Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 09:37 AM Mar 2012

Prostate Cancer Therapy Too Good to Be True Explodes Health Cost

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-03-26/prostate-cancer-therapy-too-good-to-be-true-explodes-health-cost.html

Imagine a prostate cancer therapy that has almost no side effects. Hospitals say it exists and they’re vying to be among the first to offer it. Too bad the treatment may not work as well as advertised and could boost America’s already spiraling health-care costs.

The technology uses narrowly focused proton beams to deliver precisely targeted blasts of radiation. The particle beams are delivered by 500-ton machines in facilities that cost from $100 million to $200 million, and can require a football- field sized building to house. A typical treatment costs about $50,000, twice as much as traditional radiation therapy though it is usually covered by Medicare or private insurance.

For U.S. taxpayers and employers facing spiraling health- care costs, that’s a worry.

“Proton-beam therapy is like the death star of American medical technology; nothing so big and complicated has ever been confronted by the system,” said Amitabh Chandra, a health economist at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government. “It’s a metaphor for all the problems we have in American medicine.”
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Prostate Cancer Therapy Too Good to Be True Explodes Health Cost (Original Post) xchrom Mar 2012 OP
Maybe we've been looking at healthcare all wrong. Turbineguy Mar 2012 #1
If only someone had declared a "War on Cancer"... PoliticAverse Mar 2012 #4
I find your lack of faith disturbing. Ian David Mar 2012 #2
Seems to me that a few years back, it was MRI machines hedgehog Mar 2012 #3

Turbineguy

(37,372 posts)
1. Maybe we've been looking at healthcare all wrong.
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 09:41 AM
Mar 2012

the Defense Department should do it. Then these costs would fit right in. Instead of building an aircraft carrier they could get 30 of these machines.

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
3. Seems to me that a few years back, it was MRI machines
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 10:30 AM
Mar 2012

that were going to bankrupt us!

The article indicates that this therapy is not proven to be an improvement over existing radiation treatment in all cases of prostate cancer. However:

" That’s a major benefit for the relatively small number of people who suffer from tumors of the spine, brain and eyes, where stray radiation may blind or paralyze, or in children who are more sensitive to radiation."

I expect to see these machines used for other cancers where damage to adjacent tissues has long been an accepted side effect.


Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Health»Prostate Cancer Therapy T...