LGBT
Related: About this forumSome LGBT groups not on board with the Equality Act
http://www.washingtonblade.com/2015/07/21/some-lgbt-advocates-not-on-board-with-equality-act/For starters, whether LCCHR itself will support the legislation is unclear. Even prior to the announced plan to introduce the bill, sources have told the Washington Blade amending the Civil Rights Act to include LGBT protections makes some longtime civil rights advocates uneasy because it potentially opens the historic law up to harmful amendments.
Although LCCHR has supported iterations of ENDA in the past, the organization didnt respond to the Washington Blades request for comment on whether the organization will support the Equality Act upon its introduction.
Wade Henderson, president of the LCCHR, is quoted in a Wall Street Journal article earlier this month as expressing concern about the bill.
Some are concerned about opening up arguably the most important statute Congress has ever enacted for the issue of racial discrimination, Henderson said.
Heather Cronk, co-director of the LGBT grassroots group GetEQUAL, has previously objected to the idea of amending the Civil Rights Act to enact LGBT non-discrimination protections and told the Blade on Tuesday shes not sure if her organization would be able to support the Equality Act.
- See more at: http://www.washingtonblade.com/2015/07/21/some-lgbt-advocates-not-on-board-with-equality-act/#sthash.b8BcmPlf.dpuf
end of quote
Now for my take I think that amending the Civil Rights Act is the only way to go. Any stand alone law would wind up being weaker due to religious exemptions that already exist (see Hobby Lobby). The religious exemption of the Civil Rights Act is way narrower and has survived SCOTUS scrutiny. The EEOC has already taken the position that LGBT are covered for employment by the Civil Rights Act we would just be cementing that and applying it to housing and public accommodations. I under stand the fear of amendments which means we need to be willing to jettison the law if a sufficiently bad amendment is added.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)place. She does not seem to support non discrimination law in any form it is suggested. I do not get her thought process, no to ENDA, no to the Equality Act, which is of course not only more comprehensive than ENDA but also an older legislation, having first been introduced in 1974 by Bella Abzug and Ed Koch.
I see Log Cabin is among the 'some groups' that take issue with Equality. 40 years the Equality Act has been voted down.
dsc
(52,166 posts)which is why we need to be iron clad about not accepting potentially poisonous amendments, but that is not a reason not to amend it to add LGBT.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)non inclusive ENDA. But we also have to at some point trust that we can legislate or we can't do anything. It's just such an endless debacle.
DemocraticWing
(1,290 posts)I'll give deference to the significance of the ACA, but this is definitely up there. It should be a significant priority for President Obama, all Democrats in Congress, and all candidates for our Presidential nomination. If a candidate does not support the Equality Act, I will not vote for them in either the primary or the general election.