Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Pets

Kingofalldems

(38,458 posts) Sat Feb 21, 2015, 11:49 AM Feb 2015

Cat photo bombing:

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Cat photo bombing: (Original Post) Kingofalldems Feb 2015 OP

The looks on both of their faces... narnian60 Feb 2015 #1

That about sums it up BrotherIvan Feb 2015 #2

Another cat plot BrotherIvan Feb 2015 #3

This is really why I come here...the politics are just an excuse. libdem4life Feb 2015 #4

Another one tencats Feb 2015 #5

narnian60

(3,510 posts)

1. The looks on both of their faces...

Reply to Kingofalldems (Original post)

Sat Feb 21, 2015, 01:53 PM

Feb 2015

...hilarious!

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)

2. That about sums it up

Reply to Kingofalldems (Original post)

Sat Feb 21, 2015, 02:38 PM

Feb 2015

Dog: guiless, tongue hanging out
Cat: plotting revenge

Dogue de Bordeaux pictures always crack me up. That's some slobbery meatball of love right there.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)

3. Another cat plot

Reply to Kingofalldems (Original post)

Sat Feb 21, 2015, 02:42 PM

Feb 2015

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)

4. This is really why I come here...the politics are just an excuse.

Reply to Kingofalldems (Original post)

Sat Feb 21, 2015, 05:20 PM

Feb 2015

Dogs drool, cats rule. (because they plot)

tencats

(567 posts)

5. Another one

Reply to Kingofalldems (Original post)

Sat Feb 21, 2015, 09:13 PM

Feb 2015

Its one of my early efforts to photo record my cats. Here it had taken a long time to position my cat Yoda with the pear in just the right light. I got only one good snap and when I down loaded it, there was the nosy Mouse in there uninvited.

Reply to this discussion