Health
Related: About this forumResearch ban for surgeons after probiotic experiment
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22099-research-ban-for-surgeons-after-probiotic-experiment.htmlIt sounds like a particularly lurid episode of the TV medical drama House: in a last-ditch attempt to help people with advanced brain cancer, their surgical wounds are deliberately infected with "probiotic" bacteria to stimulate their immune systems into fighting the tumours.
Rather than ending with miraculous recoveries, however, this incident led to two surgeons at the University of California, Davis, being banned from conducting research on human volunteers.
News of the surgeons' reprimand, revealed by the Sacramento Bee newspaper, has alarmed bioethicists. "There are a lot of red flags," says Jonathan Kimmelman of McGill University in Montreal, Canada, who studies the ethics of clinical research.
The case raises tough questions about the standards of evidence that should be met before experimental therapies are tested in people even those with just weeks to live who may feel that they have nothing to lose.
libodem
(19,288 posts)Ewwwwww.
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)else can be over the line.
One item of the Obama Health Care plan that gets rare mention is an effort to actually collect data on the results of common surgeries. There are parts of this country where women past menopause get hysterectomies on a very routine basis. Collecting data comparing results may reduce the number of hysterectomies, and cut into some surgeons' pocketbooks! Certain very common cardiac procedures have never been examined scientifically, either.
Celebration
(15,812 posts)The patients had a couple of weeks to live and consented to the procedure? Good grief, I would throw a Hail Mary pass at that point. The patients and the surgeon should be able to decide the treatment at that point, without interference.
This sounds like micromanagement by bureaucrats.
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)It isn't as if they had anything to lose at that point.