That would have meant including the answer the group gave to the question. She edited out their entire answer.

...sack of shit. Plain and simple, she feels justified because gunz. The truth is merely an inconvenience to her obtaining her goal.

That this ever was intended to be a "fair and balanced" documentary.

I notice you have not yet responded to my direct question to you about the apparently felonious gun purchases made by the filmmakers. http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172194902#post3
I assume it is simply an oversight at this time.

He failed to answer mine on that to. I guess they are just scared, lol

No not really. Like a number of MSM outlets they are only interested in the news that fits.

A trend that people on the control side are much better at asking questions then answering them. More accurately, they demand answers will never giving any in return.

The willingness to point the finger of guilt at millions of gun owners who have never committed a crime while ignoring felonious activities by fellow control advocates simply illustrates the hypocrisy and moral bankruptcy of the movement.

Means "exposing my lies"

Misrepresentation is a primary tool of anti-gunners.

She really thinks her doctoredmentary will shake the world. Heh. Bad shocks on a washboard road come closer.

though I could hardly term that ideology "radical."

Kind of like what you guys do in bansalot.

Since you are the one championing this film and its editor, for the sake of reasonableness you should also be willing to discuss and defend HERE in GC&RKBA. Your unwillingness to do so shows that you are nothing more than Spamsalot from Bansalot.

It's chickenshit, and yeah, I'm calling you out.

Now why would I want to do that? You are doing such a fine job of it

Funny how it is worthy to post because you *think* it makes pro-rkba look bad, yet you cannot muster up the gumption to defend it. Maybe you can get a job working for Ms. Couric.

That the media is lying in order to try to shape public opinion and you cannot seem to find anything wrong with that is an interesting position for a....Democrat.

I have been told to pound sand either

How many "creative decisions" does it take to make a "documentary" ???

Or would this be a "creative documentary" ?

It appears that the "radical" group totally DESTROYED, and I mean utterly destroyed, Katie Couric's credibility..No need for her to apologize, no one would believe it.

This is what happens when a holier than thou elites get pwned by the "great unwashed"...

Dan Rather got fired for less...

Talk about a right wing source

"California Attorney General Kamala Harris, a candidate actively campaigning for the Senate seat that is opening up with Barbara Boxer’s retirement, recently made the news when she tried to shame members of Congress for refusing to enact unconstitutional and counterproductive gun-control laws. “They should have closed the chambers of Congress on the House and the Senate side, and said all you members go in there, only you, and spread out the autopsy photographs of and them to look at those photographs. And then vote your conscience,” Harris said at Politicon, a political convention held in Los Angeles.1

Wow! That’s some pretty extreme rhetoric. But is the pot calling the kettle black here? Harris is the highest level law enforcement officer in California, and the head of the Department of Justice (DOJ). DOJ is responsible for maintaining criminal records, mental illness records, records of those who have become ineligible to possess firearms, and all of the databases used to perform background checks on gun buyers, to register firearms, and to take firearms away from people who are prohibited from possessing them but who still have firearms registered in their name.

Those records, and the related databases, are a hot mess."

http://213ajq29v6vk19b76q3534cx.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Special-Feature-K-Harris.pdf