Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kaleva

(36,328 posts)
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 08:16 AM Apr 2012

Neighbors in Newton County, Ga. case are now in jail and have been charged.

Last edited Tue Apr 24, 2012, 07:29 PM - Edit history (2)

"On Monday, Canoles and his son were summoned for another interview with Newton County officials, who told them to bring in their guns.

"I don't know what they can charge me with," Canoles said late Monday afternoon, before the interview with authorities. "This is my Second Amendment right. Look, this is the county out here, and we protect our own.""

http://www.ajc.com/news/newton-county-neighbors-charged-1424231.html

Update to the article:

"They turned themselves in about 10 p.m. Monday and were booked into the Newton County Jail just before midnight, according to sheriff's spokesman Mark Mitchell. They were being held without bond Tuesday, online jail records show."

Edit: Update-"A Newton County man and his son who authorities said held a gun on the new owners of a neighboring home were arrested Monday night and charged with aggravated assault, false imprisonment and criminal trespass."

78 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Neighbors in Newton County, Ga. case are now in jail and have been charged. (Original Post) Kaleva Apr 2012 OP
No sympathy for these idiots...it wasn't their property, was it? rfranklin Apr 2012 #1
I don't have any sympathy for them either. Kaleva Apr 2012 #2
I'm not defending these guys but tularetom Apr 2012 #3
Well, it was 10 p.m. when they were booked Kaleva Apr 2012 #4
If they wanted to post bond, they shouldn't have shown-up at 10 pm when the judge is asleep. n/t Ian David Apr 2012 #6
BS. It's not their fault.. TheCowsCameHome Apr 2012 #8
It also probably took them all day to dig all their guns out of all those holes. Ian David Apr 2012 #14
I don't think Georgia has a registration scheme gejohnston Apr 2012 #17
The very fact that they don't see what they did wrong is why their guns should be taken away. n/t Ian David Apr 2012 #5
Exactly. Hoyt Apr 2012 #20
So I guess because you can't provide links to what you claim I said AH1Apache Apr 2012 #22
So much for 'stand your ground' Cirque du So-What Apr 2012 #7
There's no outrage expressed in OP title about them surrendering their guns Kaleva Apr 2012 #11
That's what I was referring to Cirque du So-What Apr 2012 #29
that seems to be the Canole's outrage gejohnston Apr 2012 #12
"Fuck the rights of the other homeowners, right?" rl6214 Apr 2012 #49
So that makes it alright? Cirque du So-What Apr 2012 #68
No, that dosen't at all make it all right. rl6214 Apr 2012 #69
OK, then, I'll leave it at that Cirque du So-What Apr 2012 #70
chill rl6214 Apr 2012 #75
these two certainly make my gejohnston Apr 2012 #9
These idiots hurt the gun clause more than anything! Call the police for... Logical Apr 2012 #10
Right away Canoles started spouting off TheCowsCameHome Apr 2012 #13
"The police told me I did a good job," izquierdista Apr 2012 #15
Can anyone say, Barney Fife? AH1Apache Apr 2012 #30
Racist gun vigilantes are such crybabies - and they took their precious extender devices!!!!1 jpak Apr 2012 #16
Did you really read the story jpak? AH1Apache Apr 2012 #18
BS. Racial aspect is pretty clear. Hoyt Apr 2012 #19
Your long on accusations and short on proof AH1Apache Apr 2012 #21
Proof? I'll bet they have confederate flags to go along with their AR-15s. Hoyt Apr 2012 #24
Just as I thought AH1Apache Apr 2012 #25
You aren't even willing to entertain the thought these guys might be assholes. They are certainly Hoyt Apr 2012 #32
Obviously you didn't read my earlier post AH1Apache Apr 2012 #34
And he says it again here on edit rl6214 Apr 2012 #51
This message was self-deleted by its author AH1Apache Apr 2012 #54
I don't think I have been there gejohnston Apr 2012 #23
Well they did shoot "In the Heat of the Night" there -- which is a good indication of what Hoyt Apr 2012 #39
Yes I have - lots of "banjo music" jpak Apr 2012 #27
Newton County is relatively close to the setting for "Deliverance." Hoyt Apr 2012 #33
The vigilante gun-toters held the homeowners at gun point - because they were black jpak Apr 2012 #26
Just as I thought AH1Apache Apr 2012 #28
Here are the white vigilante gun heros jpak Apr 2012 #35
Once again AH1Apache Apr 2012 #36
You are correct - it would be a racial thing only if the toters were black and the victim white jpak Apr 2012 #37
Just as I thought AH1Apache Apr 2012 #38
"This is my Second Amendment right. Look, this is the country out here, and we protect our own." ellisonz Apr 2012 #41
I'm not pretending AH1Apache Apr 2012 #42
You didn't answer my question. ellisonz Apr 2012 #43
It could mean anything AH1Apache Apr 2012 #45
Clearly it means something... ellisonz Apr 2012 #47
So now proof isn't needed. AH1Apache Apr 2012 #48
That's proof enough ellisonz Apr 2012 #50
Well then, by that standard, I could call you a bigot racist and not have to prove it. AH1Apache Apr 2012 #55
And you would be in error... ellisonz Apr 2012 #57
"our own" could very well be those in that neighborhood rl6214 Apr 2012 #53
How could he tell that these people were not part of his "own" then? n/t ellisonz Apr 2012 #56
I don't know how big Newton county GA is rl6214 Apr 2012 #58
You're making an assumption that the obvious interpretation... ellisonz Apr 2012 #59
I don't know about these guys gejohnston Apr 2012 #64
If you mean I would be in error in thinking you are a bigot racist AH1Apache Apr 2012 #60
I think you replied to the wrong post rl6214 Apr 2012 #65
You obviously have never spent much time in areas like that, or you are in a state of denial. Hoyt Apr 2012 #73
I have NEVER even been in the state rl6214 Apr 2012 #76
You'd be shocked, especially if you met those two, or the thousands like them. Hoyt Apr 2012 #77
"case closed" rl6214 Apr 2012 #52
I have no words Meiko Apr 2012 #31
"This is my Second Amendment right. Look, this is the country out here, and we protect our own." ellisonz Apr 2012 #40
You have zero proof that their bigots AH1Apache Apr 2012 #46
I agree with you. I think those idiots would have done the same thing to any race. n-t Logical Apr 2012 #61
Thank You AH1Apache Apr 2012 #62
Thanks! No apology needed. Strong opinions cause that from me also at times. I am sure... Logical Apr 2012 #63
He won't be replying. n/t ellisonz Apr 2012 #72
Less then friendly neighbors have now been charged Kaleva Apr 2012 #44
In Alabama this would have been legal. Atypical Liberal Apr 2012 #66
That might not be true because of this: Kaleva Apr 2012 #67
You are right! Atypical Liberal Apr 2012 #71
True, in Alabama they would have simply told the police, he "looked like" a burglar. Hoyt Apr 2012 #74
Canoles were released on bail Tuesday night Kaleva Apr 2012 #78
 

rfranklin

(13,200 posts)
1. No sympathy for these idiots...it wasn't their property, was it?
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 08:21 AM
Apr 2012

I think there is a good case here for menacing with a deadly weapon.

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
3. I'm not defending these guys but
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 08:26 AM
Apr 2012

"held without bond"? They did a stupid ignorant thing but not something that rises to that level IMO.

Meanwhile in Sanford Florida...

Ian David

(69,059 posts)
14. It also probably took them all day to dig all their guns out of all those holes.
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 08:43 AM
Apr 2012

And to make sure they were only turning in the ones that were legally registered to them.

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
17. I don't think Georgia has a registration scheme
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 09:06 AM
Apr 2012

but it looks like it will be a federal crime for them to possess any in the near future.

 

AH1Apache

(502 posts)
22. So I guess because you can't provide links to what you claim I said
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 10:04 AM
Apr 2012

means you should have your 1A right taken away? See how stupid that sounds?

Cirque du So-What

(25,965 posts)
7. So much for 'stand your ground'
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 08:29 AM
Apr 2012

It's been expanded to 'stand on someone else's ground and threaten to blow their heads off before bothering to find out WTF is going on first.' From the title of the OP, I sense that there's more outrage over the Canoles having to hand over their guns, however. Fuck the rights of the other homeowners, right?

Kaleva

(36,328 posts)
11. There's no outrage expressed in OP title about them surrendering their guns
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 08:36 AM
Apr 2012

Last night when I read the article, the latest update was that the Canoles had been told to bring in their guns to the police station. When I started this OP, I linked to the article again and then saw that they had been arrested at 10 p.m..

Frankly, I was glad that they had been told to bring their guns in and I just didn't bother rewriting the title of the OP after I saw the latest update.

Cirque du So-What

(25,965 posts)
29. That's what I was referring to
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 10:26 AM
Apr 2012

Their outrage over having to turn in their guns - that and their apparent inability to see that they'd done anything wrong.

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
12. that seems to be the Canole's outrage
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 08:39 AM
Apr 2012

more than the felony charges. Sometimes truth is stranger than fiction, and you can't fix stupid.

 

rl6214

(8,142 posts)
49. "Fuck the rights of the other homeowners, right?"
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 08:11 PM
Apr 2012

The other ones weren't the homeowners, their son is.

Cirque du So-What

(25,965 posts)
68. So that makes it alright?
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 10:02 AM
Apr 2012

That's a very fucked-up concept IMO. The neighbors apparently have more right to step onto the property of others and hold people at gunpoint than family members of the homeowner have to go into his property. Thanks for revealing where your sentiments lie, as you attempt to provide cover for what is obviously a crime on the part of the white, gun-totin' neighbors by pointing out the subtle distinction that it was the homeowner's parents - AS IF that makes any difference whatsoever.

 

rl6214

(8,142 posts)
69. No, that dosen't at all make it all right.
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 02:02 PM
Apr 2012

I just didn't know if you knew that. The neighbors had absolutely no right to do what they did and by getting arrested they got what they deserved.

"Thanks for revealing where your sentiments lie, as you attempt to provide cover for what is obviously a crime on the part of the white, gun-totin' neighbors by pointing out the subtle distinction that it was the homeowner's parents - AS IF that makes any difference whatsoever."

You are getting yourself all worked up over something I never said and you are imagining in your own mind. I just didn't know if you had read the entire article where it said that their son owned the property, nothing more, nothing less.

Cirque du So-What

(25,965 posts)
70. OK, then, I'll leave it at that
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 02:19 PM
Apr 2012

I read the article, dammit. I hate this about the gun forum: everything gets dragged down into meaningless shit like whose house it was anyway. WTF difference does it make whose house it is? Wanna argue about something else meaningless? Go bother someone else!

 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
10. These idiots hurt the gun clause more than anything! Call the police for...
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 08:35 AM
Apr 2012

Something like this!

TheCowsCameHome

(40,168 posts)
13. Right away Canoles started spouting off
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 08:41 AM
Apr 2012

about his 2A rights.

Evidently nothing else matters in that bonehead's narrow, one track mind.

 

izquierdista

(11,689 posts)
15. "The police told me I did a good job,"
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 08:44 AM
Apr 2012

Well, there's a couple of stupid-as-rocks deputies.

I have a feeling we haven't heard the last of this story.

 

AH1Apache

(502 posts)
18. Did you really read the story jpak?
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 09:19 AM
Apr 2012

Where did it say race was involved? Do you say that because there was an black man involved? Prove it.
These 2 idiots are nothing more that that, idiots, and now we'll wait to see if they are convicted and loose their 2A rights.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
19. BS. Racial aspect is pretty clear.
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 09:53 AM
Apr 2012

Ever been to Newton County, Georgia? You'd recognize that inbred look/stare. Guns and bigots seem to go together.

Grabbed their friggin AR-15s. Ole dad is a good influence on his son.

I wish the new homeowners well.

 

AH1Apache

(502 posts)
21. Your long on accusations and short on proof
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 09:57 AM
Apr 2012

Where in the story does it say race is involved? Show me some proof and I might actually believe you for once.
You are the one here with the bigotry about gun owners as you've proven here time and time again.

BTW, got those links yet.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
24. Proof? I'll bet they have confederate flags to go along with their AR-15s.
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 10:13 AM
Apr 2012

The fact they are still proud of what they did, also bolsters my opinion. They ought to be falling all over themselves to apologize to their new neighbors. If the lady had not been along . . . . . .

 

AH1Apache

(502 posts)
25. Just as I thought
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 10:16 AM
Apr 2012

no proof, just baseless accusations. We've come to expect that of you here Hoyt.

BTW, got those links yet?

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
32. You aren't even willing to entertain the thought these guys might be assholes. They are certainly
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 10:59 AM
Apr 2012

stupid enough to be bigots. And I have come to expect you to support anyone who deals with life through guns.

We know how you support Zimmerman. Just for a laugh, tell us your opinion of Randy Weaver and David Koresh -- I guess they are fine members of the gun culture too.

 

AH1Apache

(502 posts)
34. Obviously you didn't read my earlier post
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 11:10 AM
Apr 2012

where I said that they were idiots who very well could lose their 2A right.

They are stupid but that doesn't make them bigots.

I see your making more baseless, dishonest accusations about me again, just more par for the course from you.
Prove that I support anyone who deals with life with guns. Or are you once again just throwing your usual B.S. out there and hoping no one will notice?

BTW, got those links yet about where I supposedly supported Zimmerman? I've only been asking for those quotes now for 4-5 days now.

 

rl6214

(8,142 posts)
51. And he says it again here on edit
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 08:14 PM
Apr 2012

Hoyt (6,239 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

32. You aren't even willing to entertain the thought these guys might be assholes. They are certainly

Last edited Tue Apr 24, 2012, 11:03 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

stupid enough to be bigots. And I have come to expect you to support anyone who deals with life through guns.

We know how you support Zimmerman. Just for a laugh, tell us your opinion of Randy Weaver and David Koresh -- I guess they are fine members of the gun culture too.

Response to Hoyt (Reply #32)

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
23. I don't think I have been there
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 10:12 AM
Apr 2012

If I were, I was just driving through. But I do get the impression that you are saying that I'm not missing much?

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
39. Well they did shoot "In the Heat of the Night" there -- which is a good indication of what
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 11:38 AM
Apr 2012

you aren't missing.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
33. Newton County is relatively close to the setting for "Deliverance."
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 11:06 AM
Apr 2012

In fairness, I used to play an openback banjo. There's something about the drone. But I know what you mean.

jpak

(41,758 posts)
26. The vigilante gun-toters held the homeowners at gun point - because they were black
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 10:22 AM
Apr 2012

Racist vigilantism

yup

"loose"?


 

AH1Apache

(502 posts)
28. Just as I thought
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 10:26 AM
Apr 2012

no proof whatsoever, but we've come to expect that of you. I'll ask once again, where in the story did it say race was involved?

I see you had to throw in the race card here. Just your usual dribble.

 

AH1Apache

(502 posts)
36. Once again
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 11:16 AM
Apr 2012

no proof, just your usual B.S.. I'll ask again, where in the story does it refer to it being a racial thing?

Those two were complete idiots but that doesn't make it racial except in your mind because the man was black.
Just show us the proof that these two idiots confronted them because the man was black, and I don't mean because you "feel' it was racial because of skin color, but racist statements from those two.

 

AH1Apache

(502 posts)
38. Just as I thought
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 11:28 AM
Apr 2012

no proof. Were any racial epitaphs spewed from these 2 fucking idiots? Maybe it was racial, maybe it wasn't, you and I don't know, we weren't there.

Why is it you think that every crime involving a white on black crime is a racist thing, or is it just racist because a gun was involved?
Not every white on black crime is racist just like not every black on white crime is racist

You really need to get a new schtick.

ellisonz

(27,711 posts)
41. "This is my Second Amendment right. Look, this is the country out here, and we protect our own."
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 03:07 PM
Apr 2012

Who is "our own" in that context given the preceding event? You can stop pretending this incident didn't involve race now.

 

AH1Apache

(502 posts)
42. I'm not pretending
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 07:01 PM
Apr 2012

I take the accusation of racial crime seriously, show us proof that this was racially motivated.
That's all I'm asking.

ellisonz

(27,711 posts)
43. You didn't answer my question.
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 07:08 PM
Apr 2012

Who is "our own" in that context considering the preceding event? It's right there, can you see it

 

AH1Apache

(502 posts)
45. It could mean anything
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 07:19 PM
Apr 2012

from what you percieve as a racial slur to meaning their neighbors.
Now can you provide proof that it was a racial thing?
Nowhere in the article did it even indicate that it was racial.

ellisonz

(27,711 posts)
47. Clearly it means something...
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 07:33 PM
Apr 2012

...in the context I think it very clearly means people like them - hence "our own," which is clearly not people who look like his victims thus his determination that they were not like him. That's pretty damning proof of their mindset at the time. If you cannot see that, I really have to wonder why you're not conceding this point. These gentlemen acted for a reason and we have insight into their motivation from their own words. I don't know what proof short of them calling the Kaljoni's racial slurs you would need.

 

AH1Apache

(502 posts)
48. So now proof isn't needed.
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 08:09 PM
Apr 2012

Really? You really said that?
You are labeling people on the basis of them saying "our own"? How do you know that they didn't mean their neighbors?
I'll ask again, show us proof that they were detaining them was racially motivated, yes, they are asshats, doesn't mean their bigots or racists.

ellisonz

(27,711 posts)
50. That's proof enough
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 08:12 PM
Apr 2012

IMHO - at least he didn't say "them people."

And yes I did say that...also it's not like the house had been occupied for some time and I'd bet it was a foreclosure.

 

AH1Apache

(502 posts)
55. Well then, by that standard, I could call you a bigot racist and not have to prove it.
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 08:27 PM
Apr 2012

and before somebody alerts on this post, no I don't think that of you, but it could be true because I don't have any proof that your not.

ellisonz

(27,711 posts)
57. And you would be in error...
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 08:39 PM
Apr 2012

...because of a narrow-minded agenda to make things that are clearly to an extent about race not about race.

 

rl6214

(8,142 posts)
53. "our own" could very well be those in that neighborhood
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 08:19 PM
Apr 2012

that town, that county, that church congregation.

 

rl6214

(8,142 posts)
58. I don't know how big Newton county GA is
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 08:56 PM
Apr 2012

I don't know what criteria they might use, I don't just ASSume things.

ellisonz

(27,711 posts)
59. You're making an assumption that the obvious interpretation...
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 09:06 PM
Apr 2012

...is incorrect because there must be some other motive than what the facts make obvious. BTW - how the fuck are two well-dressed Americans approaching retirement age look so threatening so as to merit the use of assault rifles to accost them. If you can't see what's going on in this case, I really have to question your basic objectivity in such matters.

BTW - Porterdale, GA has a population of about 1200 according to the last census.

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
64. I don't know about these guys
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 10:08 PM
Apr 2012

but most of the time the term I have heard the phrase "we take care of our own" referred to people who wear camo or blue uniforms to work without any reference to race. It could have been referring to the community at large.

 

AH1Apache

(502 posts)
60. If you mean I would be in error in thinking you are a bigot racist
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 09:14 PM
Apr 2012

you would be correct because I truly do not believe you are, but once again, you have no proof that those 2 fucking asshats are either.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
73. You obviously have never spent much time in areas like that, or you are in a state of denial.
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 05:03 PM
Apr 2012

If the two new home owners had been inbred looking good ole boys/girls, the two with guns would have brought over a case of beer and a confederate flag to cover the table. I'll guarantee it.

 

rl6214

(8,142 posts)
52. "case closed"
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 08:17 PM
Apr 2012

Judge, jury and executioner, eh? Is that how it works with you, no real evidence, just your accusation?

YUP

YYUP
YYYUP

 

Meiko

(1,076 posts)
31. I have no words
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 10:43 AM
Apr 2012

that would explain how two people could be so stupid. If his son is a minor well that's a different story but good grief! You can't be holding people at gun point. I think there are a few exceptions, felony in progress, rape, kidnapping.....but changing locks...I don't think so. They deserve whatever they get.

ellisonz

(27,711 posts)
40. "This is my Second Amendment right. Look, this is the country out here, and we protect our own."
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 03:06 PM
Apr 2012
baby gunners and bigots to boot.
 

AH1Apache

(502 posts)
46. You have zero proof that their bigots
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 07:21 PM
Apr 2012

We protect our own could mean that we protect our neighbors, why does it always have to be about race when a black person is involved?

Look, I'm not defending these 2 fucking idiots actions, they are going to get what they deserve if there is any justice, but to immediately label it as a racial crime w/o proof is in my opinion, stupid.

 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
63. Thanks! No apology needed. Strong opinions cause that from me also at times. I am sure...
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 10:04 PM
Apr 2012

we agree on many things also! Welcome to the DU!!

Kaleva

(36,328 posts)
44. Less then friendly neighbors have now been charged
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 07:11 PM
Apr 2012

"A Newton County man and his son who authorities said held a gun on the new owners of a neighboring home were arrested Monday night and charged with aggravated assault, false imprisonment and criminal trespass."

http://www.ajc.com/news/newton-county-neighbors-charged-1424231.html

 

Atypical Liberal

(5,412 posts)
66. In Alabama this would have been legal.
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 02:10 AM
Apr 2012

In Alabama you can use deadly force to stop robbery or burglary of any degree, or unlawful or forceful entry into a home.

These guys probably could be reasonably shown to believe that a burglary was taking place.

Kaleva

(36,328 posts)
67. That might not be true because of this:
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 09:59 AM
Apr 2012

"The legal presumption that a person using deadly physical force is justified to do so pursuant to this subdivision does not apply if:

a. The person against whom the defensive force is used has the right to be in or is a lawful resident of the dwelling, residence, or vehicle, such as an owner or lessee, and there is not an injunction for protection from domestic violence or a written pretrial supervision order of no contact against that person;"

http://www.legislature.state.al.us/CodeofAlabama/1975/13A-3-23.htm

I'm unaware of any law that states that a homeowner or owner of a vehicle must provide written documentation of ownership to any non-law enforcement official that demands it.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
74. True, in Alabama they would have simply told the police, he "looked like" a burglar.
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 05:07 PM
Apr 2012

Good ole boy police would have given him a medal for protecting the purity of the neighborhood.

I hope those fuckers are convicted and have to give up their guns.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Neighbors in Newton Count...