Provided to them all. Almost seems like some kind of talking points that were provided by a group.

and then I had to stop.

Would you like to discuss it?

They seem to share your opinions.

You are a MDA/everytown/Bloomberg cheerleader, aren't you?

How come you don't want to discuss it?

Our SOP does say 'discuss' you know.

Why yes, yes it was:


http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172171573#post7

They fabricate, alter, disregard and abolish rules as they see fit not as part of a equal and civil society but solely to advance their own purposes.

Exactly the last sort of people to be making law.

Again, was their something about the OP that you wished to discuss?

See....it's really that simple.

Truly sad how he does not respect this group or the group host to and least discuss his posts as the SOP states. I find that disappointing to say the least.

Is it representative?

Is it legitimate?

Did those people say those things?

Or are you going to be like Fred Sanders, where every different opinion is "an NRA talking point" and thus a complete and utter lie?


If freeper links to a DU post, does that DU post become a lie?

Ironic, oui?

He's a giver.

Notice how even in their "outrage" on here on differing issues, how they all sound alike?

It's almost as if they need to be told, when to be "outraged".

Just the point I made in a post a few days ago in response to Fred Sanders.

If they are all reading the same script, can't they all read it at once in unison and save a lot of time?