Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 05:48 PM Apr 2012

Why We Shouldn’t Prescribe Hormonal Contraception to 12 Year Olds

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/context-and-variation/2012/04/27/why-we-shouldnt-prescribe-hormonal-contraception-to-12-year-olds/

Variation in adolescent menstrual cycles, doctor-patient relationships, and why we shouldn’t prescribe hormonal contraceptives to twelve year olds

The United States has the highest rate of unintended teen pregnancy among industrialized nations. So I can understand why there are so many papers, and such a great effort, to get young girls on hormonal contraception (Clark et al. 2004; Clark 2001; Gerschultz et al. 2007; Gupta et al. 2008; Krishnamoorthy et al. 2008; Ott et al. 2002; Roye 1998; Roye and Seals 2001; Sayegh et al. 2006; Zibners et al. 1999).

But I’ve noticed two things: first, that hormonal contraception is used imperfectly in this population, with some estimates that 10-15% of adolescents on hormonal contraception still get pregnant (Gupta et al. 2008). Second, discontinuation rates for hormonal contraception in young girls are high, with many girls complaining about side effects, particularly breakthrough bleeding (Clark et al. 2004; Gupta et al. 2008; Zibners et al. 1999). I have to admit some concern over the fact that many of the papers I read that mentioned these discontinuation rates and side effects were almost condescending in their tone. The implication was that the side effects weren’t a big deal.

One of the ways clinicians and sexual health educators are trying to improve hormonal contraceptive use in adolescents is to emphasize their off-label use as a “regulator” – that is, the pill can regulate your cycle, regulate your mood, regulate your skin. The idea is to emphasize the positive effects of hormonal contraception to combat the side effects young girls both worry about, and actually experience. This also tends to produce campaigns and commercials with images of idealized young women that young girls would want to model themselves after – skinny, confident, and of course very feminine.

This is not my favorite idea. The pill should not regulate the cycles of adolescent girls who experience moderate variation in their cycles, which, as it turns out, is what characterizes the normal adolescent menstrual cycle. (This is independent from debilitating, pathological experiences of the menstrual cycle or menstrual bleeding, which occur in a very small percentage of women.)



*** i don't know how i feel about this -- there were girls who were definitely sexually active by 13 in my family. hell, i was
we were - still are -- white middle class folks -- children at that young age would have been disastrous and 1 young lady made a marriage too young to a male unsuited for fatherhood.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why We Shouldn’t Prescribe Hormonal Contraception to 12 Year Olds (Original Post) xchrom Apr 2012 OP
Young women have been taking them for non-contraceptive reasons for decades HockeyMom Apr 2012 #1
The pregnancy rate is higher- digonswine Apr 2012 #2
It might be in girls who aren't taught effectively Warpy Apr 2012 #3
 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
1. Young women have been taking them for non-contraceptive reasons for decades
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 05:54 PM
Apr 2012

I did as a 12 year old in 1960. If I didn't, it would have meant a D & C, blood transfusions, etc., and a LOT of missed school. That is BETTER? I am 63 years old and still here. In total I must have taken hormonal contraception for a good 15 years. In those years, it was the high dosage pills that I took.

They are full of BS, and have an agenda, if they tell you otherwise. Me, and countless other women my age, are living proof of that.

digonswine

(1,485 posts)
2. The pregnancy rate is higher-
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 06:52 PM
Apr 2012

for those actually taking birth control?? Is this true, because it makes no sense?

Warpy

(111,317 posts)
3. It might be in girls who aren't taught effectively
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 10:12 PM
Apr 2012

and think they only need to take a pill after they've had sex. I'm afraid that might be the case in a lot of very young girl children whose parents won't dole them out with the Flintstones vitamin every morning at breakfast.

Depo provera shots or hormonal implants might serve this population better. I worry less about the consequences of hormonal birth control in high risk girl children than I do about what a pregnancy would do to an 11 year old body, and yes, some girls do start being very active at 11.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Health»Why We Shouldn’t Prescrib...