Congress, Obama Admin ‘Duck & Cover’ On Nuclear Modernization
http://breakingdefense.com/2013/12/congress-obama-admin-duck-cover-on-nuclear-modernization/
A B-2 bomber drops a B61.
Congress, Obama Admin Duck & Cover On Nuclear Modernization
By Bob Butterworth on December 02, 2013 at 5:01 PM
When talking about nuclear policies and programs, defense leaders often emphasize that the Cold War is over. But given a chance to explain what is strategically different and how policies and programs need to be changed, they duck and cover.
Take, for example, a recent congressional hearing on the B61 nuclear bomb. The Defense and Energy Departments want Congress to approve plans for rebuilding the weapon, principally to replace its four remaining variants with a single new model, called the B61-12.
If deployed with the addition of a tail kit assembly from the Air Force, the new version should be more accurate and have a modest standoff capability. There has been no official statement of anticipated yield, but observers anticipate a variable yield similar to that of the B61-4 (.3 to 50 kilotons).
The B61 is made to order as a case study of in-depth deliberations about post-Cold War nuclear policies and programs. Since entering the inventory in 1966, the weapon has been modified into several versions, most of which are capable of being dropped from several types of fighter and bomber aircraft. The different weapons deliver yields reportedly ranging from .3 kilotons to about 340 kilotons. B61 has been the material embodiment of the US nuclear commitment to NATO. During the Cold War it was intended to be used both to blunt a large conventional attack by the Warsaw Pact and to trigger escalation to intercontinental nuclear war. Since the Cold War it has remained in Europe, in reduced numbers, perhaps due more to alliance politics than requirements of deterrence.