In place of 'boots on the ground,' US seeks contractors for Iraq
Wary of putting combat troops in Iraq, the U.S. government is gauging contractors interest in advising the Iraqi Defense Ministry and Counter Terrorism Service in a range of capacities, including force development, logistics and planning and operations.
The U.S. Army Contracting Command posted a notice last month seeking contractors willing to work on an initial 12-month contract, who should be cognizant of the goals of reducing tensions between Arabs and Kurds, and Sunni and Shias.
They would focus on administration, force development, procurement and acquisition, contracting, training management, public affairs, logistics, personnel management, professional development, communications, planning and operations, infrastructure management, intelligence and executive development, the notice stated.
Those services fall within the existing mission of the Office of Security Assistance-Iraq, which is to help build institutional capacity of Iraqs security ministries, Defense Department spokesman Commander Bill Speaks said in an email.
http://www.stripes.com/news/in-place-of-boots-on-the-ground-us-seeks-contractors-for-iraq-1.301798
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)What's the difference between sending troops & sending mercenaries?
Simple. The mercs cost 3-4 times as much as troops per individual, & the profits go more directly into private hands.
atreides1
(16,079 posts)Mercenaries don't have to adhere to the laws of warfare, have no code of conduct to follow, and won't be punished for war crimes and atrocities that they will surely commit!
AuntPatsy
(9,904 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)War and diplomacy as a business enterprise. Worth every penny, I'm sure. Better than wasting that money at home, I suppose
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Sopkoviak
(357 posts)I fully expect the Commander in Chief to rescind this atrocious decision and properly discipline the head of the Office of Security Assistance-Iraq.
Probably one of those Bush/Cheney "left behinds".
Response to jakeXT (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed