Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Doodler71

(443 posts)
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 11:09 PM Dec 2012

We are going about this the wrong way

What if we make the gun enthusiasts, NRA, and manufacturers responsible for a solution? In other words if you want to have the privilege of owning a gun then you (the collective you gun enthusiasts, supporters, etc) are responsible for making sure they don't fall into the wrong hands. If they can't come up with a solution to stop mass killing with these weapons, designed for killing as many people as possible, then the general manufacturing and owning of such weapons should be outlawed. Yes, I know the military will need them, they can contract out. I am talking about repealing the second amendment. If you want to own a gun then come up with a solution or lose the right. I am tired of these naysayers and the "oh we can't do anything..." or "it is too complex an issue." It is very simple solve it or lose it.

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We are going about this the wrong way (Original Post) Doodler71 Dec 2012 OP
how about learning current laws gejohnston Dec 2012 #1
How about laws change all the time Doodler71 Dec 2012 #7
It's not a privlege gejohnston Dec 2012 #9
Because your rights end where others begin. Doodler71 Dec 2012 #11
The hell they do. Clames Dec 2012 #15
since you are going for collective punishment of millions of innocent people gejohnston Dec 2012 #16
Not only would congress have to pass a constutional amendment to repeal the 2nd kelly1mm Dec 2012 #2
Every major change faces impossible odds Doodler71 Dec 2012 #8
re: "If you want to own guns, make it safe. Otherwise you are complicit..." discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2012 #10
You underestimate me. (Nt) Doodler71 Dec 2012 #12
No, no no. discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2012 #14
Well, if you say so. AtheistCrusader Dec 2012 #17
I already own guns TheMoreYouKnow Dec 2012 #18
What if that includes possibly intrusive mental health examinations dkf Dec 2012 #3
There is already a solution for that RegieRocker Dec 2012 #4
because they were not reported in the system gejohnston Dec 2012 #6
Agree Tumbulu Dec 2012 #5
re: "What if we make the gun enthusiasts, NRA, and manufacturers responsible for a solution?" discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2012 #13

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
1. how about learning current laws
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 11:18 PM
Dec 2012

or learning the issues? Simple answers to complex issues are not solutions. That is how the real world works. Deal with it. Besides, we do offer ideas and solutions only to be dismissed as "NRA talking points."

Doodler71

(443 posts)
7. How about laws change all the time
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 11:40 PM
Dec 2012

It is time to put up or shut up. If it can't be made safe, you lose the privledge.

Doodler71

(443 posts)
11. Because your rights end where others begin.
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 12:03 AM
Dec 2012

In modern democratic states, a privilege is conditional and granted only after birth. By contrast, a right is an inherent, irrevocable entitlement held by all citizens or all human beings from the moment of birth.

PRIVILEGE, rights. This word, taken its active sense, is a particular law, or a particular disposition of the law, which grants certain special prerogatives to some persons, contrary to common right. In its passive sense, it is the same prerogative granted by the same particular law.
2. Examples of privilege may be found in all systems of law; members of congress and of the several legislatures, during a certain time, parties and witnesses while attending court; and coming to and returning from the same; electors, while going to the election, remaining on the ground, or returning from the same, are all privileged from arrest, except for treason, felony or breach of the peace.Chit. Com. Law, 431.

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
16. since you are going for collective punishment of millions of innocent people
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 12:12 AM
Dec 2012

who had nothing to do with any crime, instead of the individual responsible through due process? I'm guessing the fourth and fifth amendments will be next since, using your definition, they are also privileges.

kelly1mm

(4,733 posts)
2. Not only would congress have to pass a constutional amendment to repeal the 2nd
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 11:19 PM
Dec 2012

amendment (unlikely as things stand now), then you would need to have 38 states ratify the amendment (almost impossible). Do you think that even today, if a vote were taken in congress tomorrow, that repealing the 2nd amendment would pass? Even more importantly do you really believe there are not 13 states that would refuse to ratify?

Doodler71

(443 posts)
8. Every major change faces impossible odds
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 11:42 PM
Dec 2012

If you want to own guns, make it safe. Otherwise you are complicit in the murders from here on out.

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
10. re: "If you want to own guns, make it safe. Otherwise you are complicit..."
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 11:59 PM
Dec 2012

You'll need 12 jurors for each of the 80,000,000 American gun owners to make that stick.

No thanks, you can try again.

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
14. No, no no.
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 12:06 AM
Dec 2012

I never underestimate doodlers. One of them invented the autopilot. Doodled it on a dinner napkin.

 

TheMoreYouKnow

(63 posts)
18. I already own guns
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 10:19 AM
Dec 2012

And they're perfectly safe. I've owned a self defense firearm of some sort for 38 years now and I've never had any part or responsibility in any firearm death or injury. Blame those who are responsible, not people like myself who have nothing to do with anything illegal.

 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
3. What if that includes possibly intrusive mental health examinations
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 11:21 PM
Dec 2012

Personally I think that is where we need to be looking but I do not know what federal laws allow.

 

RegieRocker

(4,226 posts)
4. There is already a solution for that
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 11:23 PM
Dec 2012

safes and gun trigger rfid safety releases. What failed with Lanza was why the guns were not secured so that he had no access? Why did she involve him with guns in the first pplace? n regards to Loughner and Holmes why were they able to get guns with a mental condition?

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
6. because they were not reported in the system
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 11:30 PM
Dec 2012

they were not adjudicated, the system had know way of knowing. That falls on the family and others around them.

Tumbulu

(6,291 posts)
5. Agree
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 11:29 PM
Dec 2012

The thing is- meaningful reform or they are gone. Period, end of story.

You are on the right track.

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
13. re: "What if we make the gun enthusiasts, NRA, and manufacturers responsible for a solution?"
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 12:04 AM
Dec 2012

You should write to the NRA and bring that up as an idea, they'll put those friendly folks over at ALEC to work on it.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»We are going about this t...