Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 12:46 PM Aug 2015

Former Police Officer Files Racketeering Lawsuit Against Los Angeles Police Department

Former Police Officer Files Racketeering Lawsuit Against Los Angeles Police Department

Posted by: mapcadmin 5 Aug

On behalf of war veteran and former police officer Wayne Wright, Michel & Associates filed a federal lawsuit in Los Angeles on Friday, July 31, against the LAPD, the Los Angeles City Attorney’s office, and involved employees and policymakers who conspired to destroy Mr. Wright’s firearm collection.

Mr. Wright’s firearm collection was seized by LAPD in 2004 after he was entrapped by them into allowing one of their undercover detectives to carry a firearm that was being transported to an FFL for a lawful transfer. LAPD then used this bad arrest to get a warrant to seize the entirety of Mr. Wright’s collection, some 400-plus firearms comprised primarily of curio and relic pieces.

After Mr. Wright became eligible for the return of his firearms, LAPD’s notorious Gun Unit and the City Attorney’s office put Mr. Wright through a five-year odyssey of illegal requirements to “prove” he owned the guns they seized from him in order to purportedly gain their return. While LAPD represented to Mr. Wright that his firearms would eventually be returned if he complied with LAPD’s unlawful requests for proof of ownership, the City Attorney’s office surreptitiously applied for an ex parte order to destroy the collection, and the LAPD then did so without any notice to Mr. Wright.

LAPD has been previously sued for its failure to provide basic due process or follow state law when it comes to returning firearms to their owners. In that prior matter, Sarah McGee, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., USDC Central District of California Case No. 98-2043GHK, then-Chief Bernard Parks agreed to implement Special Order No. 1, making compliance with state law regarding return of firearms an express policy of the LAPD. Once again, LAPD has ignored state law as well as its own policy, and the result is the destruction of priceless collector’s items valued in the aggregate at nearly three-quarters-of-a-million dollars.

http://michellawyers.com/former-police-officer-files-racketeering-lawsuit-against-los-angeles-police-department/



Interesting case. IMO, It shows yet another example of anti-gun ideology run amok. And another example of why we should not trust more power over guns being given to law enforcement without equally powerful restraints and oversight on the use of that power, and real teeth to punish severely publicly and permanently (abuse someones rights and forfeit being a LEO forever), abusers of such power.
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Former Police Officer Files Racketeering Lawsuit Against Los Angeles Police Department (Original Post) beevul Aug 2015 OP
Your museum pieces are murdering people! Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2015 #1
Anti-gun ideology tends to be extremely expensive to the taxpayers. virginia mountainman Aug 2015 #2
Just another gun nut crying over seized guns SecularMotion Aug 2015 #3
stuff like this is why pro gun people fight at every turn. clffrdjk Aug 2015 #4
Which is why Connecticut's registration law is nullified by non-participation. Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2015 #10
So, in your fevered imagination the man in the OP is the moral equivalent of terry Nicols. Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2015 #5
Look on the bright side... beevul Aug 2015 #7
That whole due process thing is over rated, right? DonP Aug 2015 #6
Calm down Don... beevul Aug 2015 #8
In prohibition there is $$$. Eleanors38 Aug 2015 #9

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
1. Your museum pieces are murdering people!
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 01:26 PM
Aug 2015

I'd wager some of the nicer pieces found their way into the private collections of some the LAPD.

virginia mountainman

(5,046 posts)
2. Anti-gun ideology tends to be extremely expensive to the taxpayers.
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 02:19 PM
Aug 2015

Not to mention what it does to some of the innocents that are disarmed by it.

 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
3. Just another gun nut crying over seized guns
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 02:33 PM
Aug 2015
Federal judge wants to know if FBI still has guns belonging to Terry Nichols

DENVER — The federal judge who presided over the Oklahoma City bombing trials wants information from the FBI before considering Terry Nichols’ request for guns seized from him 20 years ago.

Senior U.S. District Judge Richard Matsch on Friday ordered federal authorities to report to him whether the FBI still has the guns.

Last month, Nichols asked Matsch to order the FBI to turn over guns agents seized from his Herington, Kansas, home soon after the 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building.

Nichols, serving life prison terms for helping Timothy McVeigh with the bombing, wants his guns turned over to either one of his two ex-wives or his sister. He did not identify the type of guns but said there were about 10 of them.

http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/crimewatch/federal-judge-wants-to-know-if-fbi-still-has-guns/article_185e587c-d4f1-5fb4-8da8-968b530177d1.html
 

clffrdjk

(905 posts)
4. stuff like this is why pro gun people fight at every turn.
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 02:54 PM
Aug 2015

You anti gun people can't be trusted to even follow the law.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
10. Which is why Connecticut's registration law is nullified by non-participation.
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 03:46 PM
Aug 2015

If the Controllers won't obey the law why should we? They pass a law decreeing nothing but knife fights -- then they bring a gun.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
5. So, in your fevered imagination the man in the OP is the moral equivalent of terry Nicols.
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 02:58 PM
Aug 2015

This is why gun control is little more than a self-aggrandizing joke.

 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
7. Look on the bright side...
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 03:16 PM
Aug 2015
...the man in the OP is the moral equivalent of terry Nicols.


Look on the bright side, at least the holders of the ideology in question can't help but self identify sooner or later. And we have an example of that here, don't we.

But perhaps most pertinent and certainly most sweet, is the fact that your interlocutor is a 'gun owner' and purportedly has 'reasonable' views on the gun issue.

I guess we can point to this thread and laugh next time he/she tries to spin that yarn.

As we've seen before, sometimes, when the mask slips, it really slips
 

DonP

(6,185 posts)
6. That whole due process thing is over rated, right?
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 03:05 PM
Aug 2015

After all, even though he wasn't convicted of anything, his private property should be forfeit, right?

Remember that the next time your car gets towed in case they decide to sell it for scrap before you get to the impound lot.

The law is just a convenience that should be used when it benefits a cause you like.

After all GUNZ!!!

 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
8. Calm down Don...
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 03:18 PM
Aug 2015

As we've been repeatedly assured, SecMo is a 'gun owner' and only supports 'reasonable restrictions'.




Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Former Police Officer Fil...