Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 04:04 PM Dec 2012

NRA: 10 ways it has weakened gun-control laws in the US

The NRA, working alongside like-minded conservative groups such as Alec, the American Legislative Exchange Council, has developed sophisticated lobbying networks designed to push back gun controls both at the federal and state level.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/apr/13/nra-weakened-gun-control-laws
63 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NRA: 10 ways it has weakened gun-control laws in the US (Original Post) Starboard Tack Dec 2012 OP
I had to stop reading at item #3 - Terror watch list slackmaster Dec 2012 #1
I'll have you know... discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2012 #2
Eh, who needs due process? bobclark86 Dec 2012 #25
did you see the source? gejohnston Dec 2012 #3
Great source "the Guardian" Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #4
What a father of school shooting victim has to say about the NRA: Howzit Dec 2012 #5
Yeah, well his God didn't do too much to help. Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #7
no, and scapegoating some skeetshooter in New York or Texas won't either gejohnston Dec 2012 #9
Correct. Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #12
problem is, if you go to gejohnston Dec 2012 #13
I know, that's what I've been saying for a long time. Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #14
They are just expressing what they always thought gejohnston Dec 2012 #15
Standing up against assholes like Bloomberg, Dan Gross, Josh Sugarman,... Clames Dec 2012 #16
Why don't you tell us what you oppose cocerning Bloomberg's suggestions. Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #55
Always the obvious questions from you. Clames Dec 2012 #57
I never said unconditionally Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #59
Go read my posts. Clames Dec 2012 #62
If you think anything is working right now, you are in denial. Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #63
they copied and pasted gejohnston Dec 2012 #6
Good for them! Looks like it might be their time. Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #8
if you want to contribute knock yourself out gejohnston Dec 2012 #10
I contribute in my way. Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #11
Contribute what? Insults and parroting their talking points? Clames Dec 2012 #17
Keep talking to that mirror. Times are about to change. Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #21
Keep talking to yourself. Clames Dec 2012 #23
Good for you. I'm talking to others, not myself. Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #26
Whatever helps you sleep at night. Clames Dec 2012 #27
That's right, keep spreading the fear. Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #29
Nope, not a single dime or discount. Clames Dec 2012 #48
I see. You do it for free. A true zealot. Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #49
Wrong again. Bad habit you are developing. Clames Dec 2012 #50
How big of you. Every pro-gun bullshit post you make supports the NRA. Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #51
How small of you. Clames Dec 2012 #58
this moron? gejohnston Dec 2012 #60
Teachers are not armed security. Could be if certified. Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #61
Why am I not surprised that you would go to the range Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #42
You have no room to talk about class. Clames Dec 2012 #47
By posting on the interweb rl6214 Dec 2012 #20
At least I don't get paid to post here, like some. Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #30
I'm sure you can name names since you seem so sure of it rl6214 Dec 2012 #32
No, but the likes of you and Clames come to mind Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #33
I wish I was getting paid to just sit and post propaganda on some forum rl6214 Dec 2012 #40
No...Adam Lanza has blood on his hands rl6214 Dec 2012 #19
We all do, especially those who endorse gun proliferation like you Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #22
Wrong. Clames Dec 2012 #24
Right, it's all about the healthcare situation. Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #28
You blame everything you can no matter how tenuous the connection you can make. Clames Dec 2012 #31
You lie. I've never apologized for criminals or buried my head hoping they'd go away. Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #34
Yes, my life, my family, my friends.... Clames Dec 2012 #36
It's all about you and fuck everyone else, right? Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #38
Can't get it right can you? Clames Dec 2012 #46
I see it exactly the other way round. Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #52
you have been those gejohnston Dec 2012 #37
No, I have challenged a few bogus SD claims. Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #39
Actually I am going to buy a new gun today rl6214 Dec 2012 #41
Thanks for sharing that. Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #45
We're still waiting to see your offering of solutions. Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #54
So why doesn't the all powerful Brady bunch has an organization in place rl6214 Dec 2012 #18
Why don't you ask them? Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #35
Aren't you on their payroll, you tell me and save me the trouble? rl6214 Dec 2012 #43
No, and I don't follow them. Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #44
Just like I don't belong to the NRA rl6214 Dec 2012 #53
Glad to hear it. Starboard Tack Dec 2012 #56

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
2. I'll have you know...
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 04:15 PM
Dec 2012

...the terror watch list kept me "safe" from flying with Senator Kennedy for a while.

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
3. did you see the source?
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 04:23 PM
Dec 2012

Like I told someone else, one of my best teachers in high school was a NYC transplant that gave lectures on critical thinking, back when the taught such quaint things in the backwoods. You would have benefited from his class, I thought UK standards were higher than that. Seriously, a one source that is an advocacy group? One that has more felons per capita than the NRA has lunatics?

here is my favorites:


2. Private gun sales loophole
Under existing federal law, unlicensed gun sellers are allowed to sell weapons without a background check of the buyer at gun shows and other private sales. Paradoxically, only licensed dealers are required to conduct such background checks, which gun control advocates see as crucial in cutting off the supply of weapons to criminals and mentally unstable individuals. The NRA strongly opposes legislation that would close this glaring loophole by requiring background checks for all gun sales.
no, the commerce clause does.
3. Terror watch list

The NRA has strongly opposed legislation to prohibit the sale of guns to people on the federal government's terrorist watch list. Under current law, a suspected terrorist can be put on the no-fly list and be kept off a plane, but can't be prevented from buying a gun.
this terror watch list? Gee, I didn't know Bloomberg was a Cheney and Bush fan. BTW, Ted Kennedy and Nelson Mandela was on that list too.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/14/nyregion/14watchlist.html?_r=0

4. Stand-your-ground laws
That isn't even a gun law, and has nothing to do with gun laws specifically.
9. Tracing guns used in shootings

In 2004, a Republican congressman from Kansas, Todd Tiahrt, a long-time ally of the NRA, added an amendment to bill regarding the bureau of alcohol, tobacco, firearms and explosives (ATF). Until that point, data had been kept on the history of guns used in murders and shootings, which allowed police and policymakers to trace them back to corrupt dealerships and other holes in the system. The rule change, known as the Tiahrt amendment, made this data much harder to acquire. It also forced the justice department to destroy within 24 hours the records of any gun buyer whose background check was approved. The overall impact of the amendments was to make it much harder for police to clamp down on illegally distributed guns.
Truth is, it remains easy for any law enforcement agency or DA to get trace data. Tiahrt only blocks non LE groups from gaining such information. NYPD can get it, just not MAIG or Brady.

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
4. Great source "the Guardian"
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 04:50 PM
Dec 2012

NRA has blood on it's hands. Nitpicking on the details excuses nothing. Why are you defending them? It's time to make a stand against this organization that spread fear and now the blood of children to promote it's evil agenda. The NRA is about GREED and FEAR, nothing else. All the rest is sugar coated bullshit.

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
7. Yeah, well his God didn't do too much to help.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 05:21 PM
Dec 2012

And his hiding behind such gobbledygook might have given him some personal solace, but it didn't bring his daughter back. And his denial of the NRA's responsibility didn't help any of those kids in Sandy Hook.

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
12. Correct.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 05:32 PM
Dec 2012

That's why the skeetshooters of this world need to stand up against the assholes who are ruining gun ownership for everyone. Otherwise, everyone goes down.

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
13. problem is, if you go to
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 05:49 PM
Dec 2012

some other forums, those skeet shooters are assholes and terrorists. It is like freeper left. Some of the same people were anti Mormon bigots during the election. Although I am not a Mormon, I was raised partly as one.
In some ways, this is more like 911 than either of the mass murders in the UK. The difference is where the assholes and bigots are. That is why I have to work at being civil at times to some individuals.

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
14. I know, that's what I've been saying for a long time.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 05:58 PM
Dec 2012

It's the old adage. If you can't take care of your own, others will do it for you.
This is the time for responsible gun owners to stand up against the NRA and the nutjobs and do a reality check. It's too late for "adjustment" laws, something is going to give very soon.
The fight is not with the banners right now, it is with those who want to remain gun owners and how to achieve that.

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
15. They are just expressing what they always thought
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 06:20 PM
Dec 2012

A few might be temporary outrage or soul searching. Something like this has an effect on everyones assumptions. Some react differently. It depends on how wedded they are to a specific ideology. I would like to think the other side would do the same someone with a gun saved a bunch of kids from a nut. Given the reaction to "antis" in many of the self defense postings, I doubt you would see an anti version Glassunion. I honestly think there would be the same "that awful vigilante" or "must have been a racist waiting to kill someone".

 

Clames

(2,038 posts)
16. Standing up against assholes like Bloomberg, Dan Gross, Josh Sugarman,...
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 06:48 PM
Dec 2012

...is a vastly better way to prevent the ruining of gun ownership.

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
55. Why don't you tell us what you oppose cocerning Bloomberg's suggestions.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 08:07 PM
Dec 2012

I think he makes a good start, but nothing like enough.

 

Clames

(2,038 posts)
57. Always the obvious questions from you.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 08:41 PM
Dec 2012

Better start would be why you give anything that 0.0001%'er says any weight? He's a wealthy egomaniac who enjoys having his personal army to protect him. Whatever his stance is on firearms, I oppose it. Just like I oppose his stance on Stop-and-Frisk. Telling you support him so unconditionally.

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
59. I never said unconditionally
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 10:00 PM
Dec 2012

and he only scratches the surface. And we're still waiting for your suggestions.

 

Clames

(2,038 posts)
62. Go read my posts.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 11:51 PM
Dec 2012

Hell, read those by many other regulars since we are fairly consistent on commenting what is working (NICS), what doesn't work (AWB's, universal registration), and what is just plain ignorant (repealing the 2A, bans on all semi-autos, etc).


Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
63. If you think anything is working right now, you are in denial.
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 03:57 PM
Dec 2012

What you really mean is it's working for YOU!
I'm trying to figure out a way for a safer society without you losing your guns.

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
6. they copied and pasted
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 05:09 PM
Dec 2012

a MAIG press release. That was the source. That is all MAIG and Brady are about.

 

Clames

(2,038 posts)
17. Contribute what? Insults and parroting their talking points?
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 06:50 PM
Dec 2012

That's been really effective hasn't it?




In case you need this:

 

Clames

(2,038 posts)
23. Keep talking to yourself.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 07:20 PM
Dec 2012

That's all you do. Times always change, but never how you think they will. I already own what I own and that's all there really is to it..

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
26. Good for you. I'm talking to others, not myself.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 07:30 PM
Dec 2012

They respond to me. There is movement. People are listening and many are changing their minds. Unfortunately, the extremists who promote carrying guns all over the place have screwed it up for the rest. That's how the world works when the loonies take over the asylum. Better hunker down there

 

Clames

(2,038 posts)
27. Whatever helps you sleep at night.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 07:35 PM
Dec 2012

But I saw plenty of fathers and mothers buying firearms yesterday on my weekly trip to the range. Father's buying for their sons. Mothers buying for themselves. People who know that things like signs don't do a fucking thing to protect them.

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
29. That's right, keep spreading the fear.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 07:43 PM
Dec 2012

Do they pay you to post this shit? Seriously, do you get paid to post NRA propaganda here, because I've never seen you post anything else?

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
49. I see. You do it for free. A true zealot.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 05:43 PM
Dec 2012

I'm listening to this moron teacher from Texas on NPR right now who is selling the same propaganda and wants to arm teachers.

 

Clames

(2,038 posts)
50. Wrong again. Bad habit you are developing.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 05:46 PM
Dec 2012

On a recent purchase I had the opportunity to donate an extra buck for the NRA. I left it blank.

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
51. How big of you. Every pro-gun bullshit post you make supports the NRA.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 05:52 PM
Dec 2012

Every handgun you buy and shoot supports their agenda. Don't talk about mourning dead children and shooting paper targets in the same breath please. It really is disgusting.

 

Clames

(2,038 posts)
58. How small of you.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 08:44 PM
Dec 2012

You have absolutely nothing left in this discussion. I'll mourn in my own way and say what I have to say. You don't like that? Tough.


Have a nice day...

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
60. this moron?
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 10:05 PM
Dec 2012

I do think armed security is a good idea. IIRC, they do in Canada. I remember reading that the Philippines has or had armed teachers. Given every book store and restaurant I went to in the Philippines had armed rent a cops, wouldn't be surprised. Teachers? I wouldn't mandate it, a dedicated security force is better.
http://stlouis.cbslocal.com/2012/12/17/county-police-chief-recommends-arming-school-personnel/

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
42. Why am I not surprised that you would go to the range
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 03:25 PM
Dec 2012

a day after such a tragedy. Wouldn't want to spoil your Saturday playing with your guns for a little introspection, would you? Shame on you! And shame on everyone else you saw at your range. Real classy!

 

Clames

(2,038 posts)
47. You have no room to talk about class.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 05:18 PM
Dec 2012

Shame on you for wallowing. Like I said, some of us don't bury our heads in the sand, some of us will be better prepared than others, some of us wish it was the CT shooter that we were shooting holes into rather than a sheet of thick paper with colorful circles on it. You have ZERO say of how others choose to mourn....

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
33. No, but the likes of you and Clames come to mind
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 01:34 PM
Dec 2012

along with a few others who fit the profile. I could be wrong. I think several have been kicked out over the last few days.
I can't be sure unless I see the paychecks, and some folk are just NRA dupes.

Personally, I don't differentiate. If it quacks and walks like a duck...

 

rl6214

(8,142 posts)
40. I wish I was getting paid to just sit and post propaganda on some forum
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 03:07 PM
Dec 2012

Instead I get by on my disability payments and hope they don't get taken away b
Y some sort of republican budget cut moves.

The same could be said about you being a paid shill for the Brady campaign but I don't go around accusing people on the Internet about wild conspiracies I know nothing about and of course we all know the Brady's have no money to do it. So I guess from now on you will be known as the Brady bunch shill because as you said, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck...

 

Clames

(2,038 posts)
24. Wrong.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 07:28 PM
Dec 2012

Those who think signs and gun-free zones offer protection from deranged lunatics. Those who focus on firearms and not the piss-poor mental healthcare situation. Those who ignore the culture of stupidity, willful ignorance, and selfishness that have taken root. Those who choose to ignore a potential situation because "it isn't my problem" or "I don't have time" or "somebody else will handle it". EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THESE SHOOTERS could have been stopped had someone, anyone, who knew them stepped up and said something. But no, that's too hard to do these days apparently. Blame the gun because a gun can't talk back.

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
28. Right, it's all about the healthcare situation.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 07:40 PM
Dec 2012

I don't blame the guns, I blame the assholes who put them in circulation and those who carry them around spreading NRA fear and greed propaganda. You know, the shit you bought into and now peddle.
You're more interested in correcting people's definition of what is an assault rifle, or comparing killing tools with seat belts and fire extinguishers.

We can have a discussion on healthcare anytime you like, but not here and not now. Maybe you think these events are rare in the UK solely because of universal healthcare. It sure helps, but the lack of access helps a million times more.

You need to start thinking of solutions. Just saying.

 

Clames

(2,038 posts)
31. You blame everything you can no matter how tenuous the connection you can make.
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 08:27 PM
Dec 2012

I haven't bought into a damned thing. I'm not an NRA member (I don't even have to pay for a membership either). I don't deny reality like those that think like you do. I don't apologize for criminals. I don't bury my head and hope they go away. I take an active interest in protecting my life unlike you who just hopes for the best. Solutions? Completely alien concept to you. You have offered nothing. You are keyboard commando'ing your way through yet another tragedy and insulting along the way. I put my money where my mouth is. You do not.

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
34. You lie. I've never apologized for criminals or buried my head hoping they'd go away.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 01:41 PM
Dec 2012

You don't have to be a NRA member in order to buy into their propaganda.

You take an active interest in protecting YOUR life - EXACTLY!

That's your solution, protecting YOUR life and YOUR family and YOUR arsenal.

The whole country is in mourning and what do you do? Go buy more fucking guns.
That is FUCKING SICK!

 

Clames

(2,038 posts)
36. Yes, my life, my family, my friends....
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 01:47 PM
Dec 2012

...taking an active role rather than relying on ineffective laws. Being in the mindset of someone who is prepared for the worst and hopes for the best. Something you will NEVER understand. People are the solution, not laws and willing ignorance.

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
38. It's all about you and fuck everyone else, right?
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 02:32 PM
Dec 2012

While the rest of us try to change the ineffective laws that you use to your own selfish advantage. You know nothing of my preparedness or my response to others in need. I am prepared for the worst every day. If I were not, I would not last a week in the environment I live in.
You are correct about one thing, though. It's about people, especially the children. Not just yours.

 

Clames

(2,038 posts)
46. Can't get it right can you?
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 04:36 PM
Dec 2012

It's about me, my family, my friends. My attitude extends well beyond myself. You are going to change absolutely nothing because of the selfish idea behind laws that do nothing. I focus on laws that at least have the potential to work for EVERYONE.

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
52. I see it exactly the other way round.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 06:21 PM
Dec 2012

Concealed carry is purely selfish. What changes do you support? What are your ideas for a solution? More guns? Please, let's hear your ideas.

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
39. No, I have challenged a few bogus SD claims.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 03:01 PM
Dec 2012

Don't recall ever using the expression "looking for a fight".
I support SD and the use of a firearm to defend one's home. I do not support taking guns to the street. Those who do are a big part of the problem.

 

rl6214

(8,142 posts)
41. Actually I am going to buy a new gun today
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 03:25 PM
Dec 2012

My wife has been a teacher for 31 years, all elementary education, grade 2-5 and she retired this year. She still subtitle teaches a few days a week for extra money since I am on disability and my income is fixed. She told me yesterday she wants a new gun she can conceal easier than the ones I own even though she knows she will not be able to carry it in the school. She will be able to lock it in the car on the street outside the school to give herself and her students a fighting chance if she might be able to get to it. I am tearing up as I type this because if I would be able to get to the school where my wife was at while something like one of these shootings was going on I would gladly give my life to try to stop something like what happened this last week.

No one knows how they would react in a situation like that, it is wired in our DNA. My son is a graduate of the US Naval Academy. A few years ago while he was a midshipman at the academy he and some of his friends were at a local Annapolis shopping mall and they were at the food court when shots were fired. Everyone went scrambling for cover but my son and his friends moved TOWARDS the gunfire, not away from it. The gunfire was between a gang banger and a secret service agent. The agent was wounded and the midshipmen were the first to tend to the agent.

I would hope I am of the same DNA as my son and would move towards the gunfire to help with the situation and not run from it. You never know until you are put in a situation like that.

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
45. Thanks for sharing that.
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 03:40 PM
Dec 2012

I have been in such situations, when I had to move towards the danger and the threat. It is not always easy, but I found it was a natural response if someone else was in danger. It never occurred to me that my having a gun would've helped and it still doesn't. I'm not a brave person, but neither am I a coward and I believe handguns are often the tools of cowards. I enjoy shooting them, but would never stoop to the level of carrying one around, telling myself it is a "safety device".
I might feel differently if I were disabled or if I were a woman who felt vulnerable. Stay safe.

 

rl6214

(8,142 posts)
18. So why doesn't the all powerful Brady bunch has an organization in place
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 07:00 PM
Dec 2012

You know there are SO many people that want gun control but only 4.5 million NRA members.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»NRA: 10 ways it has weake...