Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,482 posts)
Thu Apr 9, 2015, 09:14 PM Apr 2015

Should any of this change?

(I tried looking for more recent info but I haven't found any yet)

As of 2002, 15 states automatically restore the firearm rights of convicts upon their release from prison or completion of parole, and 6 other states automatically restore the firearm rights of juvenile convicts upon their release from prison or completion of parole. In 2004, the Office of the Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Justice wrote that this system...

"...may result in a paradoxical situation in which someone convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence is permanently barred from owning a firearm, while someone who kills his spouse has his firearm rights restored after serving his sentence."

4 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
Violent felons should lose their firearm rights for good, rights for misdemeanor convictions should follow state guidelines
3 (75%)
Individual courts should decide
1 (25%)
Other
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

linuxman

(2,337 posts)
1. Non-violent felons should have ALL rights restored upon completion of their punishment.
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 01:09 AM
Apr 2015

Violent felons should never be allowed to touch a weapon again.

petronius

(26,603 posts)
2. I'm generally uncomfortable with lifetime bans on any civil right or civil liberty
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 01:28 AM
Apr 2015

In the case of 2A, I think all people should eventually have the right restored after a period of time: 1, 5, 10, 15, ?? years depending on the original conviction, with the clock restarted upon subsequent offenses...

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,482 posts)
3. Hmmmm
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 11:58 AM
Apr 2015

I'm probably okay with that except I think violent felons should be segregated (depending on the type of crime) for life.
Violent felons that could be classified as predators should be in max security for life.

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
4. This is not about a civil right. It's about guns.
Sat Apr 11, 2015, 08:44 AM
Apr 2015
I'm generally uncomfortable with lifetime bans on any civil right or civil liberty


 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
5. SCOTUS, the Constitution, the President,
Sat Apr 11, 2015, 10:19 AM
Apr 2015

the vast majority of states in this country and the people who WROTE the Constitution view that ownership of firearms is a civil right.

For an alleged university professor you appear to be very mis-informed on this subject.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
12. Wrong again
Sat Apr 11, 2015, 02:04 PM
Apr 2015

You are entitled to believe what you like, but that doesn't make your beliefs correct.

For an alleged college professor I'm surprised you don't seem to understand that the United States Constitution, along with many state constitutions, state that ownership of firearms is indeed a civil right.

benEzra

(12,148 posts)
13. Guns are not civil rights, but the right own own and lawfully guns is.
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 08:14 PM
Apr 2015

Just like "printing presses are not civil rights", but the right to own and lawfully use them is---protected by the amendment right before the one about arms ownership and use.

petronius

(26,603 posts)
11. You're entitled to your beliefs, of course. Although any interested readers who
Sat Apr 11, 2015, 01:05 PM
Apr 2015

choose to do their own brief follow-up will quickly find that you're mistaken in this one...

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
9. A Civil Right? You mean like the Right to Vote?
Sat Apr 11, 2015, 12:33 PM
Apr 2015

The Right to Vote should never be taken away from anybody under any circumstances.

Incarcerated inmates can easily vote from their prison cells by absentee ballot.

We just need to respect their Civil and Human Right to do so.

Recognizing the Right to Vote as a basic Civil and Human Right would mean allowing inmates ballots in their prison cells, and I fully support this.

There's no need to restore the Right to Vote to anybody. Just don't violate it in the first place.



Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Should any of this change...