Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumTwo-thirds back national gun registry
American opinion about guns and gun control hasnt changed much in the last five years, but the latest Economist/YouGov Poll provides new information about how the public gun owners and non-gun owners alike viewed gun restrictions while the trial of the 2012 Aurora, Colorado theater shooter was in its penalty phase.
There are some limitations that gun owners would accept: they are just as likely as the public overall to support preventing those with a history of mental illness from owning guns. James Holmes, the Aurora shooter, while judged sane under Colorado law (defined as knowing the difference between right and wrong) was under psychiatric treatment and had legally purchased weapons he used in the shootings.
[center][/center]
https://today.yougov.com/news/2015/08/10/two-thirds-back-national-gun-registry/
ileus
(15,396 posts)I could give two shits less what anyone else desires when I comes to the 2A.
hack89
(39,171 posts)doesn't matter if it works, only that it makes them feel better.
DonP
(6,185 posts)Or are you going to just post random Google dumps and not do anything to make your dreams of more gun control come to pass?
With 2/3 supporting your POV it should be no problem. Just start with one state and let's all see how it goes.
To show what great sports we gun owners are, here's a head start for you.
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/create-a-petition.html
"How to start a petition". You can either start with petitions to repeal concealed carry, demand registration or go whole hog and outright repeal the 2nd amendment.
Or are you gonna just sit there with your thumb somewhere and just keep whining online? Show everyone how "serious" you and your many supporters are about gun control!
Hell, you can probably get maybe 3 signature right here on DU alone in the other group to get the ball rolling.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)Most people, including many gun owners, are not that knowledgeable about guns.
The vast majority of people are rather clueless about gun laws.
beevul
(12,194 posts)Meh.
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)You want to entrust a future president Scott Walker or Jeb Bush or Marco Rubio with a national gun registry? They may well lose in 2016, or 2020, but someday they or someone like them will win.
Be careful what powers you give to a hypothetical future president because the presidency will not always be held by a person you like and trust.
virginia mountainman
(5,046 posts)They cant even register guns in NY state, what makes you think you can in the rest of the nation??
Straw Man
(6,625 posts)... that we don't govern ourselves by plebiscite.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)I am sure NRA lovers know exactly how clueless their pathetic defences of the GUN are, and their defence of the NRA that opposes everything but more guns; how ridiculous to the point of hilarity they sound, but they just do not care, as they do not care about the gun carnage in America...it is truly a sickness, this gun-loving.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)Okay, five things.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)Unless you've got an eidetic memory, that's not happening. And even if you did, it's not like any of the 100,000,000 owners won't move and forget to call you.
National registry, there's a real brain-fart of an idea.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)NRA? That's your over-wrought obsession, not mine. (I've always wondered. Who uses the NRA word most, pro-2A or anti 2A folks?)
As for your poll, there are many things the American public has favored, dis-favored, and changed its mind on. Several things come to mind: Inter-racial marriage, GLBT marriage, alcohol prohibition, drug prohibition, etc. That's why we have a Constitution which recognizes certain rights which cannot be infringed and abridged -- no matter what or who favors such. And that is why we have the courts to determine when such infringement occurs.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)"Who uses the NRA word more...." You made me laugh. Thanks for that!
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)gejohnston
(17,502 posts)was quite low. Germany estimates only one in five privately owned firearms are registered.
beardown
(363 posts)Does the registry tie each gun to an individual?
What type of after registry laws are needed to make the registry effective in providing more safety or control?
Since 99+ percent of guns are never used in a crime or violence and in all likelihood the ones that are will not be registered, how long do you think it will take before the bad guns (unregistered) get filtered out of the system?
What sort of guarantees or safe guards would be tied to the registry to prevent gun confiscation from people law abiding enough to register their guns while the criminal guns are not being registered, ie law abiding gun owners disarmed while criminals are not?
Just curious if this is just aimed at another paper tiger (ignored action) or one with the intent to confiscate guns or is there a comprehensive plan that would register guns and protect law abiding gun owners and provide more safety to society?
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)virginia mountainman
(5,046 posts)The US is not populated by the much more "docile" and "compliant" Australians, the US is populated by people that do not like to be told what they can and can't do...
Fred, you can comply with the registry, I can assure you I won't, ....and I have the guns.....
My civil liberties are not negotiable....
beevul
(12,194 posts)That is where the rubber meets the road.
There are way way more that don't like to be told told what they can and can't do, particularly beyond a certain point where things get stupid, than those that presume/want to be doing the telling, and I don't think anyone quite grasps how deep that sentiment runs in Americans at large.
History is replete with examples for those not too blind to see them.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)I saw an estimate about 20 percent, which is the same as Germany's and Canada's compliance rates.
beardown
(363 posts)That's probably a bad example because I thought that Australia confiscated many of their citizens' guns.
If the purpose of the registry is merely the first step to disarm the public then no wonder gun folks are compelled to resist any additional controls as merely Trojan horses.
So back to my questions, how would it work in the USA?
pablo_marmol
(2,375 posts)since...... A) the public at large doesn't know diddley about the nature of gun violence, and ......
B) public sentiment is irrelevant in the first place, since the 2nd is a protected right.
But thanks once again for the piffle, SecMo --- it goes nicely with my late night waffles w/blackberry syrup.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)...as their means of suicide:
In 2013, a gun was used in 21,175 of 41,149 total suicides.
A bit over half. Those are what I call a self-validated opinions.
>> http://webappa.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/mortrate10_us.html <<
Opinions are only useful if they've been validated. My wife spent the last 40 years avoiding crushed red peppers on her pizza. Her opinion was that they would be too spicy for her. She finally tried them. She'd been wrong for 40 years.