Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Women's Rights & Issues
Related: About this forumScience’s Gender Gap is Worse Than You Thought
Sciences Gender Gap is Worse Than You Thought
Female mice experience pain differently than male mice, according to a study published last week in the scientific journal Nature Neuroscience. That means pain medication that works on a male mouse might not work for a human woman, researchers say.
Those findings might seem trivial to people who dont spend their days wearing white lab coats, but the study highlights a larger, oft-overlooked issue in scientific research: Malesboth animal and humanare regularly used as proxies for females, furthering the assumption that the female experience of biological phenomena is always the same as the males. Yet from heart attacks to multiple sclerosis (MS), this assumption has proven untrue. And it has potentially dire consequences.
In many disciplines, the animals used to study diseases and drugs are overwhelmingly male, wrote The New York Times editorial board in an op-ed published Saturday, which may significantly reduce the reliability of research and lead to drugs that wont work in half the population.
. . . .
Eight out of 10 biological disciplines have a bias towards using male animals, a 2010 study found. For example, neuroscience used 5.5 male animals to every one female, while pharmacologys 5 to 1 animal ratio was not much better. (This bias may be especially dangerous, NIH executives pointed out in a Nature editorial, because women tend to experience more adverse drug reactions than men.) Moreover, the same study discovered that 75 percent of studies in three highly regarded immunology journals did not disclose their animal subjects sex at all.
Scientists frequently explain the dearth of female animals in basic and preclinical research by insisting that females are more complex and variable than male animals, since they undergo an estrous cycle (called a menstrual cycle in humans). They claim that female test subjects hormonal variability can disrupt experiments and hinder scientists ability to make conclusions. However, a 2014 meta-analysis of academic articles on neuroscience and biomedical research found that females are no more variable than males.
. . . .
http://msmagazine.com/blog/2015/07/28/sciences-gender-gap-is-worse-than-you-thought/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1110 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Science’s Gender Gap is Worse Than You Thought (Original Post)
niyad
Jul 2015
OP
Novara
(5,843 posts)1. Typical, isn't it? Even male mice are more important than female mice.
niyad
(113,336 posts)2. females don't count anywhere to these cretins. I wonder if it ever occurs to them exactly how
they got here, or if that is the basis for their hatred.