Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Tue Jun 4, 2013, 08:03 AM Jun 2013

Most Doctors Don’t Meet U.S. Push for Electronic Records

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-03/most-doctors-don-t-meet-u-s-push-for-electronic-records.html

Fewer than 1 in 10 doctors used electronic records last year to U.S. standards, according to a survey that shows the challenge facing a multibillion-dollar effort to digitize the health system for improved patient care.

Only 9.8 percent of 1,820 primary-care and specialty doctors said they had electronic systems that met U.S. rules for “meaningful use,” a list of tasks such as tracking referrals or filling prescriptions online. Less than half all those surveyed, or 44 percent, had any system in place, according to the report published by the journal Annals of Internal Medicine.

The Obama administration has spent about $15 billion since 2009 to help doctors and hospitals adopt electronic health records, fueling growth for vendors such as McKesson Corp. (MCK) and Cerner Corp. (CERN) In March, the administration said it was considering new regulations, amid complaints that the systems are hard to use and don’t share information easily.

The survey “ should be of concern to policy makers,” said the authors, led by Catherine M. DesRoches of Mathematica Policy Research Inc. in Cambridge, Massachusetts. “Significant progress needs to be made before such systems are believed to be usable by most physicians.”
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Most Doctors Don’t Meet U.S. Push for Electronic Records (Original Post) xchrom Jun 2013 OP
"fueling growth for vendors such as McKesson Corp. (MCK) and Cerner Corp. (CERN)" dixiegrrrrl Jun 2013 #1
That would be an effective way to keep America's Opioid problem hidden. tridim Jun 2013 #2
So the usual proprietary bottlenecks and boondoggles. nt bemildred Jun 2013 #3

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
1. "fueling growth for vendors such as McKesson Corp. (MCK) and Cerner Corp. (CERN)"
Tue Jun 4, 2013, 08:35 AM
Jun 2013

Somehow those vendors managed to find my doc's lil clinic in this out of the way Mayberry lil town.
And the outpatient office visit cost doubled.

Now if only they had trained the docs and staff how to use the computer program.

Or the pharmacy staff that is supposed to get the prescription from the doc's computer.
( Can you say "FUBAR'?)

Or the hospital's outpatient services clinic that does mammograms, and which insisted, on my follow up appt.,
that according to their computers, I had never been there 6 months earlier for the tests I was following up on.
"Yes, we see you are here for a follow up visit, ordered by your doctor, but we have no record of you getting any tests 6 months ago" said the nice young thang, peering into the puter screen.


Which reminds me, I gotta call Medicare, who paid for that non-existent visit.


tridim

(45,358 posts)
2. That would be an effective way to keep America's Opioid problem hidden.
Tue Jun 4, 2013, 08:50 AM
Jun 2013

Or at least a good way to shield the kingpins and make obscene amounts of money selling people powerful drugs they don't need.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Health»Most Doctors Don’t Meet U...