Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

niyad

(113,306 posts)
Tue Jun 16, 2015, 09:31 PM Jun 2015

Supreme Court Refuses to Hear North Carolina Forced Ultrasound Law (gynoticians lose one!)


Supreme Court Refuses to Hear North Carolina Forced Ultrasound Law

The Supreme Court refused to review a North Carolina mandatory ultrasound law this week, permanently blocking what many feel is the most extreme forced ultrasound law in the nation.
The North Carolina law, which was passed in 2011, requires a physician perform an ultrasound on a patient seeking an abortion at least four house, and no more than 72 hours before the abortion. Also under the law, the physician must display imaging from the ultrasound and describe it to the patient, even if she objects, and even if she covers her eyes and ears, which the law permits.

This law was preliminarily blocked in October 2011 after several North Carolina physicians, medical practices, and organizations including the American Civil Liberties Untion (ALCU) and the Center for Reproductive Rights, filed a lawsuit. A federal court then struck down the law in 2014, when U.S. District Court Judge Catherine C. Eagles ruled that the “speech-and-display” provision of the law violated the First Amendment, and acknowledging that the ultrasound law was designed to persuade women not to obtain abortions. In December of last year, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously upheld this decision.

The Fourth Circuit Court wrote that the law violates doctors’ First Amendment right, and threatens patient well-being, writing:
“[The patient] must endure the embarrassing spectacle of averting her eyes and covering her ears while her physician–a person to whom she should be encouraged to listen–recites information to her. We can perceive no benefit to state interests from walling off patients and physicians in a manner antithetical to the very communication that lies at the heart of the informed consent process.”
. . . . . .


“Women are fully capable of making thoughtful decisions about their families, future, and health without interference from politicians who presume to know better. And all doctors must be free to give patients their best medical judgment, free from talking points dictated by lawmakers advancing an agenda,” said Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights.

http://feminist.org/blog/index.php/2015/06/16/supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-north-carolina-forced-ultrasound-law/
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Women's Rights & Issues»Supreme Court Refuses to ...