Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Final report on F-35 dropped references to fuel, IT problems
http://www.vancouversun.com/news/national/Final+report+dropped+references+fuel+problems/9734295/story.htmlFinal report on F-35 dropped references to fuel, IT problems
Postmedia News April 13, 2014
OTTAWA A Defence Department report billed as the first step in a more open, transparent era for the F-35 project initially listed many of the stealth fighters problems such as issues around fuel efficiency and software development but those sections were removed in the final version.
~snip~
Fuel Consumption: The F-35 consumes 26-per-cent more fuel than Canadas current jet fighter, the CF-18. Public Works and National Defence did not respond to questions last week about why the stealth fighter uses so much more fuel than the CF-18s, which were designed in the 1970s. Rising fuel costs are a concern for militaries around the world, particularly when it comes to aircraft. The Royal Canadian Air Force has said it plans to fly the F-35s about 20-per-cent less per year than the CF-18s to keep costs down, making up the difference with simulators.
Software Development: The is listed as the main challenge facing the F-35 in the very first draft of the report, and repeatedly cited as an issue in later drafts, until being removed altogether. The stealth fighter contains about 8 million lines of code, which is more than any other fighter aircraft. The software is essential for everything from flying the F-35, to communications, to using its weapons. Some versions of the report express optimism that the problems will be resolved before Canada gets its first stealth fighter, but others say there is a risk that, despite the time available before Canadas first anticipated aircraft delivery, they may not be completed. U.S. congressional auditors wrote last month that significant software development problems persist, threatening to create further delays in the fighter being ready for operation.
Helmet Development: A state-of-the-art helmet is essential for pilots to fly the F-35 safely and in a way that maximizes its full potential. However, the helmets development has been a serious problem for years. Defence officials acknowledged this in early versions of the report, describing it as a high risk, and noting an alternate helmet was being designed and could be used as a stop gap until the primary helmet is ready. There is no mention of helmets in the final version.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1019 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Final report on F-35 dropped references to fuel, IT problems (Original Post)
unhappycamper
Apr 2014
OP
merrily
(45,251 posts)1. The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
That is what governments require of their citizens. We need to reciprocate and impose their own standard (for us) on the people for whose salaries and expenses and perks we pay.
Getting elected once should not guaranty a lifetime of office holding, let alone making holding office a family business.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)2. So, you go out to buy a new car
to replace your old.
The new car, they tell you will cost 5 times what your old car did, burn 20% more fuel, and ther really hope it will actually be drivable by the time they deliver it to you, one of these days.
Makes perfect sense.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)3. Agreed
Sums it up rather well!