Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 08:31 AM Oct 2013

Twelve Years of NATO in Afghanistan: A Historic Failure

No celebrations have occurred on the anniversary of a war that, conveniently, is now "forgotten," despite the fact that Afghanistan remains occupied by 66,000 troops and its people are still dying because of the conflict.

On Oct. 7, 2001, the broadest military coalition in history — made up of 50 countries — bombarded the second-most underdeveloped country on the planet, whose military arsenal did not contain a single aircraft with which to defend itself. In the first three months alone, NATO bomber planes dropped 10,000 tons of bombs on the Afghans, roasting them over a blanket of snow and cold. Thousands were buried under the rubble of their adobe shacks, while millions fled with nowhere to run to — barefoot, terrorized and hungry. Eleven years later, the displacement of civilians in the north of the country was up 40 percent over the previous year. So much silence about war crimes! The allies’ intelligent devices destroyed water deposits, electrical power plants, crops and livestock (even Kabul Zoo!), and caused a muted human catastrophe. Meanwhile, euphoric Euro-MPs waved the “Save women from the burqa” banner — the same MPs who today parade Malala, the Pakistani girl, to prove the barbarous nature of the Taliban, drawing a dense smokescreen over U.S. drone attacks, which frequently snuff out the lives of dozens of children and adults.

----

The official reasons for the invasion of Afghanistan — once again living up to its name, Land of Tears — and its subsequent occupation by 300,000 soldiers and foreign mercenaries, were the following:

• To avenge the 9/11 attacks, though not one of the terrorists was an Afghan.

• To destroy the terrorists’ hideout and capture bin Laden. Why, then, with the Saudi Arabian bin Laden officially dead, did the U.S. stay in Afghanistan, and why is Washington (along with Spain!) still today negotiating with Kabul to stay on after 2014?

• To bring down the Taliban al-Qaida government and install democracy for a “primitive” people. So why is the United States negotiating with those barbarians in Qatar, with offers of power-sharing in various regions of the country? Why were they paying the Taliban huge bribes during those years, as they now admit?

• To put an end to the opium trade. Well! According to the United Nations, Afghan heroin production went up from 185 tons in 2001 to 5,800 in 2012. How is it that the government that the United States installed is actually the biggest legal drug trafficker in the world?


http://watchingamerica.com/News/224227/twelve-years-of-nato-in-afghanistan-a-historic-failure/
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Twelve Years of NATO in Afghanistan: A Historic Failure (Original Post) bemildred Oct 2013 OP
Afghanistan is not called "the Graveyard Of Empires" for no reason. unhappycamper Oct 2013 #1
Nothing will get you in trouble quicker than arrogance. bemildred Oct 2013 #2

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
1. Afghanistan is not called "the Graveyard Of Empires" for no reason.
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 08:42 AM
Oct 2013

Ask the Brits - they are back for their third try at Glory.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
2. Nothing will get you in trouble quicker than arrogance.
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 08:45 AM
Oct 2013

And it will keep you there too, until you wise up.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»National Security & Defense»Twelve Years of NATO in A...