Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumHicks had a concealed weapons permit
The three victims were identified by police and school officials in the early hours of Wednesday morning. They were all young adults with ties to universities in the region
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2015/02/11/three-killed-in-shooting-near-university-of-north-carolina/
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Good thing that the NRA defends the right of idiots to carry a gun everywhere. Never know when a gun nut might have to defend his/her right to a parking space.
samsingh
(17,601 posts)samsingh
(17,601 posts)beevul
(12,194 posts)Does that mean you and everyone else that supports strict gun control are guilty of attempted murder by extension too?
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)A real nasty asshole killed them.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)krispos42
(49,445 posts)...that means that he had ready access to his guns, regardless of concealed-carry status. True?
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)benEzra
(12,148 posts)NC requires either a written permission slip from your local sheriff, or a carry license (Federal background check, state background check, mental health records check, class on self-defense law, live fire evaluation on a shooting range) to so much as purchase a handgun, regardless of whether it is a private sale or from a licensed dealer.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,482 posts)...but you can still buy machine guns and tanks at a gun show right?
DonP
(6,185 posts)I know because my sister told me so.
Like most of the other "gun control experts" we have here she's never been to a gun show in her life but she "knows".
Just find the right table, wink and nod at the guy the right way and for $5 you can get a kit to convert any AR or AK to full auto. She assured me they are under the table at every gun show. Might be $10 now?
Surprisingly, she had no interest in actually going with me to a gun show to prove her point and so she could alert the police to the crimes being committed.
Or ... you can just go to Youtube for detailed instructions on using a paper clip to go full auto, just like this one
(Now let's see which idiot alerts on this without actually watching it first. The details are around 3:26.)
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)I am going to give that a shot for my next range trip.
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)Last edited Thu Feb 12, 2015, 02:54 AM - Edit history (1)
No, the Cause Of Death will be listed as Gunshot Wound(s). The gun made it much easier for the bigot to kill other people when he wanted to.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Good grief, the gun make it easier, the permit had nothing to do with it.
The guns aren't goin' anywhere, baby.
Madison had a zinger back in the day, check it out:
The highest number to which, according to the best computation, a standing army can be carried in any country, does not exceed one hundredth part of the whole number of souls; or one twenty-fifth part of the number able to bear arms.
This proportion would not yield, in the United States, an army of more than twenty-five or thirty thousand men.
To these would be opposed a militia amounting to near half a million of citizens with arms in their hands, officered by men chosen from among themselves, fighting for their common liberties, and united and conducted by governments possessing their affections and confidence.
It may well be doubted, whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops. Those who are best acquainted with the last successful resistance of this country against the British arms, will be most inclined to deny the possibility of it.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172160690
The 2A, it ain't just for hunting or target shooting.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)We're working it out, we just need to do the things that we need to do to keep guns out of the wrong hands.
We'll get there, I'm confident!
Response to NYC_SKP (Reply #16)
Fred Sanders This message was self-deleted by its author.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)up to and including President Obama.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)I would like, however, to point out that the arguably most restrictive state, California, has first and foremost in it's Constitution, the Civil Right to self defense and defense of property:
ARTICLE 1 DECLARATION OF RIGHTS
SECTION 1. All people are by nature free and independent and have
inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and
liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing
and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy.
http://leginfo.ca.gov/.const/.article_1
Freedom of press comes later in that document. Oh, the bolding is mine.
I'm glad that our militia is reasonably well regulated, but beyond that are state's obligations to our rights.
It makes for an interesting debate!
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)The religion angle was speculation. While Hicks is a member of Atheists for Equality, and has made statements about what he describes as radical Christianity and Islam (aka Fundies), the the dispute had nothing to do with religion according to police. It was an ongoing issue over a parking space.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)gejohnston
(17,502 posts)http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/02/11/north-carolina-muslim-students-gunman-chapel-hill/23222317/
While I have a low opinion of USA Today (well shit, US media in general), it was quoting the cop. Speculation by family members are just that.
Of course, religion could have something to do with it. It seems to me that the victims could have just as easily been Mormon, Pentecostal, or Wiccan. There are bigoted and loathsome atheists just like there are despicable fundies.
All I care about is that he spends the rest of his natural life in cage if convicted.
My bet is that he will plead guilty to second degree.
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)DonP
(6,185 posts)May have taken you a couple of days, but we all had confidence that you'd finally find somebody else's cartoon to express yourself so poignantly.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)1. They are intended to promote an emotional response, and theirs is an emotionally based
cause.
2. You can't really 'rebut' a cartoon, and simply reposting one without comment
ensures that their ...work... won't end up here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/11729858
for the amusement and edification of all.
3. It's also a great way to reassure themselves that all the cool kids agree with them...
blueridge3210
(1,401 posts)When a controller can argue neither the facts or the law, let's post a cartoon that appeals to emotion.
Straight from the VPC playbook; business as usual.
stone space
(6,498 posts)Last edited Thu Mar 5, 2015, 03:06 PM - Edit history (1)
A real nasty asshole killed them.
He didn't kill them all alone.
He had help.
Bigotry alone is not enough to overpower and kill three people.
You are ignoring what it is that gave his bigotry its power, and what gave Hicks his courage.
Bigots are a dime a dozen.
This is artificially enhanced bigotry, empowered by the deadly weapon that he used to stalk and terrorize these three Muslims with over time, and finally, to murder them.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)They has more than ties to the community, the girls father was a well known psychiatrist, the children in higher learning, dentistry and humanitarian aide.
.........
Dad says victims talked about 'hateful' neighbor
The father of the slain women, Mohammed Abu-Salha, however, said his older daughter told him several times that she was scared by a "condescending" neighbor who had come more than once to their doorstep with a gun in his waistband.
"They felt he was hateful, and she used that word," Mohammed Abu-Salha said. "She said, 'Daddy, we feel he hates us for who we are and how we look.' And our daughters dressed in the Muslim attire."
Barakat's sister, Dr. Suzanne Barakat, called on authorities to investigate "these senseless and heinous murders as a hate crime."
Read more at http://www.wral.com/questions-surround-motive-in-muslim-students-shooting-deaths/14439969/#jpXAdJdZdk6a2ZMm.99
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)Response to GGJohn (Reply #19)
Paladin This message was self-deleted by its author.
spin
(17,493 posts)A recent change in the state allows a brief display of a legally concealed firearm such as might happen when my jacket is blown back by the wind in a parking lot.
However if I pull my jacket back to intimidate a person by revealing that I am armed, I can get into a world of trouble with the local police. I'm pretty sure the police would call it brandishing unless I had a damn good reason for showing it (like I was being attacked by someone who intends to seriously injure or kill me.)
I know some instructors in concealed weapons permit classes told their students never to show their handguns to stop an attack but to draw it and shoot the attacker. One said, "If you pull your handgun it better end up smoking." However that was before the new law passed.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)Either way, how does that add to the story?
Having a CWP places restrictions on the carrier and requires him to meet more requirements to carry the gun.
The story as reports shows no relevancy to an CWP since they are not required to own a handgun.
ileus
(15,396 posts)aikoaiko
(34,184 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)ileus
(15,396 posts)Remember all those...."Religion is the devil" threads you normally read over at DU.
I suppose this is the, exception rather than the rule with this Atheist and CC.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)that doesn't mean he had one. It also says he has had mental health issues, but mental health checks are part of the NC CCW application process. It is possible that the lawyer confused a CCW with a purchase permit, which NC enacted in 1919.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)Hicks may very well have had a CCW permit-then again, this might be another example of:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=118&topic_id=285630
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1172&pid=5456
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=118x270147
Time will tell...
ileus
(15,396 posts)ileus
(15,396 posts)jimmy the one
(2,708 posts)Ben ezra, post 28 above: A while back, the Brady Campaign ranked NC as 13th strictest in the nation, or somesuch. NC requires either a written permission slip from your local sheriff, or a carry license (Federal background check, state background check, mental health records check, class on self-defense law, live fire evaluation on a shooting range) to so much as purchase a handgun, regardless of whether it is a private sale or from a licensed dealer.
It's fairly apparent Ezra is trying to portray brady campaign as endorsing north Carolina as at least leaning towards gun control; but brady campaign gave north Carolina an F for 2013 & 2014, the rest of the story:
Among other things, North Carolina requires all handgun purchasers to first obtain a license, after undergoing a background check. However, North Carolina does not:
Require a person to undergo a background check prior to purchasing a long gun from an unlicensed seller;
Prohibit the transfer or possession of assault weapons, 50 caliber rifles, or large capacity ammunition magazines;
License or significantly regulate firearms dealers;
Limit the number of firearms that may be purchased at one time;
Require firearm owners to report lost or stolen firearms;
Regulate unsafe handguns;
Regulate ammunition sales;
Allow local governments to regulate firearms or ammunition; or
Provide local law enforcement with discretion to deny a license to carry firearms.
In 2010, North Carolina had the 20th highest number of gun deaths per capita among the states. North Carolina had the 20th highest rate of crime gun exports among the states in 2009meaning that crime guns originally sold in North Carolina were recovered after being used in crimes in other states at the 20th highest rate among the states.
http://smartgunlaws.org/north-carolina-state-law-summary/
http://smartgunlaws.org/2013-state-scorecard-why-gun-laws-matter/