

The ABA isn't a unit of government. It's a private organization to which many (but far from all) lawyers belong.

As the linked article states, the actual resolution before the ABA is one "“urging governments to take legislative action to curtail the availability and effectiveness of the ‘gay panic’ and ‘trans panic’ defenses...."

If the ABA really wanted to be helpful, they could appoint a committee to draft specific model legislation. There are instances in court proceedings where someone's sexual orientation is relevant, so you couldn't just enact a blanket prohibition on any mention of the topic.

NCLefty

(3,678 posts)
2. "countless thousands of heterosexual men would be at severe risk"
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 05:52 PM
Jun 2013

Uhhh, you mean countless hundreds of millions.

At least.

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
3. Why isn't there a "fundie panic" defense? Religious conservatives have murdered, maimed, and
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 10:20 PM
Jun 2013

tortured millions of innocent people throughout history.

Fundies scare the heck out of me, they hate me for being LGBT, and so many of them are obviously deluded, deranged, and often violent.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»LGBT»American Bar Association ...