Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celebration

(15,812 posts)
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 01:03 PM Jul 2012

In Vast Effort, F.D.A. Spied on E-Mails of Its Own Scientists

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/15/us/fda-surveillance-of-scientists-spread-to-outside-critics.html?_r=2

Moving to quell what one memorandum called the “collaboration” of the F.D.A.’s opponents, the surveillance operation identified 21 agency employees, Congressional officials, outside medical researchers and journalists thought to be working together to put out negative and “defamatory” information about the agency.

F.D.A. officials defended the surveillance operation, saying that the computer monitoring was limited to the five scientists suspected of leaking confidential information about the safety and design of medical devices.

While they acknowledged that the surveillance tracked the communications that the scientists had with Congressional officials, journalists and others, they said it was never intended to impede those communications, but only to determine whether information was being improperly shared.

The agency, using so-called spy software designed to help employers monitor workers, captured screen images from the government laptops of the five scientists as they were being used at work or at home. The software tracked their keystrokes, intercepted their personal e-mails, copied the documents on their personal thumb drives and even followed their messages line by line as they were being drafted, the documents show.
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In Vast Effort, F.D.A. Spied on E-Mails of Its Own Scientists (Original Post) Celebration Jul 2012 OP
The term 'so-called spy software' is suspcct. If they're communicating online, it's s freebie. freshwest Jul 2012 #1

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
1. The term 'so-called spy software' is suspcct. If they're communicating online, it's s freebie.
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 01:22 PM
Jul 2012

If they are whistleblowing, which this article would indicate they are, although it doesn't say specifically in the OP escerpt, it's standard practice to refute allegations of impropriety. Even if both sides are dirty.

If they are, and this is a big IF, as the FDA since Bush has been loaded with scientists in the pocket of corporations seeking to skew the data to make decisions to profit them, they are working on the side for one firm against another, this could be termed corporate espionage.

There is no privacy when transmitting data from an organization you do not own, like employees in any private concern, the owners legally can and are duty bound to follow that trail. This does not rise to the sensationalist term of 'spying,' but does sell newspapers.

JMHO.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Health»In Vast Effort, F.D.A. Sp...