Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 02:22 PM Feb 2014

It’s Over: Gay Marriage Can’t Lose in the Courts

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2014/02/virginia_s_gay_marriage_ban_ruled_unconstitutional_a_perfect_record_for.single.html

This hasn’t all been about marriage. Twelve decisions have addressed a substantive aspect of marriage equality since Windsor, and equality has won in all 12—with the Virginia decision now joining decisions from Kentucky, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah, and West Virginia, and two decisions each in Illinois, New Jersey, and Ohio. But six other cases since Windsor have addressed different aspects of discrimination based on sexual orientation, such as discrimination on juries and employment benefits, and the side of equality has won in all six of those cases as well.

The tally is even starker when you look at the number of judges who have considered the issue. Since Windsor, in these 18 decisions, 32 different judges have considered whether Windsor is merely about the relationship between the state and federal governments or whether it is about equality. And all 32 of them have found for equality. In other words, 32 accomplished, intelligent lawyers, appointed by Democrats and Republicans, whose job it is to read precedent, have ruled for equality. Not a single one has disagreed.

********************

So these are all "activist judges"? Appointed by Democrats and Republicans alike? 100% of them are somehow radical gay activists... lol
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It’s Over: Gay Marriage Can’t Lose in the Courts (Original Post) MNBrewer Feb 2014 OP
I suspect that judges have the same reasons that truedelphi Feb 2014 #1
Or it's just the right thing to do. MNBrewer Feb 2014 #2
Yes but it has been the right thing to do truedelphi Feb 2014 #6
Or they see it as a simple extention of the 'equal protection' clause of the 14th Amendment... Rhythm Feb 2014 #3
Becuase it is. Fearless Feb 2014 #4
Indeed Rhythm Feb 2014 #5

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
1. I suspect that judges have the same reasons that
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 06:25 PM
Feb 2014

Other Americans have for deciding in favor of ending marriage restrictions.

And those reasons would be:

That they themselves are gay, or that some of their close family members and friends may be.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
6. Yes but it has been the right thing to do
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 05:27 PM
Feb 2014

Since the beginning of time. However the right for anyone in the LGBT to marry was certainly not going to be established back when most people were part of a congregation of conservative Churches. (Such as the Protestant and Catholic Churches were in the 19th Century.)

I see this right as being established not simply because it is the right thing to do, but also as something that occurred due to so many people coming out of the closet and letting people know that members of the LGBT crowd are normal everyday people. (Or at least as "normal" as anyone in this screwed up society can be.)

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»LGBT»It’s Over: Gay Marriage C...