Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RetiredTrotskyite

(1,507 posts)
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 11:16 PM Feb 2014

Anti-LGBT Discrimination on Religious Ground to Be Voted On in Oregon

Last edited Mon Feb 3, 2014, 01:19 AM - Edit history (1)

Needless to say, this is extremely concerning.

Reuters) - Oregon voters will likely face two questions about gay marriage when they go to the ballot this year: whether to become the 18th state to let same-sex couples wed, and whether the state should be the first to allow florists, cake makers and others to refuse to participate in these weddings on religious grounds.

The ballot initiatives set up what some activists have said is the next frontier in the marriage debate - as more states move to extend marriage rights to same-sex couples, those who object on religious grounds want a legal right to opt out.

"This is not a sideshow issue," said James Esseks of the American Civil Liberties Union, referring to the Oregon ballot initiative and the coming debate over religious exemption. "This is going to be the issue that we fight about for the next ten years, at least, in the (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender) rights movement."


[link:http://news.yahoo.com/gay-marriage-debate-takes-twist-oregon-religious-exemption-121608059.html|


Note: The second proposition will to, if passed, permit business owners to discriminate AGAINST LGBT people on grounds of religious belief.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anti-LGBT Discrimination on Religious Ground to Be Voted On in Oregon (Original Post) RetiredTrotskyite Feb 2014 OP
It's got to be humiliating in other states Warpy Feb 2014 #1
Here is the reaction of Oregon United for Marriage ... DreamGypsy Feb 2014 #2
I know, I know Warpy Feb 2014 #3
So, OR now joins SD, AZ, and ID in this mad rush to codify discrimination into law. blkmusclmachine Feb 2014 #4
Yup. RetiredTrotskyite Feb 2014 #5
Fair enough.. IF they apply it equally that is. Amimnoch Feb 2014 #6
I have been a "lurker" on this forum for a couple of weeks and this subject made me Beachwood Feb 2014 #7
Honestly? Plantaganet Feb 2014 #8

Warpy

(111,292 posts)
1. It's got to be humiliating in other states
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 11:24 PM
Feb 2014

that they're lagging behind Utah in recognizing the legal basis for marriage equality.

DreamGypsy

(2,252 posts)
2. Here is the reaction of Oregon United for Marriage ...
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 12:11 AM
Feb 2014

... to the current situation in Utah: Utah and Oregon (Posted on January 8, 2014)

Heartbreaking news out of Utah this morning — the Governor’s office announced that “state recognition of same-sex marital status is ON HOLD until further notice.” The announcement comes on the heels of the January 6 order from the United States Supreme Court blocking same-sex marriages there while state officials appeal a federal judge’s Dec 20 decision that struck down their constitutional ban on marriage for same-sex couples.

The result? Utah’s loving and committed same-sex couples are in legal limbo. Hundreds of couples married during the short window when they are able to, but it’s unclear if their marriages will remain valid. And for couples who didn’t have a chance to marry, they are once again excluded from the freedom to marry the person they love.

Oregon United for Marriage is working to give Oregonians the chance to vote on November 4 to affirm the freedom to marry in our state’s constitution—the most certain way to make sure every Oregonian has the basic freedom to marry the person they love.

There are also lawsuits pending in federal court here, but the timeline to a resolution of those cases is unknown. As we’re seeing in Utah, legal cases are full of twists and turns.

Even if a court finds Oregon’s Measure 36 unconstitutional before November 4, the discriminatory language that excludes same-sex couples from marriage will still be in Oregon’s constitution—until Oregonians vote to remove it.

The dual strategy to pursue the freedom to marry at the ballot and through the courts puts us in a strong position to win this year—and win in a way that a higher court or legal memo can’t undo or put into limbo.

To win at the ballot on November 4, we must continue our focused work to build the largest coalition Oregon has ever seen, to train volunteers in every corner in the state, and to secure the resources we’ll need to ensure that same-sex couples—who work hard and pay into the same system as everyone else—will have the same freedom to marry that other couples have.


No humiliation here. We're continuing to fight the battle for equality on all fronts.

As for the recent lawsuits and the proposed ballot initiative determining "whether the state should be the first to allow florists, cake makers and others to refuse to participate in these weddings on religious grounds", I am confident that Oregonians will assert there is no constitutional protection of bigotry.


Warpy

(111,292 posts)
3. I know, I know
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 01:00 AM
Feb 2014

but people who want resort weddings surrounded by beautiful scenery can come here to NM. Marriage equality, which began on a city by city basis in August, is statewide after it was all met with a yawn. I'm really proud of the more conservative people here who realized this wasn't worth fighting, that equality will contribute more to social stability than keeping it unfree and unequal would. We went statewide a day before the Utah ruling came down. I know there are a few sore losers in the lege, but I don't think they'll get too far.

NM is an intensely weird state, which is why they tolerate me.

 

Amimnoch

(4,558 posts)
6. Fair enough.. IF they apply it equally that is.
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 02:55 PM
Feb 2014

Okay, so they want to protect the first amendment right to religious freedom. I can get behind that.

Since it seems to be primarily Christians that are behind this movement, i can support cake makers, and others to be able to restrict business based on their religious beliefs.. but as a Christian it must also be demanded that they don't choose and pick which parts of their religion that they enforce, otherwise they should be completely open to legal prosecution as it is then Bigotry. So, any business that wishes to operate their business based on Christian doctrine should also be required to:

May not provide services to any customer who has been previously married, as it says in Corinthians 7:27 "Are you bound to a wife? Do not seek to be released. Are you released from a wife? Do not seek a wife", So, they may only provide services to those who are being married for the first time.. period. This is especially true of any customer who is a divorced female, because as it says in Matthew 5:32 "Whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery."

May not provide services to any customer that plans on wearing make-up, jewelry, or have their hair done for their wedding (or when they come in to solicit services. As it says in Peter 3:3 "You should not use outward aids to make yourselves beautiful, such as the way you fix your hair, or the jewelry you put on, or the dresses you wear."

As a few examples above, if piety is the true reason for denial of service, then these same vender's will not have issue with keeping to their faith and apply it equally in all areas of sin. Anything less is bigotry, and worthy of no religion based protection status.

 

Beachwood

(106 posts)
7. I have been a "lurker" on this forum for a couple of weeks and this subject made me
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 03:16 PM
Feb 2014

Start to post on DU.

I have watched and read some of DU for a couple of years. I never bothered to join because I had nothing more to say than what I could read.

But this "religion" as justification for bigotry, justification for being inhumane to other folks on this planet, where would this end?


I also "lurk" on a couple of other threads and watch others.

May I, as a "freshman" poster here make one request? (Ignore it if you think it's a stupid idea or that I have not really earned a right so early to make a suggestion.)

PLEASE Post this on the religion thread. They seem to think over there that it's perfectly alright to hold religious beliefs and do no harm to Americans.

I will just add; I grew up in a Bible believer family where the Bible was the word of "God"....I learned at about 15-16 that being gay meant I wasn't part of that world. Being gay has a lot to teach America and the world, all about prejudice and bigotry, and the re-inforcement that Christianity, (and, yes some Judaic and Islamist sects) give to bigots.

Where are the religions that stand up to this nonsense and strike it down? I fail to see any bothering to stand up.

I'm so sickened by the thought that people can actually parade around their religious beliefs as a justification for bigotry.

Can we get this discussion going on another forum that is not about our own LGBT issues? This is crazy stuff parading as "religion", as it has been since the Salem witch trials and since slaves were okay with the Romans.

Plantaganet

(241 posts)
8. Honestly?
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 08:21 PM
Feb 2014

It wouldn't be worth the effort to post in Religion. Just read some of the threads. Religion is never responsible for anything bad... certainly not homophobia.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»LGBT»Anti-LGBT Discrimination ...