Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumNRA Sought Donations in Days After Colorado Shootings
It was also sent as the national debate over gun rights has flared up, prompted by the Aurora shooting and continuing after the Aug. 5 shootings at a Sikh temple near Milwaukee. A gunman, identified as Wade Michael Page, a 40-year-old U.S. Army veteran, is suspected of killing six people in that incident before police shot him dead.
The four-page solicitation from NRA executive vice president Wayne LaPierre was sent to drum up funds to underwrite an advertising and grassroots campaign to defeat President Barack Obama and elect gun-rights supporters in Congress.
The letter drew criticism from the Denver-based Colorado Ceasefire Capitol Fund, a gun-control advocacy group, whose president Eileen McCarron called it very insensitive.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-07/nra-sought-donations-in-days-after-colorado-shootings.html
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)FEC Filing
The group reported in an Aug. 6 Federal Election Commission filing that its spending $133,000 to produce and air that spot. The filing also says the group received $3.4 million in donations since January 2011, with $3.1 million coming from Mayor Bloomberg and another $250,000 from billionaire philanthropist Eli Broad.
That pretty much tells me all I need to know about the gun control movement.
SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)gejohnston
(17,502 posts)but we are not talking about LaPierre or Obama. So your red herring is uncaged. But then, I can always count on an "anti" using some logical fallacy. We are talking about a big assed grass roots machine vs a couple of billionaires.
SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)NRA talking point - Mayors Against Illegal Guns = "a couple of billionaires"
Reasonable_Argument
(881 posts)Also, I'm surprised you took a moment to post instead of your usual job of acting like the Brady Campaign's RSS feed.
SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)Reasonable_Argument
(881 posts)That group is Bloomberg's creation.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)that is what MAIG told the FEC. Can you show where the NRA said it? Can you point to where the NRA said it as a talking point? Why are facts from the FEC, FBI, independent studies by respected criminologists "NRA talking points" while opinion pieces by people have no fucking clue what they are talking about objective truth? They are repeating Brady talking points.
spin
(17,493 posts)I know a number of ex members who decided to drop their membership because of all the mail and telephone calls they received from the political wing of the NRA, the NRA-ILA. That in no way means they disagree with the basic idea that American citizens have a right to own firearms for hunting, target shooting and self defense. Many if not most of the NRA "talking points" are solid.
As a over 40 year member of the NRA, I can tell you that they can indeed be a pain in the ass. Apparently they finally realized that I refuse to donate money to the NRA-ILA as I have stopped receiving solicitations. I don't always agree with the NRA but basically I support RKBA and the Second Amendment. If I believed that there was indeed a serious threat to gun owner rights, I would donate to the NRA-ILA. At this time I have no such fear.
ileus
(15,396 posts)Is the NRA supposed to expect an end to attacks on the 2A? Ever?
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)slackmaster
(60,567 posts)Non-story is a non-story.
Atypical Liberal
(5,412 posts)Equate
(256 posts)aikoaiko
(34,183 posts)Like others said, mass mailings are printed and scheduled months in advance.
But all the antigun talk of banning things that would not have prevented the tragedy in a Aurora probably put more money in both the NRA and NRA-ILA. The second org working against Obama.
Nice job there sparky!
spin
(17,493 posts)
Donate to the Brady Campaign today to help us pass life-saving gun laws to protect you and your family.
http://www.bradycampaign.org/donate
rl6214
(8,142 posts)What' s your point?