Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumCouple avoid paying damages in gun training accident
Pontiac An Oakland Circuit Court jury determined Tuesday no damages should be assessed against a Macomb County couple who allowed a May 2009 handgun safety class on their property in which the instructor accidentally shot a student in the face.
The injured man, Terry Gonser, 65, of Oakland Township sued Mitchell and Deborah Washer of Addison Township; the National Rifle Association; the instructor, Thomas Simpson; and Simpson's assistant, Gary Chapman.
In out-of-court agreements, the 78-year-old Simpson, who didn't check a handgun to see if it was loaded, settled for $255,000. His assistant, Chapman, settled for $101,000 and the NRA paid $75,000 to be dismissed from the lawsuit, according to court records and Gonser's attorney, James O. Elliott
Elliott said while the jury found the Washers negligent in permitting the concealed permit license safety class in their garage, members did not feel the couple were the proximate cause of injuries suffered by Gonser, or that they should be assessed any damages.
http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20121017/METRO02/210170432#ixzz29ggl3nVY
The injured man, Terry Gonser, 65, of Oakland Township sued Mitchell and Deborah Washer of Addison Township; the National Rifle Association; the instructor, Thomas Simpson; and Simpson's assistant, Gary Chapman.
In out-of-court agreements, the 78-year-old Simpson, who didn't check a handgun to see if it was loaded, settled for $255,000. His assistant, Chapman, settled for $101,000 and the NRA paid $75,000 to be dismissed from the lawsuit, according to court records and Gonser's attorney, James O. Elliott
Elliott said while the jury found the Washers negligent in permitting the concealed permit license safety class in their garage, members did not feel the couple were the proximate cause of injuries suffered by Gonser, or that they should be assessed any damages.
http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20121017/METRO02/210170432#ixzz29ggl3nVY
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 2085 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Couple avoid paying damages in gun training accident (Original Post)
SecularMotion
Oct 2012
OP
He's joking. Few on the gun-control side are really that serious about the issue.nt
Eleanors38
Oct 2012
#4
jenw2
(374 posts)1. That's ridiculous
People like that that spread violence by encouraging others to buy one of those things should be punished.
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)2. If you weren't being sarcastic...
you must have a serious comprehension problem.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)4. He's joking. Few on the gun-control side are really that serious about the issue.nt
digonswine
(1,485 posts)3. The injured party settled with the dumbfucks who were responsible-
Seems sensible to me.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)6. But, if you're a hog for more and more punishment, that's not enough...
"The surest way to work up a crusade in favor of some good cause is to promise people they will have a chance of maltreating someone. To be able to destroy with good conscience, to be able to behave badly and call your bad behavior "righteous indignation" -- this is the height of psychological luxury, the most delicious of moral treats."
--Aldous Huxley
petronius
(26,602 posts)5. That seems reasonable - I'm not actually sure why the jury found them
negligent at all. The injury was not caused or influenced by any defect in their property or actions, as far as I can see...
ileus
(15,396 posts)7. Costly lesson for all involved.